Jump to content

Dish Network proposes merger with Sprint Nextel for $25.5 billion

PythonFanPA

By PythonFanPA
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 517
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

S4GRU
S4GRU

I go on vacation, and this is the first thing I read when I get back. Oh, my God, no. This is conceivably the worst thing for Sprint. It would be better to go it alone than to be owned by Charlie.

S4GRU
S4GRU

Unlimited is the least of my concerns. All my concerns about DISH takeover begin and end with Charlie Ergen. He is a ruthless, tyrannical megalomaniac. And furthermore, he will not keep any of his

MagnusOchncap
MagnusOchncap

SEC just gave it's blessing to the SoftBank-Sprint union.   http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/2/4293352/sprint-clear-to-vote-on-softbank-buyout-after-sec-approval

irev210 Member Level: 4G WiMax

irev210

Posted
Posted

The biggest issue I see with Dish buying sprint is DEBT.

 

Charlie is pulling out all the stops to make this deal even a possibility.

 

Bottom line:

 

The two companies, combined, would have too much debt to effectively utilize all of the spectrum they would have to properly execute any sort of business plan.

 

Softbank is throwing a lot of money into Sprint because of the foundation that Sprint has and the opportunity of building on that foundation with Clearwire's spectrum to offer a mobile experience that rivals can't match - IE they would actually offer hugely disruptive services that the established incumbents wouldn't be able to duplicate. This is a similar strategy that Softbank deployed in Japan which was hugely successful.

 

Sure, Sprint shareholders might be pleased but let's not forget about Sprint bondholders - they wouldn't be pleased one bit.

 

Basically, Dish would be too levered to do anything meaningful with the solid sprint foundation that's being laid. Softbank, however, is primed to build.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kg4icg Member Level: 4G WiMax

kg4icg

Posted
Posted
The biggest issue I see with Dish buying sprint is DEBT.

 

Charlie is pulling out all the stops to make this deal even a possibility.

 

Bottom line:

 

The two companies, combined, would have too much debt to effectively utilize all of the spectrum they would have to properly execute any sort of business plan.

 

Softbank is throwing a lot of money into Sprint because of the foundation that Sprint has and the opportunity of building on that foundation with Clearwire's spectrum to offer a mobile experience that rivals can't match - IE they would actually offer hugely disruptive services that the established incumbents wouldn't be able to duplicate. This is a similar strategy that Softbank deployed in Japan which was hugely successful.

 

Sure, Sprint shareholders might be pleased but let's not forget about Sprint bondholders - they wouldn't be pleased one bit.

 

Basically, Dish would be too levered to do anything meaningful with the solid sprint foundation that's being laid. Softbank, however, is primed to build.

 

Forbes said in a article yesterday to the tune of around $45 billion in debt after it was said and done If it were to happen

Said Softbank was the best fit for Sprint.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigsnake49 Member Level: LTE Advanced

bigsnake49

Posted
Posted

The biggest issue I see with Dish buying sprint is DEBT.

 

Charlie is pulling out all the stops to make this deal even a possibility.

 

Bottom line:

 

The two companies, combined, would have too much debt to effectively utilize all of the spectrum they would have to properly execute any sort of business plan.

 

Softbank is throwing a lot of money into Sprint because of the foundation that Sprint has and the opportunity of building on that foundation with Clearwire's spectrum to offer a mobile experience that rivals can't match - IE they would actually offer hugely disruptive services that the established incumbents wouldn't be able to duplicate. This is a similar strategy that Softbank deployed in Japan which was hugely successful.

 

Sure, Sprint shareholders might be pleased but let's not forget about Sprint bondholders - they wouldn't be pleased one bit.

 

Basically, Dish would be too levered to do anything meaningful with the solid sprint foundation that's being laid. Softbank, however, is primed to build.

 

Bondholders are apparently not too happy:

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-18/sprint-lenders-clash-with-owners-on-dish-bid-corporate-finance.html

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
supert0nes Member Level: eHRPD

supert0nes

Posted
Posted

Anyone ready for some FUD?

 

Dish: Our offer for Sprint is better 'for national security' than SoftBank offer

 

 

Dish Network (NASDAQ: DISH) asked the FCC to pause its review of Japanese operator SoftBank's proposed acquisition of 70 percent of Sprint Nextel (NYSE:S) while Sprint's board considers Dish's own counterbid for Sprint. Dish said its offer for Sprint "is better for the American consumer, better for Sprint's shareholders, and better for U.S. national security than the SoftBank proposal."

 

Read more: Dish: Our offer for Sprint is better 'for national security' than SoftBank offer - FierceWireless http://www.fiercewir...8#ixzz2QqweIFMb

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnHovah Member Level: 4G WiMax

JohnHovah

Posted
Posted

Anyone ready for some FUD?

 

This article made me laugh so hard that I had non-stop hiccups, belching fits and nearly sharted myself to death after having previously vomited in my mouth.

 

I invite Ergen to correlate his brain farts to the present ownership interests of the other big wireless carriers... As Katt Williams once said, "Don't worry, I'll wait..........."

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rawvega Member Level: 4G LTE

Rawvega

Posted
Posted

Would this takeover be a material change to our agreement to cancel service? Don't want no Dish takeover...

 

While I certainly understand your position, I highly doubt that a Dish takeover would equate to a get out of ETF free card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Keitarou Member Level: 3G EVDO

Keitarou

Posted
Posted

While I certainly understand your position, I highly doubt that a Dish takeover would equate to a get out of ETF free card.

 

that's a bummer... too bad we the subscribers have no say in this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JeffDTD Member Level: 4G WiMax

JeffDTD

Posted
Posted

Captain Howdy has taken his fantasy to the FCC now, trying to postpone the softbank/sprint approval. It amazes me that he seems to consider sprint incompetent in speaking for itself. He also plays no role in the approval of the softbank/sprint tie up. Just more rhetoric from the cap'n .

 

http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-18/dish-asks-fcc-to-defer-action-on-softbank-bid-for-sprint.html

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Captain Howdy has taken his fantasy to the FCC now, trying to postpone the softbank/sprint approval. It amazes me that he seems to consider sprint incompetent in speaking for itself. He also plays no role in the approval of the softbank/sprint tie up. Just more rhetoric from the cap'n .

 

Indeed. FCC approval is just that -- approval to go forward. But it certainly does not consummate the deal.

 

Let the FCC finish its review, say yea or nay, and then the Sprint board can consider its options.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PythonFanPA Member Level: LTE Advanced

PythonFanPA

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well, its not a rumor, it's a Wall Street Journal article they're referencing. I didn't bother linking direclty to it though because you have to have a subscription to view it unfortunately.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Sprint sets up special committee to evaluate Dish offer:

 

I am only 35 miles away. I had my ringer silenced and must have missed the call to join the committee. Damn.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fraydog Member Level: LTE Advanced

Fraydog

Posted
Posted

 

I am only 35 miles away. I had my ringer silenced and must have missed the call to join the committee. Damn.

 

;)

 

AJ

 

I thought you would have the inside information for us. Come on AJ, you have to get to Overland Park to be briefed by Hesse on what Sprint is going to do. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

I thought you would have the inside information for us. Come on AJ, you have to get to Overland Park to be briefed by Hesse on what Sprint is going to do. :)

 

Sure. I will set up shop with my spectrum analyzer on the Sprint Campus. Then, I will make you my one phone call to come bail me out.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fraydog Member Level: LTE Advanced

Fraydog

Posted
Posted

 

Sure. I will set up shop with my spectrum analyzer on the Sprint Campus. Then, I will make you my one phone call to come bail me out.

 

AJ

 

I'm in the car. I'll be able to make it to KC in six hours after driving across the blackness we call "rural Missouri." :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • iansltx
      U.S. Cellular

      By iansltx · Posted

      Tbh not that surprising. Every ISP seems to want to have an MVNO to pitch to their customers to make them stickier and maybe make some money in the process. And unlike USCC the MVNO should be able to cover TDS's entire wireline area, with infrastructure costs that are borne by someone else. Entertaining, yes. Surprising, not really...particularly when competing against Comcast or Spectrum, or even eventually T-Mobile fixed + mobile. This also strengthens my bet that they'll rebrand all their fixed wireless stuff as TDS, as that runs on spectrum they're keeping for now.
    • Dkoellerwx
      Galaxy S22 thread

      By Dkoellerwx · Posted

      No? RCS on Google messages works great for me, messages between anyone with RCS enabled go through with no problems. Don't remember the last time I had an issue. I only have issues with people on iPhones on different carriers from T-Mobile.
    • JonnygATL
      Galaxy S22 thread

      By JonnygATL · Posted

      Has anyone experienced a ridiculous amount of difficulty with Google messages with RCS enabled?  It has been a train wreck for me for the past year so I now use WhatsApp.  That works very well for all of us.... Android and iOS.  
    • iansltx
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By iansltx · Posted

      Probably not worth the fiddling given that that's a few percent of the band. Also, if they really wanted to push my assumption is there are still guard bands in play for the n41 carriers so they could fit two "100 MHz" carriers into 194 MHz anyway. Looks like minimum guard band is less than 1 MHz and a 100 MHz channel is only 273 30 KHz resource blocks, which is a bit over 80 MHz total, so if they really wanted to pull another 5% or so capacity out they could.
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Saw that for a while. Now back to n25 + n71 + n41-100Mhz + n41-90Mhz.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...