Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

MetroPCS metrocell and DAS systems are being repurposed as much as possible for T-Mobile. If they are CDMA/LTE small cells, they are going to be replaced with HSPA+/LTE small cells. If they are DAS, then T-Mobile will just reconfigure them for HSPA+/LTE (since DAS is generally airlink agnostic).

 

They can't be used for Sprint because they are designed for AWS-1. Band 41 is 2496-2690 MHz, while AWS-1 is 1710-1755 / 2110-2155 MHz.

 

Thanks for the explanation.  I figured some equipment would have to be swapped because of the frequency differences, but the NextG fiber and infrastructure is at least airlink agnostic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, no overage charges. Just slowed after using 3GB. With "banking it" now, you can have the extra high speed when you need it few times in the year. Like I said, it's options for people who would benefit. If you don't need it, that's fine. But I think most would rather have one than not.

 

You and I see it differently. I see it half full, you see it half empty. no right or wrong answer. Just different.

 

Of course, and as a wireless industry enthusiast, I can appreciate that option. But having lived through, and selling against Cingular Roll-Over, it's slightly different for me :)

 

Great conversation, that's what this site is all about.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great conversation, that's what this site is all about.

 

That is 100% correct.  This is the only wireless industry related site I know of that I can come to and have constructive discussions about Sprint without all of the mindless bashing that goes on just about everyplace else. 

 

Is Sprint perfect?  Not close and I don't think anybody here thinks that.  But it is nice to have for the most part good discussion without all the noise that serves no constructive purpose. 

 

I think the biggest frustration many of us have right now regarding T-Mobile is the the do no wrong image the tech press is giving them right now while still cutting down Sprint every chance they get.  The smart thing T-Mobile has done is build up several major markets like NYC and SF where many of the tech writers are based to get them on board.  I think that is why you are seeing the deployment strategy shift at Sprint, they know they have to get these big markets up and running right to get get some good word of mouth going.

 

Also remember that many of us are based in the middle of the country where T-Mobile is just about worthless.  I live in a metro of over 800,000 and besides some protection sites on the interstate there is ZERO T-Mobile presence here while Sprint has had dramatic improvement the past 12 months.  So forgive me when I don't think much of T-Mobile, they pretty much ignore my market. (And I am sure many feel that way about Sprint for the same reason.)

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly wish t mobile did move into my area. They are roaming here... Would give us up here more options. Our options here are att, Verizon, cellcom, and us cellular all with really high prices and t mobile would be another nice cheaper option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny. I was just looking at some youtube videos on speed tests and one of them was a TMo vs sprint speed test, with sprint on b41. 

 

The Tmobile test did like 8 down while the sprint test did 20+ down on 2 "Bars" of LTE. One of the comments was, how do you not get speed tests faster than Sprint. I usually get 40+. It's amazing how Tmobiles marketing has brainwashed people into thinking they will get those speeds in every market, every single place, all the time.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny. I was just looking at some youtube videos on speed tests and one of them was a TMo vs sprint speed test, with sprint on b41.

 

The Tmobile test did like 8 down while the sprint test did 20+ down on 2 "Bars" of LTE. One of the comments was, how do you not get speed tests faster than Sprint. I usually get 40+. It's amazing how Tmobiles marketing has brainwashed people into thinking they will get those speeds in every market, every single place, all the time.

That's the point of marketing.
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny. I was just looking at some youtube videos on speed tests and one of them was a TMo vs sprint speed test, with sprint on b41. 

 

The Tmobile test did like 8 down while the sprint test did 20+ down on 2 "Bars" of LTE. One of the comments was, how do you not get speed tests faster than Sprint. I usually get 40+. It's amazing how Tmobiles marketing has brainwashed people into thinking they will get those speeds in every market, every single place, all the time.

 

At the end of the day, no network will get those optimal speeds everywhere, and that's the message that we really need to be sharing to everyone. 

 

Let's focus on consistent speeds, not maximum peak in some areas under the tower with the sun out. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny. I was just looking at some youtube videos on speed tests and one of them was a TMo vs sprint speed test, with sprint on b41.

 

The Tmobile test did like 8 down while the sprint test did 20+ down on 2 "Bars" of LTE. One of the comments was, how do you not get speed tests faster than Sprint. I usually get 40+. It's amazing how Tmobiles marketing has brainwashed people into thinking they will get those speeds in every market, every single place, all the time.

But the speed test app is whitelisted though correct? It takes priority on whatever tower when the app is being used? It shows 40+ but is that the users actual speeds? I'm on b41 and my speeds are between 20 and 30 but it seems more realistic with the speeds depending on the time of day. T-Mobile is a marking genius they grabbed people's attention but they also have embedded into people's minds that you need 30+ in data speeds to have a workable phone.

 

I like T-Mobile as a whole due to them changing the rules but I would rather see my actual speed than some prioritized number. On my mothers T-Mobile iPhone 5s she has 1gb of data but she rarely uses the data on phone so I used up her 1gb (don't judge me) and I got the text about reduced speeds. So I then ran a speed test and I still got results well into 50+ and not the reduced speeds.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by derrph
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, no network will get those optimal speeds everywhere, and that's the message that we really need to be sharing to everyone. 

 

Let's focus on consistent speeds, not maximum peak in some areas under the tower with the sun out. 

 

Yup. For most of the things folks do on a mobile phone, a consistent 5mb or so with low ping will be just fine.  Sprint provides this level of service all over town here now and I rarely have issues anymore streaming radio, loading web pages, ect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup. For most of the things folks do on a mobile phone, a consistent 5mb or so with low ping will be just fine.  Sprint provides this level of service all over town here now and I rarely have issues anymore streaming radio, loading web pages, ect.

I hope that when Sprint launches multiple 20 mhz carriers and CA, that data hogs don't come back to Sprint. I mean, with 3 CA or even with 2 CA, the network can probably handle it....but still. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope that when Sprint launches multiple 20 mhz carriers and CA, that data hogs don't come back to Sprint. I mean, with 3 CA or even with 2 CA, the network can probably handle it....but still. 

Sprint will likely discontinue the unlimited data plans just before those come into place to prevent the data hogs from coming back.  Those of us that stayed with Sprint should be grandfathered in. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny. I was just looking at some youtube videos on speed tests and one of them was a TMo vs sprint speed test, with sprint on b41. 

 

The Tmobile test did like 8 down while the sprint test did 20+ down on 2 "Bars" of LTE. One of the comments was, how do you not get speed tests faster than Sprint. I usually get 40+. It's amazing how Tmobiles marketing has brainwashed people into thinking they will get those speeds in every market, every single place, all the time.

https://plus.google.com/107227855733537515429/posts/ED8mZrnnVRn

 

I posted this in the premier thread but it is just too relevant to this post.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint will likely discontinue the unlimited data plans just before those come into place to prevent the data hogs from coming back.  Those of us that stayed with Sprint should be grandfathered in. B)

I do t think Sprint will ever drop unlimited. They'll just make it a premium service by charging more for it than tiered data.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do t think Sprint will ever drop unlimited. They'll just make it a premium service by charging more for it than tiered data.

Does sprint ever need to drop unlimited with the amount of 2.5 ghz it has??? A cool way I could see them altering this would be to remove unlimited from b25 and b26. If you're on 2.5 ghz, use all the data you want because there is plenty of spectrum

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 using Crapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the speed test app is whitelisted though correct? It takes priority on whatever tower when the app is being used? It shows 40+ but is that the users actual speeds? I'm on b41 and my speeds are between 20 and 30 but it seems more realistic with the speeds depending on the time of day. T-Mobile is a marking genius they grabbed people's attention but they also have embedded into people's minds that you need 30+ in data speeds to have a workable phone.

 

I like T-Mobile as a whole due to them changing the rules but I would rather see my actual speed than some prioritized number. On my mothers T-Mobile iPhone 5s she has 1gb of data but she rarely uses the data on phone so I used up her 1gb (don't judge me) and I got the text about reduced speeds. So I then ran a speed test and I still got results well into 50+ and not the reduced speeds.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There's recent FTC settlement for this issue. TMO will provide a link to do speed test to show true speed if full speed data is use up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do t think Sprint will ever drop unlimited. They'll just make it a premium service by charging more for it than tiered data.

With the amount of spectrum they have, I can actually see this happening. I wonder which carrier will win the race to 5G?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A cool way I could see them altering this would be to remove unlimited from b25 and b26. If you're on 2.5 ghz, use all the data you want because there is plenty of spectrum

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 using Crapatalk

I imagine that that would be a nightmare to implement :/

 

-Anthony

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do t think Sprint will ever drop unlimited. They'll just make it a premium service by charging more for it than tiered data.

 

We shall see.  "Unlimited" data may never go away, but it should carry a premium price, even an ever increasing premium price -- because "unlimited" data is going to see ever increasing usage.  And grandfathered "unlimited" data plans, which are becoming way too cheap by now, should be phased out at the time of device upgrades or contract expirations.

 

Those who need "unlimited" data will have to afford it.  Others will learn to live within their means -- so that they do not detrimentally affect everyone else on a shared resource.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ WI wavelength I hope they keep it but charge more for it

 

if you want this, its easy and available now, just go to att or vz ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope that when Sprint launches multiple 20 mhz carriers and CA, that data hogs don't come back to Sprint. I mean, with 3 CA or even with 2 CA, the network can probably handle it....but still.

I know that the speedtest app creates a stupid pissing contest amongst wireless customers, but I honestly feel that even at the point of multiple band 41 carriers/CA, no user should be allowed max bandwidth. Why not just cap it at a reasonable speed. Let everyone have a fair share of the available bandwidth, instead of one guy pulling 100mbps+ so that he can illegally feed his home ISP needs.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that the speedtest app creates a stupid pissing contest amongst wireless customers, but I honestly feel that even at the point of multiple band 41 carriers/CA, no user should be allowed max bandwidth. Why not just cap it at a reasonable speed. Let everyone have a fair share of the available bandwidth, instead of one guy pulling 100mbps+ so that he can illegally feed his home ISP needs.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

I actually agree with that because t mobile is actually throttling users who actually do illegal downloading ... I like that..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...