Jump to content

LG G2 -- the first Sprint tri band LTE handset (was "LG Optimus G2")


Thai

Recommended Posts

Seeing the precursors to rumors of a Google Play Edition of the G2: http://www.phonedog.com/2013/08/02/should-the-nexus-brand-be-replaced-by-google-play-edition-devices/

 

Eighth paragraph:

 

I've already heard mention of a Play Edition LG G2.

 

Anyone see anything similar, and what are the odds it would be CDMA? Am I correct in thinking it would be the first CDMA Play Edition phone?

Edited by Nrbelex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing the precursors to rumors of a Google Play Edition of the G2: http://www.phonedog.com/2013/08/02/should-the-nexus-brand-be-replaced-by-google-play-edition-devices/

 

Eight paragraph:

 

 

Anyone see anything similar, and what are the odds it would be CDMA? Am I correct in thinking it would be the first CDMA Play Edition phone?

I'd put the chances of a CDMA Play Edition of the phone at precisely 0.000001%.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one needs an official Nexus handset any longer when Google is releasing "Nexus-ized" ROMs for the Galaxy S4, HTC One, and presumably other popular devices in the future.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd put the chances of a CDMA Play Edition of the phone at precisely 0.000001%.

 

 

Care to elaborate? There have been Nexus phones on Sprint in the past.

cletus is right.  Google has given up on CDMA Nexus phones...see their issues with Verizon's GN.  There are already Google Editions phones (GS4 and HTC One) on the market.  Both of these phones have Sprint counterparts.  Yet, GE phones are ONLY for GSM. 

 

CDMA has issue with updating or something like that where the carrier (Verizon and Sprint) has tight control over it.  Therefore, updating a Nexus or Google Edition phone takes a roundabout way with CDMA...thus taking away the essence of having a Google phone.  Google learned this the hard way with Galaxy Nexus on Verizon and Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one needs an official Nexus handset any longer when Google is releasing "Nexus-ized" ROMs for the Galaxy S4, HTC One, and presumably other popular devices in the future.

 

AJ

In addition, Google is now updating the software in parts.  So, you really don't need 4.3 or Nexus to get the latest Google Maps for example. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon really is the one that killed everything!  This is why Verizon's GN does not have Google Wallet.

 

But here is the official explanation: http://www.droid-life.com/2012/02/03/google-issues-statement-regarding-cdma-nexus-devices/

 

"Hello! This is a quick clarification about support for CDMA devices.  For various technical reasons, recent CDMA Android devices implement core telephony functionality in .apk files provided in binary form by the carriers. To function correctly, these .apk files must be signed by the so-called “platform” key. However, when an individual creates a custom build from the AOSP source code, they don’t use the same signing key as these CDMA flies were signed with.

 

The result is that these files don’t work properly, and pure AOSP builds running on these devices can’t place calls, access mobile data, and so on. Because we aim to make sure that we are as clear as possible about the degree of support that devices have, we updated the docs over at source.android.com to reflect this reality.

 

We will still make available as many as possible of the closed-source binaries for these devices, and Nexus devices will continue to have unlockable bootloaders. And, of course, GSM/HSPA+ devices are still supported, as are any other devices we’re able to support. We’ve simply updated the documentation to be clearer about the current extent of CDMA support.

 

We are of course always working to improve support, and we’ll keep everyone updated as we make improvements. Thanks as always for your interest in AOSP!"

 

 

So, on Google's end, it is a pain in the ass to update CDMA phones...and the control is with the carrier, not Google.  Unless something change in the future, there is little to no chance that we will ever see a Nexus or Google Edition phone on Sprint.

Edited by Thai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Care to elaborate? There have been Nexus phones on Sprint in the past.

As far as I understand it boils down to this: GSM phones use SIMs on the various GSM carriers so if you have a SIM you can toss it in any compatible phone and you are good to go.. However, Sprint and Verizon require pre-approval for all phones before they are added to the network. In addition to this the radios/apk files must be digitally signed by Sprint/Verizon. Basically these networks don't want to allow Google to update their phones without extensive testing and signoffs beforehand. Google does not like this and is therefor not supporting CDMA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one needs an official Nexus handset any longer when Google is releasing "Nexus-ized" ROMs for the Galaxy S4, HTC One, and presumably other popular devices in the future.

 

AJ

 

That seems like an argument against the likelihood of future Nexus devices, which I agree may be in doubt, not Google Play Edition devices.

 

cletus is right.  Google has given up on CDMA Nexus phones...see their issues with Verizon's GN.  There are already Google Editions phones (GS4 and HTC One) on the market.  Both of these phones have Sprint counterparts.  Yet, GE phones are ONLY for GSM. 

 

CDMA has issue with updating or something like that where the carrier (Verizon and Sprint) has tight control over it.  Therefore, updating a Nexus or Google Edition phone takes a roundabout way with CDMA...thus taking away the essence of having a Google phone.  Google learned this the hard way with Galaxy Nexus on Verizon and Sprint.

 

I know there are technical hurdles (there's a decent discussion of them here: http://www.androidcentral.com/ask-ac-google-play-edition-phones-verizon-or-sprint) but it's by no means an impossibility. There are plenty of ROMS to convert the Verizon GS4 to a Play Edition version (see http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2343355), so the software side can't be that complicated.

 

What were the problems with the Galaxy Nexus on Sprint and VZ that you're referring to? I have multiple friends who have the VZ Galaxy Nexus who love it and get updates pretty frequently (though not as fast as on the GSM carriers).

 

 

In addition, Google is now updating the software in parts.  So, you really don't need 4.3 or Nexus to get the latest Google Maps for example. 

 

Eh, some parts are now broken out, but not the main components of the OS, new features, capabilities and bug fixes are not added or fixed, and it does nothing about the terrible skins OEMs put over the OS. The leaks so far point to the G2 having a completely ridiculous skin which is a deal-breaker for me...

 

 

That's interesting. Definitelty explains a fair amount. But I would point out that the Google Play Edition devices are not AOSP. They do include proprietary components like customized camera software, so special APKs don't seem like they would be impossible.

 

 

Overall, yea, you're all probably right that it's extremely unlikely, but I'm gonna keep my fingers crossed anyway. Really hoping it's possible to get a Play Edition Sprint Tri-band LTE phone, even if it's not the G2. I'm sick of skins and a horrendous OS update process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overall, yea, you're all probably right that it's extremely unlikely, but I'm gonna keep my fingers crossed anyway. Really hoping it's possible to get a Play Edition Sprint Tri-band LTE phone, even if it's not the G2. I'm sick of skins and a horrendous OS update process.

Your best hope is a Motorola X Phone II with tri-band support! :D  Motorola nowadays is pretty Google-esque.

 

But, yeah, like you, i would love to have a Google phone.  I did have a Nexus S 4G...what a POS!  But that was more of Samsung fault than Google's.  Update was not all that quick from what i remember (GB to ICS)....and it didn't run that well on the phone.

Edited by Thai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That seems like an argument against the likelihood of future Nexus devices, which I agree may be in doubt, not Google Play Edition devices.

 

I practically guarantee that the market of Sprint subs who would be willing to pay on the order of $649 for a Google Play edition handset is minuscule.  Why in the world would they do that?  They would then activate it or attach it to their existing plan, which includes device subsidy that they would not be using.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I practically guarantee that the market of Sprint subs who would be willing to pay on the order of $649 for a Google Play edition handset is minuscule.  Why in the world would they do that?  They would then activate it or attach it to their existing plan, which includes device subsidy that they would not be using.

 

AJ

Doesn't Sprint have a pre-paid thing now?  I have not looked into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I practically guarantee that the market of Sprint subs who would be willing to pay on the order of $649 for a Google Play edition handset is minuscule.  Why in the world would they do that?  They would then activate it or attach it to their existing plan, which includes device subsidy that they would not be using.

 

AJ

Yeah, the only scenario people would do this in is early upgrades I guess? OTOH, taking a Google Play edition phone to a Sprint MVNO like Ting/Virgin/Zact might be attractive for some people. A minuscule amount for sure though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I practically guarantee that the market of Sprint subs who would be willing to pay on the order of $649 for a Google Play edition handset is minuscule.  Why in the world would they do that?  They would then activate it or attach it to their existing plan, which includes device subsidy that they would not be using.

 

AJ

 

You're definitely right about that. I was contemplating that exact scenario and it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. You'd essentially be wasting the built-in subsidy that you're always paying for as part of the plan. I'd probably still opt to do it, but I can't imagine the market would be worth it.

 

But if the hardware is already there (which it is), then maybe the negligible work on the software could make it profitable (to LG) if they sell it at the exorbitant unsubsidized price? Create more buzz and tinker-friendly street-cred...?

 

 

Yeah, the only scenario people would do this in is early upgrades I guess? OTOH, taking a Google Play edition phone to a Sprint MVNO like Ting/Virgin/Zact might be attractive for some people. A minuscule amount for sure though.

 

 

Portability between the various Sprint MVNOs could be a selling point. But I agree that it's an extremely unlikely scenario.

Edited by Nrbelex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://androidcommunity.com/lg-g2-tipped-to-launch-in-korea-on-august-8-with-quadbeat-2-earphones-20130806/

 

Damn, LG is literally throwing the kitchen sink into G2! Now, we also get nice earphones with 3 buttons! This may mean that my klipsch X7i with Apple controls will have full function.

 

Wow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How has LG been with Android updates and how intrusive are the LG "skins"? I'm super interested in this phone unless it is not very well supported and loaded down with terrible skins..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How has LG been with Android updates and how intrusive are the LG "skins"? I'm super interested in this phone unless it is not very well supported and loaded down with terrible skins..

 

http://youtu.be/xRtCJmcw-6A

 

The skin looks terrible. Look at the monstrosity that is the notification panel at 0:25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://youtu.be/xRtCJmcw-6A

 

The skin looks terrible. Look at the monstrosity that is the notification panel at 0:25.

Have you seen the Touchwiz notification panel? That is hideous ;-) Also, this is pretty much the same notification pull down that LG has had for a while.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://youtu.be/xRtCJmcw-6A

 

The skin looks terrible. Look at the monstrosity that is the notification panel at 0:25.

That's OK...hey, i am using TouchWiz on my Note 2.  I can handle it! :)  As long as it does not eat too much into internal memory, i am OK...and as long as LG G2 has 32GB internal memory (vs 16GB on Note 2), i should be a happy camper!  LG overlay seems similar to TouchWiz.

Edited by Thai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we talking about the bootloader? Aren't recent Sprint phones unlocked? For example, the Moto X is unlocked on Sprint.

I think LG boot loader is locked, but not encrypted. Usually easy to crack the locked boot loader. At least, that was the case with the original Optimus G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the LG status bar looks much much better than the Touch wiz one. Blue and grey is much nicer looking than green and grey. I'm ready to try this bad boy out. The app icons don't bother me because I use Nova Launcher with custom icons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...