Jump to content

SignalCheck - Android app to monitor your Wi-Fi/2G/3G/4G LTE/5G-NR signal strengths


mikejeep

Recommended Posts

I have never looked into it; nobody has ever asked for it, and while I shop on Amazon often, I've never even peeked at their app store. Is there a significant reason why someone would buy an app there instead of through Google Play? Seems like anyone interested in a nerdy app like this would be the Google type.

 

-Mike

 

AFAIK the majority of devices that do not have access to Google Play are Wi-Fi only so I don't think it's a big deal.  There may be a handful of phones and tablets that don't have Google Play but as you said I would imagine people buying those would either root and install Play or just not be interested in SignalCheck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never looked into it; nobody has ever asked for it, and while I shop on Amazon often, I've never even peeked at their app store. Is there a significant reason why someone would buy an app there instead of through Google Play? Seems like anyone interested in a nerdy app like this would be the Google type.

 

-Mike

I have plenty of Amazon Coins, which is free currency. If it was posted there, it would have saved me from purchasing the only piece of software I've purchased since SubSpace in 1996. Well worth my $ though, especially because of the continued support!!
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey Mike I was just wondering if you could explain in lay terms under site hint 022 and sector f means please. Also I enjoy your app. Going to get my mom to buy it too. Thanks

The site hint shows information that has no relevance to most people; it is the app's attempt to calculate a value that cross-references with some engineering information. "Sector F" is the app's best guess as to which CDMA 1X sector you are on. The way it is implemented in the current version of the app works in most Sprint markets; I have since learned of a few other methods (US Cellular, Verizon, and an alternate Sprint method) which will be options available in the next version. Usually the sectors are identified as 1/2/3, but not always. Your Sprint market might use the alternate method coming in the next update (I know that Boston does). Again, it doesn't have a ton of relevance to the average user -- myself included.

 

-Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFAIK the majority of devices that do not have access to Google Play are Wi-Fi only so I don't think it's a big deal.  There may be a handful of phones and tablets that don't have Google Play but as you said I would imagine people buying those would either root and install Play or just not be interested in SignalCheck.

 

That was my initial thought; the app is of limited use on a Kindle, even if it worked properly.

 

I did look into it this afternoon, and there are some undesirable caveats with their Appstore: if you uninstall the Amazon app, anything you installed through it stops working; Amazon has the right to adjust your app's prices as it sees fit; and apps installed through Amazon will periodically attempt to connect to an Amazon server for license verification--if you do not have service, you lose access to the app until you're back in coverage. Not headaches I'm interested in dealing with.

 

I have plenty of Amazon Coins, which is free currency. If it was posted there, it would have saved me from purchasing the only piece of software I've purchased since SubSpace in 1996. Well worth my $ though, especially because of the continued support!!

 

Well I am flattered that I had the honor of pulling that two bucks out of your tightly-clenched fists (I was no different -- I *never* bought apps until I started developing mine; if it wasn't free, I didn't think I needed it), but for the reasons I listed above, Mom will have to save those Amazon coins for something else. ;) Thanks for the very kind words though!!

 

EDIT: (Oops, I confused a couple of posters there.. but I'm leaving it, because there's nothing better than a Mom joke ;))

 

-Mike

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been seeing a lot more confusion lately about [CDMA 800 | 1X 800 | 800 SMR | CDMA1X800SMR] as it becomes more widespread, and I think the way SignalCheck displays it might be fueling the fire. So I'm throwing this out to everyone for an opinion.. any opposition to changing the CDMA 1X label to always show "1xRTT", and changing the provider to display "Sprint 800" when appropriate instead? That would keep it consistent with how I intend to identify Sprint LTE bands, and (hopefully) cut back on the misinformation.

 

Any/all opinions/ideas are welcome; if you're just going to "me too" something, just give the appropriate post a 'Like'. No need to clutter the thread with repetition.

 

Thanks,

-Mike

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike how about this.

 

1x RTT 1900 

 

1x RTT 800 

 

That should help people from getting confused and letting them know that both are for voice service.

 

People that do not visit this site that buy your app just to be curious are going to get confused when they see "Sprint 800" under provider thinking they are connected to 800 LTE.  Plus with the different MCC-MNC floating around for LTE I would personally leave "Sprint" as the provider.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike how about this.

 

1x RTT 1900

 

1x RTT 800

 

That should help people from getting confused and letting them know that both are for voice service.

 

People that do not visit this site that buy your app just to be curious are going to get confused when they see "Sprint 800" under provider thinking they are connected to 800 LTE. Plus with the different MCC-MNC floating around for LTE I would personally leave "Sprint" as the provider.

I don't see how they'd be confusing it with band 26 LTE. LTE has its own spot in signal check. I'd think people who are going to be using signal check wouldn't be the type to mix up 1x RTT 800, and band 26 LTE.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Edited by kojitsari
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been seeing a lot more confusion lately about [CDMA 800 | 1X 800 | 800 SMR | CDMA1X800SMR] as it becomes more widespread, and I think the way SignalCheck displays it might be fueling the fire. So I'm throwing this out to everyone for an opinion.. any opposition to changing the CDMA 1X label to always show "1xRTT", and changing the provider to display "Sprint 800" when appropriate instead? That would keep it consistent with how I intend to identify Sprint LTE bands, and (hopefully) cut back on the misinformation.

 

Any/all opinions/ideas are welcome; if you're just going to "me too" something, just give the appropriate post a 'Like'. No need to clutter the thread with repetition.

 

Thanks,

-Mike

Is there not a way to determine if it's connected to 1xRTT or 1xA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a way to get rid of the extra data icon, usually dashes, when in 1x only mode? I use this mode a lot of my Nexus5. If I exit SCP and open it again it looks fine but kind of a pain.

 

I thought this was a bug because when it connects to LTE the extra icon goes away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike how about this.

 

1x RTT 1900 

 

1x RTT 800 

 

That should help people from getting confused and letting them know that both are for voice service.

 

People that do not visit this site that buy your app just to be curious are going to get confused when they see "Sprint 800" under provider thinking they are connected to 800 LTE.  Plus with the different MCC-MNC floating around for LTE I would personally leave "Sprint" as the provider.  

 

I'm thinking along the lines of consistency; when connected to one of the "new" Sprint LTE bands, I am leaning toward having the LTE provider name showing "Sprint B26" or "Sprint B41" -- the "LTE" heading will not change. Perhaps I should consider changing that instead, but I like using the Provider name because then it can be easily seen in the notification pulldown or logs.

 

Another consideration to keep in mind is that this is not a Sprint-only app, there are many users on other providers. And Sprint users do roam. So when Sprint User X bumps over to roaming on Verizon or elsewhere, it will then say '1xRTT' again. I feel that three possible labels just adds to the confusion.

 

I don't think the use of 800 in the 1X provider name is going to have anyone infer that they are connected to LTE 800. A user who understands what a 800/1900/B26/B41 label is will not be confusing 1xRTT with LTE. One thing is fairly certain, the average SignalCheck user is a nerd :)

 

I sincerely appreciate the feedback!

 

-Mike

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how they'd be confusing it with band 26 LTE. LTE has its own spot in signal check. I'd think people who are going to be using signal check wouldn't be the type to mix up 1x RTT 800, and band 26 LTE.

 

Ha, apparently you beat me to my own punch!

 

Is there not a way to determine if it's connected to 1xRTT or 1xA?

 

I must admit, I'm not in the loop with 1xAdvanced, and have not put a lot of effort into figuring it out. As far as the app goes, 1xA info has not been asked for, and I have plenty of other features keeping me busy at the moment so I have not pursued it. I see it mentioned around here from time to time, but nothing I happened to come across seemed to explain it in much detail. I do know that I am not aware of any way to determine if a connection is 1xA, as there is no such network type in the Android spec.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you leave the provider listing like it is currently and just make it also report what band you're connected to for all providers (referring to the LTE side of things here)? I get its not as useful for other carriers but it would consistent across the board and still allow people to identify what band they're on. I just see saying its sprint b41/26 is redundant because the people who will want the info will know b41/26 is sprint anyways without the carrier label being there too.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a way to get rid of the extra data icon, usually dashes, when in 1x only mode? I use this mode a lot of my Nexus5. If I exit SCP and open it again it looks fine but kind of a pain.

I thought this was a bug because when it connects to LTE the extra icon goes away.

It does on LTE but I don't use LTE much anymore.

 

If you enable Preferences > Status Bar Icons > Hide Duplicate 1X icon, that should only show one status bar icon, even if you have the "Main" and "1X" icons enabled. Is that not happening? Or am I misunderstanding the issue?

 

EDIT: Ahhh well what I just described _used_ to work.. I just played around with it on my N5, and apparently it done got broke somewhere along the way.. to the bug list it goes.

 

-Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you leave the provider listing like it is currently and just make it also report what band you're connected to for all providers (referring to the LTE side of things here)? I get its not as useful for other carriers but it would consistent across the board and still allow people to identify what band they're on. I just see saying its sprint b41/26 is redundant because the people who will want the info will know b41/26 is sprint anyways without the carrier label being there too.

 

I've mentioned it before; unfortunately Android does not provide a mechanism to get the band/frequency of any connection. Anywhere that the app is showing a band is doing so by evaluating available data (i.e. SID, PLMN, GCI, etc.) and determining if it matches a pattern that has already been identified as unique to a particular provider and band.

 

I think it would be useful all providers, not just Sprint; I'm often asked by users on other networks to add this feature. Luckily, we have a heck of a userbase here, and enough data has been collected to identify some of the patterns that Sprint uses (CDMA 800, LTE B25/26/41). I don't have enough info on any other networks to add that information yet.

 

But your idea of adding a separate "Band:" display (or "Band Class:", in the case of 1X) might be do-able, it just adds a little more clutter to the screen. I like a clean look, and make an effort to keep everything visible without scrolling.. that's easy on a Note or N5, but older devices don't have quite as much real estate -- and a lot of them are still out there.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've mentioned it before; unfortunately Android does not provide a mechanism to get the band/frequency of any connection. Anywhere that the app is showing a band is doing so by evaluating available data (i.e. SID, PLMN, GCI, etc.) and determining if it matches a pattern that has already been identified as unique to a particular provider and band.

 

I think it would be useful all providers, not just Sprint; I'm often asked by users on other networks to add this feature. Luckily, we have a heck of a userbase here, and enough data has been collected to identify some of the patterns that Sprint uses (CDMA 800, LTE B25/26/41). I don't have enough info on any other networks to add that information yet.

 

But your idea of adding a separate "Band:" display (or "Band Class:", in the case of 1X) might be do-able, it just adds a little more clutter to the screen. I like a clean look, and make an effort to keep everything visible without scrolling.. that's easy on a Note or N5, but older devices don't have quite as much real estate -- and a lot of them are still out there.

 

-Mike

I'm with you on the clean look aspect. It just seems that having the current 1x RTT change back and forth between 1x 800 would cause even more issues. Hence why I'm thinking maybe something small added in to differentiate between them all would be a better option(removing the need to sort of "relearn" the way the app would be present info to you). For instance maybe "1x RTT [800]" instead of the current "1x RTT." Only when applicable of course :P

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how I can tell when I'm connected to 1x800 on the status bar without having to pull the menu down. It would be nice if it were possible to also determine the LTE band in that way , especially while driving.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you enable Preferences > Status Bar Icons > Hide Duplicate 1X icon, that should only show one status bar icon, even if you have the "Main" and "1X" icons enabled. Is that not happening? Or am I misunderstanding the issue?

 

EDIT: Ahhh well what I just described _used_ to work.. I just played around with it on my N5, and apparently it done got broke somewhere along the way.. to the bug list it goes.

 

-Mike

 

Thanks.  Another thing that would be nice is an icon to show the PCI in the status bar.  It would only be two icons on most devices.  I'm sure you'll have fun making 504 icons right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike how about this, under the 1x RTT section of your app you think it would be easier to add "Band." i.e

 

Provider: Sprint     Band:1 or 10 

Provider: Verizon   Band: 0 

 

Isn't the band class something most phones spit out?  That way it always says 1x RTT at the top and doesn't switch back and forth to 1x RTT to 1x 800.  Just a thought... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike how about this.

 

1x RTT 1900

 

1x RTT 800

 

Drop the "RTT."  Honestly, after a dozen years, I no longer even recall what the "RTT" stands for, and most of us just refer to "1X" in some way, shape, or form.

 

So, let the uppercase or lowercase debate rage, but I would recommend the following:

 

1X 1900

1X 800

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike how about this, under the 1x RTT section of your app you think it would be easier to add "Band." i.e

 

Provider: Sprint Band:1 or 10

Provider: Verizon Band: 0

 

Isn't the band class something most phones spit out? That way it always says 1x RTT at the top and doesn't switch back and forth to 1x RTT to 1x 800. Just a thought... ;)

Similar to what I was starting to think of.. but like I previously mentioned (pay attention!! ;)), there is no mechanism to get the band/frequency for any connection. Any band display in the app is a result of evaluating other data. As I discover different providers' structures, I can add it. But it's not as simple and straightforward as I wish it was.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Another thing that would be nice is an icon to show the PCI in the status bar. It would only be two icons on most devices. I'm sure you'll have fun making 504 icons right?

Oh yes I couldn't think of anything better!!!! ROFL.. actually I caught wind of a method to convert text to a graphic on the fly. I don't think it works because of the way icons have to be coded, but I'm going to try it out anyway. An overhaul of all the status bar icons is next on the agenda after I finish the logging bits.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...