Jump to content

Shentel / Sprint LTE - (was ntelos - West & N&W Virginia)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

The T-Mobile sale could be for trading spectrum with Sprint. I do not know Sprint's unused spectrum holdings.

 

Looking at the financials, this seems to be rushed or premeditated.  There is no reserve for restructuring costs.  CAP-ex is assumed to continue at the same levels.  They lost more than 10% of their eastern customers during the last year while gaining more than 10% in their western markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stock down more than 60%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This website, http://markets.financialcontent.com/prnews/quote?Symbol=NTLS, gives a misleading picture.  Bloomberg is more accurate, http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/NTLS:US, which puts the loss at about 40%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A year ago the stock price was $21.40, now approx $4.40

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A year ago the stock price was $21.40, now approx $4.40

 

Slowly recovering a bit, but as Robert has mentioned the lower the better for Sprint. Although, I bet my friends on Wall Street are starting to digest this information and are frantically putting models together for a Sprint buyout. Oh the joys of legalized gambling finance. :)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what I took away from the Q&A in the conference call:

 

- They were getting beat in the east by Boost and Metro

- Required too much capital for more sites and spectrum in east plus too much eastern competion

- The issue list for the west is much more doable and they have less competition

- Intend to have 50% of western towers with LTE by end of 2015

- They have 115 towers total which they hope to sell and lease back [i assume only in the west]  Less than 1/2 are wooden poles.

- They said the spectrum they sold was for 3G thus had less value, same with market

- They said they have 27Mhz of their own spectrum in the west plus from Sprint: 20Mhz of PCS, 2.5 (unknown) plus 12Mhz of 800.  They intent to use the 800 for longer range and building penetration.

 

They also used the term "Another Strategic Partner" around the time they were discussing spectrum sales.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder where they will place their moved LTE towers.  Perhaps the non-wholesale areas of their map where they are competing with Shentel (Winchester and Hagerstown) or Sprint (Parkersburg, Gallipolis).  I would think they would want to get out of these areas too, but perhaps too much roaming costs would result for them. [edit: To maximize roaming revenue, I would expect new fully Sprint compatible towers to go into areas marked wholesale on their map - http://ir.ntelos.com/Cache/1001192642.PDF?Y=&O=PDF&D=&FID=1001192642&T=&IID=4110676 - page 5]

 

In the future, if they are not bought out, they could also move into remote areas of southwest Ohio where Sprint is not, such as McArthur, McConnelsville/Malta, Waterford/Beverly, New Lexington, Cadiz, Woodsfield.

Edited by dkyeager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder where they will place their moved LTE towers.  Perhaps the non-wholesale areas of their map where they are competing with Shentel (Winchester and Hagerstown) or Sprint (Parkersburg, Gallipolis).  I would think they would want to get out of these areas too, but perhaps too much roaming costs would result for them. [edit: To maximize roaming revenue, I would expect new fully Sprint compatible towers to go into areas marked wholesale on their map - http://ir.ntelos.com/Cache/1001192642.PDF?Y=&O=PDF&D=&FID=1001192642&T=&IID=4110676 - page 5]

 

In the future, if they are not bought out, they could also move into remote areas of southwest Ohio where Sprint is not, such as McArthur, McConnelsville/Malta, Waterford/Beverly, New Lexington, Cadiz, Woodsfield.

I would not think that you will see any expansion of nTelos into Ohio or anyplace else.  They are not into an expansion mode at all.

If I were the CEO, I would be looking at dropping the nTelos brand, selling off the spectrum, moving the current customers to Sprint, converting the nTelos stores to Sprint Stores.  Follow the Shentel model.  It sure has worked for Shentel.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, this is a head scratcher.  Why T-Mobile?  Why not Sprint?  Per my spreadsheets, both Richmond and Norfolk are PCS A-F block 20 MHz markets, which have little flexibility in spectrum refarming for additional LTE carriers.  Only $56 million would have been chump change for Sprint to shore up its spectrum situation in the Tidewater region.

 

AJ

Which PCS block does nTelos currently own in Norfolk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This really sucks for western VA customers too.  At least for now..... we have been promised all year that 70% of ntelosland would have 4g by the end of 2014.... Now it will be 50% with 4g by the end of 2015?????? Thats just ridiculous... 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which PCS block does nTelos currently own in Norfolk?

Nevermind... It looks like they own the lower 2/3rds of the B block (with the rest owned by Verizon).

 

It is a disaggregated portion of the former PrimeCo PCS license for the Richmond-Norfolk MTA.  Because of the spectrum cap at the time, VZW could not retain the entire license.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a disaggregated portion of the former PrimeCo PCS license for the Richmond-Norfolk MTA.  Because of the spectrum cap at the time, VZW could not retain the entire license.

 

AJ

 

PrimeCo! My first cell phone company. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stock seems to have stabilized at $4.55 today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a disaggregated portion of the former PrimeCo PCS license for the Richmond-Norfolk MTA.  Because of the spectrum cap at the time, VZW could not retain the entire license.

 

AJ

BTW, in this area, Verizon owns the entire cellular band since the Alltel merger. That seems patently uncompetative to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, this is a head scratcher. Why T-Mobile? Why not Sprint? Per my spreadsheets, both Richmond and Norfolk are PCS A-F block 20 MHz markets, which have little flexibility in spectrum refarming for additional LTE carriers. Only $56 million would have been chump change for Sprint to shore up its spectrum situation in the Tidewater region.

 

AJ

Won't be the first time Sprint ignored this market. Hampton Roads/Tidewater was also the largest metro area on the Eastern Seaboard where WiMax was never launched.

Edited by GoWireless
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't be the first time Sprint ignored this market. Hampton Roads/Tidewater was also the largest metro area on the Eastern Seaboard where WiMax was never launched.

 

Be clear -- pun intended.  That was Clearwire, not Sprint.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...