Jump to content

CNET article on LTE and Sprint NYC plus other areas


sprinturg4

Recommended Posts

I think most of Sprint's money for network upgrades disappeared after the Nextel fiasco, iPhone commitment deal, and staying too long with plans with only $10/month for unlimited data.

Can't start charging luxury pricing until you have the nice car built and ready for the showroom floor. But then you need the money which you don't have to make that nice car. Like the fried chicken and the egg thing. (oops.. Put an extra word on there)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't start charging luxury pricing until you have the nice car built and ready for the showroom floor. But then you need the money which you don't have to make that nice car. Like the fried chicken and the egg thing. (oops.. Put an extra word on there)

 

A Catch-22. At least, Sprint is slightly cheaper than Verizon and AT&T. So it's a tolerable "2nd class"/low-rent wireless carrier FOR NOW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Catch-22. At least, Sprint is slightly cheaper than Verizon and AT&T. So it's a "2nd class" wireless carrier for now.

Unless you go with the new plans, Sprint is more than AT&T now in a typical 3 line smartphone household.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you go with the new plans, Sprint is more than AT&T now in a typical 3 line smartphone household.

 

I'm lucky, that I'm on a family plan. Only $45/month for my share. If I had to get my own line, I would've taken over (Assumption/Transfer of Liability) an unlimited data Verizon plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-brings-4g-lte-and-enhanced-3g-network-improvements-to-the-bronx-and-brooklyn.htm

 

 

 

 Sprint (NYSE:S) today announced that its new 4G LTE network and improved 3G service will be available in the Bronx and Brooklyn beginning on July 30. 
Edited by nebody00
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More info on the slow LTE rollout from 5/7: http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-blames-vendor-execution-reason-network-vision-delays/2013-05-07

 

1) "The move to one unified multi-mode network [was] tied to the shutdown of the Nextel iDEN network"

 

2) "During the second half of 2012, we experienced delays with vendor execution, backhaul connectivity delays, shortages in equipment such as fiber cable and antennas, as well as other regulatory and environmental issues."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lack of fiber has to be driving sprint bonkers.

 

There has been a site on the roof of the building next to my work that had NV equipment installed over a year ago and it still doesn't have LTE broadcasting.  I mean, the building has fiber access (obviously), as it is in the middle of downtown.  It must be a major pain getting it to the roof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, that has been decided.  The new name will be a portmanteau of Sprint-SoftBank-Clearwire:  Spankwire.  The new web site domain is already set up.  Go ahead and try it.

 

AJ

 

Just don't do it from work...  LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lack of fiber has to be driving sprint bonkers.

 

Lack of fiber?  Somebody needs to get Sprint some Colon Blow, posthaste.

 

http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/colon-blow/n9822/

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how the Bronx and Brooklyn got 4G LTE first lol. I bet I know why

 

It seems the coverage maps are showing LTE in all boroughs, even though they're only talking about Bronx and Brooklyn. http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4302-sprint-to-launch-lte-in-new-york-philadelphia-portland-and-other-cities-on-july-30/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooklyn is actually mostly middle class. Sure there are neighborhoods that are ghetto, but most of it just doesn't have a lot of restrictions. For instance my neighborhood in Brooklyn is landmarked and as a result, doing any work is a hassle. I was surprised when Sprint lit up LTE here but after looking through permits I saw that they had applied for it nearly a year ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, it's better to have a name with no history in the USA than the stigma and negative history of the "Sprint" brand.

NV won't be done for another year and even then, they're gonna start converting the GMOs. No point in a name change till then. Let "Sprint" soak up all the anger and "" reaps the benefit late 2014.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the person said above we didn't know what was going to happen with sprint. We didn't know if Dish was going to buy them and have the network be Dish's problem or if Sprint will remain the same but with Clearwire and Softbank. I'm sure sprint corporate decided to pause network vision in major markets until the bidding war was completed. I honestly don't blame them, why continue building out the network if dish was going to take over and redo everything

 

Now that chapter is done, and we are under Softbank's control I'm sure sprint is really trying their best to hurry things up. Some things will take time but I know some things will be forced to speed up. None of us expected to have clearwire TD LTE turned on last week so that's a sign they are trying.

 

I just hope we can get some sort of timeline to know what's going on but I'm sure we won't get one so I'm hoping softbank/sprint does a big press event that announces The New Sprint with their exact vision and goals.

 

I want the other 3 to be scurred!!! Lol beware of global domination

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NV won't be done for another year and even then, they're gonna start converting the GMOs. No point in a name change till then. Let "Sprint" soak up all the anger and "" reaps the benefit late 2014.

I completely agree with this. Currently, NV is causing problems. Yes, they're problems that Sprint expected, but they're not what the public expected. For one, the rollout being slow is often attributed to "Slow Sprint", often compared to the WiMAX rollout. Additionally, 3G NV cells will often drop when handing off back to legacy. This was seen in Chicago, and is currently being seen in West Michigan. So, no point in a name change when people are having dropped call issues and service going in and out as things are getting situated. Perhaps later.

 

And really, would it make a difference in the end? Those who are upset will still know it's the same company...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, based on the many negative comments in the CNET article, Sprint has put together a focus group to consider a new name.  Instead of Sprint, what do you think of the following potential names?  Hobble?  Crawl?  Or Usain Bolt?

 

This was comedy gold, yet overlooked.  I am a little disappointed in you guys...

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the person said above we didn't know what was going to happen with sprint. We didn't know if Dish was going to buy them and have the network be Dish's problem or if Sprint will remain the same but with Clearwire and Softbank. I'm sure sprint corporate decided to pause network vision in major markets until the bidding war was completed. I honestly don't blame them, why continue building out the network if dish was going to take over and redo everything

 

 

I totally disagree. When you have a capital improvement plan you go forward with it no matter what. Why? Because the money is already spent. What we are seeing now is a glut of sights that were completed but waiting for approval. The timing is just coincidental. Clear may have been a different situation. I suspect the towers were approved and ready to go and they waited until after the merger to flip the switch. In either case work did not stop.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally disagree. When you have a capital improvement plan you go forward with it no matter what. Why? Because the money is already spent. What we are seeing now is a glut of sights that were completed but waiting for approval. The timing is just coincidental. Clear may have been a different situation. I suspect the towers were approved and ready to go and they waited until after the merger to flip the switch. In either case work did not stop.

Yeah you're right

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

my assumption is New Sprint wants July 30th to happen like yesterday - so they can announce a typical poor quarter.  Then Mr. Son can start to get New Sprint into the press with announcements.  This is also why I bet they are waiting to go live with the 2 boroughs in  NYC on the 30th to help show the future rather than the past.  

 

I don't know SoftBank nor Mr. Son - BUT from what i have seen in video and and written word he is not a person that likes to come in last nor enjoys his company taking it by TMO or any other carrier.   

 

who knows maybe I'm all wrong... hope I'm not :-) 

 

thoughts?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

my assumption is New Sprint wants July 30th to happen like yesterday - so they can announce a typical poor quarter. Then Mr. Son can start to get New Sprint into the press with announcements. This is also why I bet they are waiting to go live with the 2 boroughs in NYC on the 30th to help show the future rather than the past.

 

I don't know SoftBank nor Mr. Son - BUT from what i have seen in video and and written word he is not a person that likes to come in last nor enjoys his company taking it by TMO or any other carrier.

 

who knows maybe I'm all wrong... hope I'm not :-)

 

thoughts?

Idk we'll wait and see. I can start seeing the light at the end of the tunnel but we still have miles away lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...