Jump to content

Shentel / Sprint LTE - (was ntelos - West & N&W Virginia)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

Well it looks like nTelos is selling its towers in the western market.

This looks like they may be setting themselves up for a buyout now since they're also dumping the eastern market. Sorry for the non hyper-linked URL it refused to redirect to the correct page...

 

*Edited for your reading pleasure

 

streetinsider.com/Corporate+News/NTELOS+Holding+(NTLS)+Enters+$41M+Towers+Sale+Agreement%3B+Offers+Prelim.+Q4+Sub+Metrics/10174649.html

Edited by GBtopgear
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it looks like nTelos is selling its towers in the western market.

This looks like they may be setting themselves up for a buyout now since they're also dumping the eastern market. Sorry for the non hyper-linked 

 

Interesting way to raise capital for NV upgrades. I hope nTelos is proactively ordering backhaul so that when they eventually replace cabinets/panels/rrus they will be able to fire up LTE right away. I was in Chestnut Ridge park in Morgantown last weekend and while 1x on 1900 was ok it did fall off pretty quickly once we got into the woods. 1x 800 would've fixed that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting way to raise capital for NV upgrades. I hope nTelos is proactively ordering backhaul so that when they eventually replace cabinets/panels/rrus they will be able to fire up LTE right away. I was in Chestnut Ridge park in Morgantown last weekend and while 1x on 1900 was ok it did fall off pretty quickly once we got into the woods. 1x 800 would've fixed that.

It is the new thing now, to sell your towers to a tower company and then the tower company leases them back to the company. I am not surprised at them doing this, and I am happy they are doing it. It means that they are taking some steps to funding network vision. I agree with the backhaul thing, I hope sprint taught them a few lessons about that. That was the biggest fail of network vision upgrades

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is the new thing now, to sell your towers to a tower company and then the tower company leases them back to the company. I am not surprised at them doing this, and I am happy they are doing it. It means that they are taking some steps to funding network vision. I agree with the backhaul thing, I hope sprint taught them a few lessons about that. That was the biggest fail of network vision upgrades

Hopefully all the towers have increased backhaul once the 4G arrives (for sprint users) since the nTelos only 4G only gets between 5-10Mbps according to rootmetrics.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully all the towers have increased backhaul once the 4G arrives (for sprint users) since the nTelos only 4G only gets between 5-10Mbps according to rootmetrics.

That sounds like normal LTE conditions under normal loading. Not sure how this is bad.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't want to get anyone's hopes up or make any kind of indication, but I recently spoke with a Shentel executive about the whole nTelos buyout and if Shentel would possibly pick up the markets that were left. All he could say is that it would not be out of the question if the price was right. I asked if there was any discussion about it, he just smiled and said nothing.

Edited by bbostwick8
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it looks like nTelos is selling its towers in the western market.

This looks like they may be setting themselves up for a buyout now since they're also dumping the eastern market. Sorry for the non hyper-linked URL it refused to redirect to the correct page...

 

*Edited for your reading pleasure

 

streetinsider.com/Corporate+News/NTELOS+Holding+(NTLS)+Enters+$41M+Towers+Sale+Agreement%3B+Offers+Prelim.+Q4+Sub+Metrics/10174649.html

 

Based on the small number compared to their overall site count, I assume Ntelos was unable unload their sites that use wooden poles.  You could not typically add another carrier to a wooden pole site without building a metal tower first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the small number compared to their overall site count, I assume Ntelos was unable unload their sites that use wooden poles. You could not typically add another carrier to a wooden pole site without building a metal tower first.

Also have to count the sites that they are on but dont own. Really all of these actions including the eastern market sell definitely make it easier for someone like Sprint/Shentel to buy them out on the cheap.

Hope/speculation and sensorly are all we got out here in nTelos land [emoji3]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm working on redoing the nTelos tower map I put together in the Sponsor section to include data on tower owners and the like, where such information is available.  You would be surprised just how many of their sites are on wooden poles. 

 

I also think nTelos must have previously sold towers to Crown Castle because just about any tower in the nTelos region with a registration that says "CROWN CASTLE" in all caps like that has nTelos on it.

 

- Trip

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like those wooden pole sites. Having service in the middle of nowhere makes me feel a little safer in case a bear, or a hillbilly were to attack. :unsure:;)

 

If a hillbilly were to tell you to "squeal like a pig" or that you had a "pretty mouth," you would fare better with a bow and arrow than with a cellphone.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a hillbilly were to tell you to "squeal like a pig" or that you had a "pretty mouth," you would fare better with a bow and arrow than with a cellphone.

In that case I would want more than just a bow and arrow. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case I would want more than just a bow and arrow. LOL

 

You miss the cultural reference.  A bow and arrow can provide "Deliverance" from hillbilly sodomy.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:rolleyes:

 

 

There are wooden pole sites in the Columbus Market with B41, so they can provide good service.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/97q39j10nhwvmrz/IMG_9554%20cropped.jpg?dl=0

Edited by dkyeager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I got the reference, I just wouldn't want anything left to chance.

 

If it is good enough for Burt Reynolds, then it is good enough for me...

 

07Deliverance_BD_lewis.jpg

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...