Jump to content

CNET article on LTE and Sprint NYC plus other areas


sprinturg4

Recommended Posts

I think most of Sprint's money for network upgrades disappeared after the Nextel fiasco, iPhone commitment deal, and staying too long with plans with only $10/month for unlimited data.

Can't start charging luxury pricing until you have the nice car built and ready for the showroom floor. But then you need the money which you don't have to make that nice car. Like the fried chicken and the egg thing. (oops.. Put an extra word on there)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't start charging luxury pricing until you have the nice car built and ready for the showroom floor. But then you need the money which you don't have to make that nice car. Like the fried chicken and the egg thing. (oops.. Put an extra word on there)

 

A Catch-22. At least, Sprint is slightly cheaper than Verizon and AT&T. So it's a tolerable "2nd class"/low-rent wireless carrier FOR NOW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Catch-22. At least, Sprint is slightly cheaper than Verizon and AT&T. So it's a "2nd class" wireless carrier for now.

Unless you go with the new plans, Sprint is more than AT&T now in a typical 3 line smartphone household.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you go with the new plans, Sprint is more than AT&T now in a typical 3 line smartphone household.

 

I'm lucky, that I'm on a family plan. Only $45/month for my share. If I had to get my own line, I would've taken over (Assumption/Transfer of Liability) an unlimited data Verizon plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-brings-4g-lte-and-enhanced-3g-network-improvements-to-the-bronx-and-brooklyn.htm

 

 

 

 Sprint (NYSE:S) today announced that its new 4G LTE network and improved 3G service will be available in the Bronx and Brooklyn beginning on July 30. 
Edited by nebody00
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More info on the slow LTE rollout from 5/7: http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-blames-vendor-execution-reason-network-vision-delays/2013-05-07

 

1) "The move to one unified multi-mode network [was] tied to the shutdown of the Nextel iDEN network"

 

2) "During the second half of 2012, we experienced delays with vendor execution, backhaul connectivity delays, shortages in equipment such as fiber cable and antennas, as well as other regulatory and environmental issues."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lack of fiber has to be driving sprint bonkers.

 

There has been a site on the roof of the building next to my work that had NV equipment installed over a year ago and it still doesn't have LTE broadcasting.  I mean, the building has fiber access (obviously), as it is in the middle of downtown.  It must be a major pain getting it to the roof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, that has been decided.  The new name will be a portmanteau of Sprint-SoftBank-Clearwire:  Spankwire.  The new web site domain is already set up.  Go ahead and try it.

 

AJ

 

Just don't do it from work...  LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lack of fiber has to be driving sprint bonkers.

 

Lack of fiber?  Somebody needs to get Sprint some Colon Blow, posthaste.

 

http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/colon-blow/n9822/

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how the Bronx and Brooklyn got 4G LTE first lol. I bet I know why

 

It seems the coverage maps are showing LTE in all boroughs, even though they're only talking about Bronx and Brooklyn. http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4302-sprint-to-launch-lte-in-new-york-philadelphia-portland-and-other-cities-on-july-30/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooklyn is actually mostly middle class. Sure there are neighborhoods that are ghetto, but most of it just doesn't have a lot of restrictions. For instance my neighborhood in Brooklyn is landmarked and as a result, doing any work is a hassle. I was surprised when Sprint lit up LTE here but after looking through permits I saw that they had applied for it nearly a year ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, it's better to have a name with no history in the USA than the stigma and negative history of the "Sprint" brand.

NV won't be done for another year and even then, they're gonna start converting the GMOs. No point in a name change till then. Let "Sprint" soak up all the anger and "" reaps the benefit late 2014.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the person said above we didn't know what was going to happen with sprint. We didn't know if Dish was going to buy them and have the network be Dish's problem or if Sprint will remain the same but with Clearwire and Softbank. I'm sure sprint corporate decided to pause network vision in major markets until the bidding war was completed. I honestly don't blame them, why continue building out the network if dish was going to take over and redo everything

 

Now that chapter is done, and we are under Softbank's control I'm sure sprint is really trying their best to hurry things up. Some things will take time but I know some things will be forced to speed up. None of us expected to have clearwire TD LTE turned on last week so that's a sign they are trying.

 

I just hope we can get some sort of timeline to know what's going on but I'm sure we won't get one so I'm hoping softbank/sprint does a big press event that announces The New Sprint with their exact vision and goals.

 

I want the other 3 to be scurred!!! Lol beware of global domination

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NV won't be done for another year and even then, they're gonna start converting the GMOs. No point in a name change till then. Let "Sprint" soak up all the anger and "" reaps the benefit late 2014.

I completely agree with this. Currently, NV is causing problems. Yes, they're problems that Sprint expected, but they're not what the public expected. For one, the rollout being slow is often attributed to "Slow Sprint", often compared to the WiMAX rollout. Additionally, 3G NV cells will often drop when handing off back to legacy. This was seen in Chicago, and is currently being seen in West Michigan. So, no point in a name change when people are having dropped call issues and service going in and out as things are getting situated. Perhaps later.

 

And really, would it make a difference in the end? Those who are upset will still know it's the same company...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, based on the many negative comments in the CNET article, Sprint has put together a focus group to consider a new name.  Instead of Sprint, what do you think of the following potential names?  Hobble?  Crawl?  Or Usain Bolt?

 

This was comedy gold, yet overlooked.  I am a little disappointed in you guys...

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the person said above we didn't know what was going to happen with sprint. We didn't know if Dish was going to buy them and have the network be Dish's problem or if Sprint will remain the same but with Clearwire and Softbank. I'm sure sprint corporate decided to pause network vision in major markets until the bidding war was completed. I honestly don't blame them, why continue building out the network if dish was going to take over and redo everything

 

 

I totally disagree. When you have a capital improvement plan you go forward with it no matter what. Why? Because the money is already spent. What we are seeing now is a glut of sights that were completed but waiting for approval. The timing is just coincidental. Clear may have been a different situation. I suspect the towers were approved and ready to go and they waited until after the merger to flip the switch. In either case work did not stop.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally disagree. When you have a capital improvement plan you go forward with it no matter what. Why? Because the money is already spent. What we are seeing now is a glut of sights that were completed but waiting for approval. The timing is just coincidental. Clear may have been a different situation. I suspect the towers were approved and ready to go and they waited until after the merger to flip the switch. In either case work did not stop.

Yeah you're right

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

my assumption is New Sprint wants July 30th to happen like yesterday - so they can announce a typical poor quarter.  Then Mr. Son can start to get New Sprint into the press with announcements.  This is also why I bet they are waiting to go live with the 2 boroughs in  NYC on the 30th to help show the future rather than the past.  

 

I don't know SoftBank nor Mr. Son - BUT from what i have seen in video and and written word he is not a person that likes to come in last nor enjoys his company taking it by TMO or any other carrier.   

 

who knows maybe I'm all wrong... hope I'm not :-) 

 

thoughts?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

my assumption is New Sprint wants July 30th to happen like yesterday - so they can announce a typical poor quarter. Then Mr. Son can start to get New Sprint into the press with announcements. This is also why I bet they are waiting to go live with the 2 boroughs in NYC on the 30th to help show the future rather than the past.

 

I don't know SoftBank nor Mr. Son - BUT from what i have seen in video and and written word he is not a person that likes to come in last nor enjoys his company taking it by TMO or any other carrier.

 

who knows maybe I'm all wrong... hope I'm not :-)

 

thoughts?

Idk we'll wait and see. I can start seeing the light at the end of the tunnel but we still have miles away lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...