Jump to content

Comments related to the NV Running List Thread


Recommended Posts

Here's my educated guess:

 

Sprint is installing shiny new site equipment with new backhaul (microwave, fiber, or what have you). So they set up shiny new network "cores", or data centers, with all the network routers and such. Cutover is probably much simpler and less disruptive than trying to work with the legacy locations.

 

That's what I figger anyway.

 

Sounds good and completely plausible.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good site and great information.

Very much looking forward to NV here in Ft Wayne, IN market. After having only 1x in my town for the past 9 years, I won't know what to do.

 

Thanks! That is a common thing I hear from Northern Indiana and Southern Michigan. :(

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks! That is a common thing I hear from Northern Indiana and Southern Michigan. :(

 

Robert

 

I was so happy when Sprint finally purchased iPCS and got rid of their crap. Seeing this area as a 2nd round market was like a godsend, having used WiMax maybe twice.

 

Looking forward to keeping up with everybody's progress through this site. :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4G core?

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

LTE and eHRPD use the PDN Gateway architecture IP core network to get to the internet. Any PSTN failover happens in the PDN gateway as a separate link. The old EVDO carriers are tied to both the eNodeB (where they're now called eHRPD) and the existing HA (home agent) gateway that ties to the PSTN and the 1x carrier network. LTE is tied ONLY to the eNodeB and PDN gateway network, which it shares only with eHRPD. eHRPD exists only to make LTE (4G) / EVDO (3G) transitions smooth and seamless, retaining the same IP address & subnet. The OLD EVDO (only-- non- eHRPD) / 1x network MUST be separate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good site and great information.

Very much looking forward to NV here in Ft Wayne, IN market. After having only 1x in my town for the past 9 years, I won't know what to do.

 

Yeah, it is about time that the Harry Baals Government Center got some LTE. Bring on the LTE for your Harry Baals.

 

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sprint is deploying LTE over its entire network between now and Spring 2014.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a list of places not getting Sprint LTE:

 

.

.

.

.

 

lol thanks., a pic was posted over in the sprint forums that showed supposed LTE coverage.. Seemed a bit sparse in some areas. For the life of me I can't find that post now. Go figure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a heads up.

 

NE Indiana, more specifically, the little town I live in has 3G as of this afternoon. I'm trying to determine whether it's just the closest tower to my house or all in the county. I also am unaware if it's a full NV deployment or what.

 

I'm so happy though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a heads up.

 

NE Indiana, more specifically, the little town I live in has 3G as of this afternoon. I'm trying to determine whether it's just the closest tower to my house or all in the county. I also am unaware if it's a full NV deployment or what.

 

I'm so happy though.

 

You never had 3G data where you live before?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You never had 3G data where you live before?

 

Until this afternoon, never.

For the past 7 years, to get 3G and/or WiMax, I've had to drive to either Muncie or Ft. Wayne, 45 mins either direction.

When iPCS first sued Sprint, they stopped upgrading. Thankfully Sprint bought them out and now things are looking up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until this afternoon, never.

For the past 7 years, to get 3G and/or WiMax, I've had to drive to either Muncie or Ft. Wayne, 45 mins either direction.

When iPCS first sued Sprint, they stopped upgrading. Thankfully Sprint bought them out and now things are looking up.

 

Wow. Welcome to the Sprint 3G family. Saw your speed test and I must say you have good data speeds for new 3G. Hopefully they don't slow down anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Welcome to the Sprint 3G family. Saw your speed test and I must say you have good data speeds for new 3G. Hopefully they don't slow down anytime soon.

 

Thanks man, it's nice to be a part of the modern age.

I think the speeds should stay fairly consistent, town of 5K. Now I just need the EVO LTE to see if it's a full upgrade :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks man, it's nice to be a part of the modern age.

I think the speeds should stay fairly consistent, town of 5K. Now I just need the EVO LTE to see if it's a full upgrade :tu:

 

According to the NV list, you aren't scheduled for Network Vision upgrades until later this year, but they could have already put compatible equipment up ahead of time. At least, hopefully they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the NV list, you aren't scheduled for Network Vision upgrades until later this year, but they could have already put compatible equipment up ahead of time. At least, hopefully they did.

 

I know. And after hearing about some issues with the Chicago rollout, I was expecting LATE end of the year. It may just be a upgrade to EVDO, but I find it hard to believe going to that trouble and then coming back in a few months and doing more work.

 

Granted, when does Sprint ever make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know. And after hearing about some issues with the Chicago rollout, I was expecting LATE end of the year. It may just be a upgrade to EVDO, but I find it hard to believe going to that trouble and then coming back in a few months and doing more work.

 

Granted, when does Sprint ever make sense.

 

And that brings us all back to the question about new towers, did they just get plain upgrades and aren't ready for NV, or will they be partly NV ready from the time they are turned on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that brings us all back to the question about new towers, did they just get plain upgrades and aren't ready for NV, or will they be partly NV ready from the time they are turned on?

 

The "new tower" I checked out in PHX was legacy equipment. So I guess that means they are not installing Network Vision equipment till they arrive to that market to do the full NV buildout. (although this is just one experience in an isolated case.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "new tower" I checked out in PHX was legacy equipment. So I guess that means they are not installing Network Vision equipment till they arrive to that market to do the full NV buildout. (although this is just one experience in an isolated case.)

 

Frankly, I consider that a waste of resources. They could have gotten everything ready for NV, but just put a software restriction in to prevent faster data speeds to maintain their "schedule". Oh well, that's just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Robert would you be able to tell me if they started NV in 60087? Around Lewis and sunset?

 

Sent From My Evo 4G Amped Up On Verizon Tower Power!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Frankly' date=' I consider that a waste of resources. They could have gotten everything ready for NV, but just put a software restriction in to prevent faster data speeds to maintain their "schedule". Oh well, that's just my opinion.[/quote']

 

I agree to some extent. However, I wonder if new sites are handled by their Network Manager, Ericsson? ALU is the NV vendor for Phoenix. So its probably two separate contracts handling two separate things. Plus, we don't know how "new" this site is. Is it one month old, three months old, six months old? We aren't sure.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Robert would you be able to tell me if they started NV in 60087? Around Lewis and sunset?

 

Sent From My Evo 4G Amped Up On Verizon Tower Power!

 

Looks like they are just starting NV at some sites in Waukegan. Three of them are scheduled to start NV in May. The rest look like August. The May sites will have 3G come live pretty quickly. The 4G LTE will come live later (like all the Chicago market). Although it appears the schedule may have slipped a little by a week or two.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...