Jump to content

All Sprint acquisition discussion (was "Japan's Softbank in talks for $12.8 bln Sprint stake")


kckid

Recommended Posts

As long as SoftBank brings their Hello Kitty Android phone to the US, I'm all for it.

 

http://mb.softbank.j...p/831sh_kt.html

 

Speaking of which, I just started catching up on back episodes of "J-Pop America Fun Time Now!" so I realistically know what to expect from our new Softbank sensei.

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I, for one, welcome our new Japanese overlords

 

:D

 

Jokes asides, I'm not sure how I feel about this. On one hand, Sprint will benefit from this and hopefully accelerate NV rollouts. On the other, I'm sure SoftBank will make some major changes. I just hope they keep the Sprint name.

 

BTW that Hello Kitty phone looks so smexy XD

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i might be wrong, but i don't think this deal will happen. SoftBank is paying too little for Sprint. AT&T/ Tmo deal was valued at abt $32Bil (older network & less subs) Sprint is worth closer to $35Bil - 40Bil+. Sprint will be profitable in 2014 or early too

Edited by alphnasx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I' date=' for one, welcome our new Japanese overlords

[/quote']

 

I thought this was very funny. It just made me laugh and laugh.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Right now this is all speculation. We know there are talks but this leaking probably hurts the chances it will occur.

I personally have no qualms about this sale, but all this talking can make this a more expensive deal for SoftBank(either pay more to get 75% or get a smaller cut).

 

I (tentatively) welcome our new Japanese overlords :D

 

Also....I get to use this awesome sig :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now this is all speculation. We know there are talks but this leaking probably hurts the chances it will occur.

 

...then again, this might be a "strategic leak" by Sprint to gauge public and market acceptance, AND to lower the percentage SoftBank will get for it's money...

 

At this level of play, even just a whispered word in the right ear can be worth a whole lot of money or influence in the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...then again, this might be a "strategic leak" by Sprint to gauge public and market acceptance, AND to lower the percentage SoftBank will get for it's money...

 

At this level of play, even just a whispered word in the right ear can be worth a whole lot of money or influence in the deal.

I do wonder that if this deal fails through, SoftBank might just buy T-Mobile USA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 503ducati

...then again, this might be a "strategic leak" by Sprint to gauge public and market acceptance, AND to lower the percentage SoftBank will get for it's money...

 

At this level of play, even just a whispered word in the right ear can be worth a whole lot of money or influence in the deal.

According to Bloomberg this has been in talks for the last several months now. Deal completed next week?

 

 

 

VIDEO http://www.bloomberg...?cmpid=msnmoney

 

http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2012/10/11/dealpolitik-what-is-softbank-up-to-with-sprint/?mod=msn_money_ticker

 

65zs5s.png

Edited by 503ducati
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh...it may be an over generalization on my part, but what markets well to Japanese audiences typically doesn't to American audiences.

 

It usually does, except for pop culture, in which case Japan is generally 3 decades behind on what American audience want

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would Dan stay?

 

Optimistically, yes - considering how he has been able to turn Sprint around and set it in more or less the right direction and headed toward a cash positive future in a few years. I was waiting for an equity stake announcement to shore up Sprint's short term financials to get them through NV faster and help with potential future buyouts. The T-Mobile rumor has abounded for quite some time and it seems that Softbank may have found a way around regulatory hurdles through majority ownership of Sprint in pursuing the deal again.

 

Realistically, it could go either way as they may have some other thoughts on where they want sprint to head. If they do let Dan go in his current capacity, I'm sure he will receive a hefty severance or if stepping down as Chairman may stay on the board with a sizable stock option (but that is probably more on the optimistic side)

 

but if you want to play worst case scenario, we may see another large-scale catastrophe or series of minor events that cumulatively destroy the future of softbank/sprint. Perhaps Japanese bank implosion or large-scale global financial meltdown, a nuclear disaster or attack, tsunamis, earthquakes, ww3, civil war in the US, alien invasions or even Godzilla for crying out loud. {sarcasm}. Either way it will be an amazing thing to behold. Whether that is an amazing and spectacular tragedy remains largely to be seen, but I'm leaning more towards the positive side of things and am glad they inked out all of the fine print, crossed their "t's"and dotted their "i's". The official announcement has taken (most) everyone by surprise, but with hindsight being 20-20 you can see where all of the pieces fit into place and how all of the players on the stage acted the part very well. Whether Sprint, Dan, T-Mobile, DT, Softbank or the rest, you can now put the pieces together fairly easily.

 

I don't believe there was any coincidence that:

 

1. T-Mobile made out with a nice chunk of change from the failed merger (which was never going to pass regulatory scrutiny anyway)

2. T-Mobile acquired a nice chunk of spectrum

3. Sprint lobbied against the doomed merger/buyout citing regulatory concerns

4. Softbank failed at their initial buyout of US carriers

5. D-T has been pursuing an exit strategy in various ways which clearly were to fail

6. Sprint has kept clearwire on life support but managed to put spectrum to use so it would not be lost while maintaining majority control of the company but not much of the liabilty.

 

My post is getting a little long winded but there are countless pieces that fell in to place at the right times all around. Most of this was more or less smoke and mirrors to consolidate spectrum holdings while keeping the big 2 from cannibalizing all of the 4th and lower tier carriers and their respective customers and spectrum holdings.

 

 

On the note of name change. Likely there will be some change but not too major. (softsprint? j/k) Perhaps they will just change the name to NOW and drop the "Now Network " mantra/slogan completely for something pertaining to the future

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make no mistake: If this happens, Softbank is here to go to war with the domestic providers. The US market hasn't had real competition for years... Verizon and AT&T do everything short of outright collusion to get richer and fatter. Softbank will hand them their asses... just watch.

 

Read Softbanks history and you'll see they rose to number two in Japan because they were incredibly aggressive on price. I have little doubt they're banking (hah!) on that working here too. It will! It would be awesome for the US consumer and could change the whole industry for the much better.

 

My only worry in the deal is personal... I'd rather not lose the privileges that come with being a customer for almost 15 years.

 

EDIT: Wow... a timely opinion piece that supports my thesis:

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/terokuittinen/2012/10/11/us-consumers-need-softbank-to-buy-sprint/

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Edited by borf
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only worry in the deal is personal... I'd rather not lose the privileges that come with being a customer for almost 15 years.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

This is what I have been thinking about all day.....I dont want to become a number for some foreign company's bank statement....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using JB 4.1.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also have mixed feelings about this. I can see some tremendous advantages to Sprint getting the influx of money and some fresh ideas - but I do not want to lose my "current position" as a long term Sprint customer with an excellent grandfathered plan... :(

Sent from Photon Q LTE - Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not a long term customer, so I am not concerned about my personal position. And I know my personal position is actually most impacted by the duopoly. So anything that Softbank can do to strengthen Sprint's position and better compete against the duopoly is better for me. Better for us all. Even better for the long term Sprint customers, all things considered.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one that thinks it odd that they formally acknowledged the deal? I cannot help but think we are missing the real player Sprint wants to step up and put a bid on the table. I have been expecting something but this came out of left field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
    • Lots of time if you can get close to the pole, you will see a sticky label on the box that is low enough to read. Most of the time it warns of RF exposure but also it may have a toll free number to call if there is an issue. Sometimes there is a power company meter with the name of the user. I would be surprised if there was nothing there to help identify it.  Thinking further, if this is multi-Tenant oDAS, then maybe you might only see some name like Crown Castle or maybe even a department in the city government.   An app on your phone may show the carrier(s)
    • I found a multi-carrier oDAS node at the corner of Bushwick Ave & Cedar St. You can see an upgraded Verizon macro deployment behind the node, and T-Mobile has a fully upgraded site only a block away. So, the only thing that makes sense is that this is an AT&T node with LTE+mmWave (or maybe C-Band).
    • I tried going into a Boost Mobile store and they wouldn't sell me a rainbow SIM card, said that it would be dead as soon as I put it in the Moto Edge 2023... which I know is bs... 
    • They didn't do all 2.5 with the Sprint merger, so I'm not sure why they would do that for USCC in areas arguably more rural. But I'm 100% sure they'll swap out the gear. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...