Jump to content

PRL 01138?

bitslizer

By bitslizer
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

bitslizer Member Level: 3G EVDO

bitslizer

Posted
Posted

Hi guys I've been trying to figure out if my EVO 3D is using the 800mhz, I live in the chicago area which I read should have 800mhz turned on

 

I did a PRL update and now its showing 01138? I tried googling but can't find anything on this, I'm not sure if it affect anything but I've been using MeanRom ICS on my EVO 3D

 

so can anyone tell me if 01138 is the correct PRL with 800mhz? and also how to check to see if my phone is actually using 800mhz?

digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

Oh wow... I haven't seen the 01xxx series from Sprint in a LONG time! Thought it was just a test build once. Could you pull this PRL with QPST? It's the only way to determine what it does.

bitslizer Member Level: 3G EVDO

bitslizer

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Oh wow... I haven't seen the 01xxx series from Sprint in a LONG time! Thought it was just a test build once. Could you pull this PRL with QPST? It's the only way to determine what it does.

 

here you go, it won't let me upload with those extension, so just remove the .txt

PRL.prl.txt

digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

here you go, it won't let me upload with those extension, so just remove the .txt

 

Hmmm... you don't happen to be in Gulfport or something like that?

bitslizer Member Level: 3G EVDO

bitslizer

Posted
  • Author
Posted

West/SW Suburban Chicago, there's a Gulfport IL, but that's by the Iowa border and I've never been there to my knowledge, or were you asking about Gulfport in Mississippi?

 

anyhow why do you ask if i'm in gulfport? is that where the PRL should be used in or something?

Rawvega Member Level: 4G LTE

Rawvega

Posted
Posted

*Small threadjack* I just noticed that my Note II updated to PRL 55010. Is this a recent development for everyone or am I just late in noticing it? I seem to recall that the Note II, iPhone 5 and maybe another device were stuck on PRL 55009 for the longest time.

Rawvega Member Level: 4G LTE

Rawvega

Posted
Posted
and also how to check to see if my phone is actually using 800mhz?

 

##DEBUG#

 

1X Engineering screen

digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

West/SW Suburban Chicago, there's a Gulfport IL, but that's by the Iowa border and I've never been there to my knowledge, or were you asking about Gulfport in Mississippi?

 

anyhow why do you ask if i'm in gulfport? is that where the PRL should be used in or something?

 

No, it just has some weird NID SID combinations that I remember seeing a couple of years ago and this one guy in Gulfport, LA had the PRL.

 

A quick glance shows this PRL with 800SMR support but unlike the LTE devices, this one has the 800SMR set at a lower priority than PCS. So you will only use 800SMR when PCS can not be found.

digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted
*Small threadjack* I just noticed that my Note II updated to PRL 55010. Is this a recent development for everyone or am I just late in noticing it? I seem to recall that the Note II, iPhone 5 and maybe another device were stuck on PRL 55009 for the longest time.

 

Hmm.. Maybe they finally added 800smr in.

 

Will have to get autoprime on it to work his prl pulling magic.

 

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

 

WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

The Future is here. PRL 1138.

 

THX1138.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 1
jefbal99 Member Level: LTE Advanced

jefbal99

Posted
Posted

I got 55110 on my Note 2 as well, I haven't pulled a PRL forever, but if I ever get done patching servers for work, I'll try to get the software reinstalled.

PDXmike Member Level: 4G WiMax

PDXmike

Posted
Posted

*Small threadjack* I just noticed that my Note II updated to PRL 55010. Is this a recent development for everyone or am I just late in noticing it? I seem to recall that the Note II, iPhone 5 and maybe another device were stuck on PRL 55009 for the longest time.

 

I'm still on PRL 55009, so my guess is recent development.

SpenceSouth Member Level: 4G WiMax

SpenceSouth

Posted
Posted

Has anyone on an EVO LTE had any issue pushing a PRL to their phone? I keep getting an "Online Connection Error" in QPST.

Kaixor Member Level: 1x Advanced

Kaixor

Posted
Posted (edited)

*Small threadjack* I just noticed that my Note II updated to PRL 55010. Is this a recent development for everyone or am I just late in noticing it? I seem to recall that the Note II, iPhone 5 and maybe another device were stuck on PRL 55009 for the longest time.

 

Looks like a recent development, I just got PRL 55010 on my iPhone 5

 

I wonder what are the differences...

Edited by Kaixor
Rawvega Member Level: 4G LTE

Rawvega

Posted
Posted

Me too. I can't seem to pull it on the Note2. Keeps giving me an error.

 

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

Yeah, I've also tried getting it off of my Note II using QPST with zero success. It keeps telling me "roaming list receive failed". Is that the error that you're seeing as well?

autoprime Member Level: 1x Advanced

autoprime

Posted
Posted

bitslizer, what type of Sprint plan do you have? Standard consumer plan? Business plan? Something else? Do you recall which PRL you had before 01138?

 

digiblur, do you see any reason to use PRL 01138 over anything else? I guess I'm wondering... should I bother trying to be able to pull this myself?

 

PRLs 55010 and 56010 below...

55010_Sprint_PRL.zip

56010_Sprint_PRL.zip

  • Like 1
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

It is a weird numbering scheme... it is a 800SMR non-LTE PRL. The one posted above was fine. I should have the diffs up by tomorrow.

 

The 56010/55010 updates pretty much mimic the 25010 updates except the 55/56 ones do NOT have 800SMR yet.

 

My post from XDA:

 

Meh.... still no 800SMR support for 56xxx and 55xxx. Guess someone at Sprint doesn't like iPhone 5, Note2, and PhotonQ LTE users. Or maybe there is an issue with the iPhone and 800SMR.

 

Not sure what took Sprint so long to come out with these as they really match the 25xxx updates...and includes the same glaring errors. Tsk tsk tsk..

digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I've also tried getting it off of my Note II using QPST with zero success. It keeps telling me "roaming list receive failed". Is that the error that you're seeing as well?

 

Yep, same error. DFS won't pull it either.

Kaixor Member Level: 1x Advanced

Kaixor

Posted
Posted

 

Not sure what took Sprint so long to come out with these as they really match the 25xxx updates...and includes the same glaring errors. Tsk tsk tsk..

 

 

Errors? Like what?

digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

 

Errors? Like what?

 

1x records tied to missing evdo records. Records in the wrong geo.. Optimizations gone wrong.. Optimizations missing. It's what you get from automated tools.

 

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

 

  • Like 1
jefbal99 Member Level: LTE Advanced

jefbal99

Posted
Posted

1x records tied to missing evdo records. Records in the wrong geo.. Optimizations gone wrong.. Optimizations missing. It's what you get from automated tools.

 

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

You need to send a 100% correct PRL to Sprint, maybe they'll gift you a few months of free service.

Deval Member Level: LTE Advanced

Deval

Posted
Posted

So humor me this...I'm connected to a site which I know is not broadcasting 1x on 800mhz, but a quick look at ##debug# and 1x engineering shows band class as PCS (LG Optimus).

 

I'm assuming if I was connected to 1x on SMR, the band class would show 10.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Spent a lot of time in Westchester this weekend, specifically Yonkers and White Plains. I mapped three AT&T Nokia -> Ericsson conversions. I was super impressed with T-Mobile's macro density and not so much with AT&T's. In Yonkers it seems like T-Mobile macros outnumber AT&T macros 3 to 1 and in White Plains, 2 to 1. Another surprise was the lack of small cells on AT&T in both cities. While Cellmapper shows White Plains having no small cells, I did manage to find one in the Church Street neighborhood. While it's only one, it's an indication to me that T-Mobile intends on expanding n41 density with small cells in the city. On the other hand, in Yonkers T-Mobile has a ton of LTE small cells but none of them have been upgraded to 5G yet as far as I can tell. Crown Castle has been moving super fast in NYC and Long Island to upgrade and install new 5G small cells so I can only assume it's either a permitting or backhaul issue that's stopping them from moving full steam ahead there. — — — — — Came across this cool site in Yonkers with Verizon, T-Mobile, and Dish present.
    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Other two sectors finally installed. Hopefully it goes live soon though I know from past experience that these new builds can take weeks and in some cases months to go live.
    • dkyeager
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Quimby Mountain Band  
    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Mayor Quimby
    • Paynefanbro
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Which is not surprising given that Verizon’s entire 5G network consists of only C-band and mmWave in most of their coverage area. I’m more surprised that despite having a 5G network that’s almost entirely made up of only two super fast and super high capacity bands, both T-Mobile and AT&T showed higher average speeds on 5G according to OpenSignal. I would’ve expected Verizon to be a close second to T-Mobile but it was a blowout. 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...