Jump to content

Shentel / Sprint LTE - (was ntelos - West & N&W Virginia)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

Well it looks like nTelos is selling its towers in the western market.

This looks like they may be setting themselves up for a buyout now since they're also dumping the eastern market. Sorry for the non hyper-linked URL it refused to redirect to the correct page...

 

*Edited for your reading pleasure

 

streetinsider.com/Corporate+News/NTELOS+Holding+(NTLS)+Enters+$41M+Towers+Sale+Agreement%3B+Offers+Prelim.+Q4+Sub+Metrics/10174649.html

Edited by GBtopgear
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it looks like nTelos is selling its towers in the western market.

This looks like they may be setting themselves up for a buyout now since they're also dumping the eastern market. Sorry for the non hyper-linked 

 

Interesting way to raise capital for NV upgrades. I hope nTelos is proactively ordering backhaul so that when they eventually replace cabinets/panels/rrus they will be able to fire up LTE right away. I was in Chestnut Ridge park in Morgantown last weekend and while 1x on 1900 was ok it did fall off pretty quickly once we got into the woods. 1x 800 would've fixed that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting way to raise capital for NV upgrades. I hope nTelos is proactively ordering backhaul so that when they eventually replace cabinets/panels/rrus they will be able to fire up LTE right away. I was in Chestnut Ridge park in Morgantown last weekend and while 1x on 1900 was ok it did fall off pretty quickly once we got into the woods. 1x 800 would've fixed that.

It is the new thing now, to sell your towers to a tower company and then the tower company leases them back to the company. I am not surprised at them doing this, and I am happy they are doing it. It means that they are taking some steps to funding network vision. I agree with the backhaul thing, I hope sprint taught them a few lessons about that. That was the biggest fail of network vision upgrades

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is the new thing now, to sell your towers to a tower company and then the tower company leases them back to the company. I am not surprised at them doing this, and I am happy they are doing it. It means that they are taking some steps to funding network vision. I agree with the backhaul thing, I hope sprint taught them a few lessons about that. That was the biggest fail of network vision upgrades

Hopefully all the towers have increased backhaul once the 4G arrives (for sprint users) since the nTelos only 4G only gets between 5-10Mbps according to rootmetrics.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully all the towers have increased backhaul once the 4G arrives (for sprint users) since the nTelos only 4G only gets between 5-10Mbps according to rootmetrics.

That sounds like normal LTE conditions under normal loading. Not sure how this is bad.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't want to get anyone's hopes up or make any kind of indication, but I recently spoke with a Shentel executive about the whole nTelos buyout and if Shentel would possibly pick up the markets that were left. All he could say is that it would not be out of the question if the price was right. I asked if there was any discussion about it, he just smiled and said nothing.

Edited by bbostwick8
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it looks like nTelos is selling its towers in the western market.

This looks like they may be setting themselves up for a buyout now since they're also dumping the eastern market. Sorry for the non hyper-linked URL it refused to redirect to the correct page...

 

*Edited for your reading pleasure

 

streetinsider.com/Corporate+News/NTELOS+Holding+(NTLS)+Enters+$41M+Towers+Sale+Agreement%3B+Offers+Prelim.+Q4+Sub+Metrics/10174649.html

 

Based on the small number compared to their overall site count, I assume Ntelos was unable unload their sites that use wooden poles.  You could not typically add another carrier to a wooden pole site without building a metal tower first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the small number compared to their overall site count, I assume Ntelos was unable unload their sites that use wooden poles. You could not typically add another carrier to a wooden pole site without building a metal tower first.

Also have to count the sites that they are on but dont own. Really all of these actions including the eastern market sell definitely make it easier for someone like Sprint/Shentel to buy them out on the cheap.

Hope/speculation and sensorly are all we got out here in nTelos land [emoji3]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm working on redoing the nTelos tower map I put together in the Sponsor section to include data on tower owners and the like, where such information is available.  You would be surprised just how many of their sites are on wooden poles. 

 

I also think nTelos must have previously sold towers to Crown Castle because just about any tower in the nTelos region with a registration that says "CROWN CASTLE" in all caps like that has nTelos on it.

 

- Trip

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like those wooden pole sites. Having service in the middle of nowhere makes me feel a little safer in case a bear, or a hillbilly were to attack. :unsure:;)

 

If a hillbilly were to tell you to "squeal like a pig" or that you had a "pretty mouth," you would fare better with a bow and arrow than with a cellphone.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a hillbilly were to tell you to "squeal like a pig" or that you had a "pretty mouth," you would fare better with a bow and arrow than with a cellphone.

In that case I would want more than just a bow and arrow. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case I would want more than just a bow and arrow. LOL

 

You miss the cultural reference.  A bow and arrow can provide "Deliverance" from hillbilly sodomy.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:rolleyes:

 

 

There are wooden pole sites in the Columbus Market with B41, so they can provide good service.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/97q39j10nhwvmrz/IMG_9554%20cropped.jpg?dl=0

Edited by dkyeager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I got the reference, I just wouldn't want anything left to chance.

 

If it is good enough for Burt Reynolds, then it is good enough for me...

 

07Deliverance_BD_lewis.jpg

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Yes! That does keep it from wandering off Dish and most importantly, reconnecting immediately (at least where there is n70). Thanks!
    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...