Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE Market - West Iowa/Nebraska Market (Omaha/Council Bluffs/Lincoln)


TrentAllen

Recommended Posts

I decided to stay with Sprint.  I'm going to add another line to my business contract and upgrade one phone to an iPhone 5 Friday.  I'm looking forward to enjoying the LTE service in Omaha/Bellevue/Papillion as it becomes available over the next month or two.

 

I have a question unrelated to LTE, towers, etc. if I may:

 

Do you guys have Applecare+ for your iPhones or use Sprint's $11/month insurance?  I have multiple Apple computers and have always had AppleCare for them and they've always taken care of any issues quickly and never given me any hassle on claims.

 

For the phones the price is significantly different since AppleCare+ is only $99 plus $49 per incident vs. $11/month for Sprint's plan.

I'm thinking the AppleCare will probably serve my needs and save me money?

 

Thanks,

Tracer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

great job who ever is doing sensorly in lincoln. if someone has time, can you see how far east it will go?

 

From my Sensorly mapping and LTE Discovery use the fringe is hwy 77 North and I80. If you look at these locations I just grabbed tonight, I got the LTE hits bit it was so weak it didn't even register on the phone network icon. That GPS location is right at the 56th street exit and there is nothing east of 77, at least not on 80.

 

Posted Image

 

I'll get more tomorrow night as I'll be driving back into town in should get some good details then as I'll be taking I80 all the way to hwy 77 south and into town. I may be able to grab the furthest West. :)

 

Sent from my HTC d3rpONE using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

great job who ever is doing sensorly in lincoln. if someone has time, can you see how far east it will go?

 

What you see is what there is. I went out Pioneers and Old Cheney the other night and those results show up on Sensorly. I didn't perform a run to the east on Van Dorn, but I'd imagine that between 98th and 112th is about the extent. Still not bad. If you're on a hill crest you'll be good. If a valley, maybe. After 112th it dropped, and I think that the Stevens Creek watershed is pretty flat further east so you're not likely to get any further than what I've mapped.

 

Having stated all that, I haven't bothered to make a run out O Street or A Street, so maybe if I'm feeling inspired I give those two major arterials a shot. I'd imagine the coverage is about the same. 112th Street will be the furthest east it's likely to stretch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as an update to what I found in Lincoln, there really isn't much more along I80. 56th exit and just a tad bit between there and 9th Street exit. I did Sensorly it though so nothing to add for now.

 

Sent from my HTC d3rpONE using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in Omaha, NE and Sprint very recently(in the past 4 weeks) set up 2 towers, one right by my work. YAY! Anyways, when i upgraded my phone yesterday the Sprint rep said it was just installed and is in a "beta testing stage" and may more may not come offline intermittently.

 

Question: For anyone that had a 4g tower in 'beta' stages and now its up fully functional, how long does it take for them to fully complete this stage?

 

As you can see below, im getting around 4-5mbps steady download. Although its rather slow for 4G, I am insanely satisfied because I can stream HD youtube, browse anything internet related, etc without any problems. I did have a couple hiccups on a HD video, but everything is mostly great.

 

8uwcWas.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not in beta stage. If it is on and you can connect to it then it is upgraded. Your speedtest is dependent on the LTE signal strength which your bars do not show.

 

Download the SignalCheck app to see the real LTE signal strength in your status bar.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not in beta stage. If it is on and you can connect to it then it is upgraded. Your speedtest is dependent on the LTE signal strength which your bars do not show.

 

Download the SignalCheck app to see the real LTE signal strength in your status bar.

 

SignalCheck showed about 53% signal strength.. is 4-5mbps pretty average for sprint LTE? My friend has AT&T and he gets about 20mbps average

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

It's not in beta stage. If it is on and you can connect to it then it is upgraded. Your speedtest is dependent on the LTE signal strength which your bars do not show.

 

 

Download the SignalCheck app to see the real LTE signal strength in your status bar.

 

 

SignalCheck showed about 53% signal strength.. is 4-5mbps pretty average for sprint LTE? My friend has AT&T and he gets about 20mbps average

With 53% signal strength, I'd say that is around normal. However, a measure in dBm RSRP would be better for us to equate. What is your friends signal with 20Mbps. He probably is using a fully deployed network.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With 53% signal strength, I'd say that is around normal. However, a measure in dBm RSRP would be better for us to equate. What is your friends signal with 20Mbps. He probably is using a fully deployed network.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

My Phone:

RSRP: -106dBm(15asu)

RSRQ: -11db, SNR: 18.2db

 

My Friends Phone (AT&T) and his is showing about 60-70ish percent strength

 

RSRP: -99dBm(19asu)

RSRQ: -8db, SNR: 17.2db

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's not in beta stage. If it is on and you can connect to it then it is upgraded. Your speedtest is dependent on the LTE signal strength which your bars do not show.

 

 

 

 

 

Download the SignalCheck app to see the real LTE signal strength in your status bar.

 

 

 

 

SignalCheck showed about 53% signal strength.. is 4-5mbps pretty average for sprint LTE? My friend has AT&T and he gets about 20mbps average

With 53% signal strength, I'd say that is around normal. However, a measure in dBm RSRP would be better for us to equate. What is your friends signal with 20Mbps. He probably is using a fully deployed network.

 

 

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Since we're "kinda new" to this new fangled thing called LTE :D what does signal strength vs distance from tower look like? I understand being closer doesn't mean better but I'd just like to get an idea (if it's even known).

 

I hadn't seen anyone mention that particular app until today so I'm gonna add that to my LTE tools folder. Robert, is there a tool that measures dBm RSRP that you recommend?

 

Sent from my HTC d3rpONE using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With 53% signal strength, I'd say that is around normal. However, a measure in dBm RSRP would be better for us to equate. What is your friends signal with 20Mbps. He probably is using a fully deployed network.

 

And AT&T has a relatively puny PCS 1900 MHz based footprint in Nebraska.  Unfortunately, Omaha is outside the top 50 markets, so we have not seen any market share data.  But I would be willing to wager an educated guess that VZW is way out in front, Sprint is second, and AT&T is a distant third.  Cricket, USCC, and T-Mobile would make up the remaining market share, but T-Mobile operates only a license protection network and does not actually sell service in Nebraska.

 

Long story short, AT&T is operating a 10 MHz FDD LTE network in Omaha with likely fewer subs than Sprint.  So, with twice the carrier bandwidth and less loading, higher speeds on AT&T are likely.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And AT&T has a relatively puny PCS 1900 MHz based footprint in Nebraska.  Unfortunately, Omaha is outside the top 50 markets, so we have not seen any market share data.  But I would be willing to wager an educated guess that VZW is way out in front, Sprint is second, and AT&T is a distant third.  Cricket, USCC, and T-Mobile would make up the remaining market share, but T-Mobile operates only a license protection network and does not actually sell service in Nebraska.

 

Long story short, AT&T is operating a 10 MHz FDD LTE network in Omaha with likely fewer subs than Sprint.  So, with twice the carrier bandwidth and less loading, higher speeds on AT&T are likely.

 

AJ

I can't speak for Omaha but in Lincoln, I actually think that AT&T might be fourth behind USCC. The GSM family doesn't have a very good build out in Nebraska, from what i've seen, so being able to have native coverage or roam on either Sprint or Verizon would be a big deal.

 

As much is it might make GSM fanboys mad, Nebraska is CDMA2000 territory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

With 53% signal strength, I'd say that is around normal. However, a measure in dBm RSRP would be better for us to equate. What is your friends signal with 20Mbps. He probably is using a fully deployed network.

 

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

My Phone:

RSRP: -106dBm(15asu)

RSRQ: -11db, SNR: 18.2db

 

My Friends Phone (AT&T) and his is showing about 60-70ish percent strength

 

RSRP: -99dBm(19asu)

RSRQ: -8db, SNR: 17.2db

A -105 or worse really isn't a good signal. I could see 5 megabit or so with that signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't speak for Omaha but in Lincoln, I actually think that AT&T might be fourth behind USCC. The GSM family doesn't have a very good build out in Nebraska, from what i've seen, so being able to have native coverage or roam on either Sprint or Verizon would be a big deal.

 

As much is it might make GSM fanboys mad, Nebraska is CDMA2000 territory. 

 

Oh, you are absolutely right.  Omaha has been an interesting case study for me for over a decade.

 

About 10 years ago, of any city in the world, Omaha may have had the greatest number of CDMA2000/cdmaOne networks:  Alltel (Aliant), VZW (US West/AirTouch), Sprint, Qwest, and Cricket.  Then, USCC acquired some PCS spectrum and even entered the fray.  But I am unsure whether USCC's entrance and Qwest's departure overlapped.  I think they did, in which case, Omaha had fully six CDMA2000/cdmaOne networks at one point.

 

Moreover, GSM did not enter the Omaha market until very late, circa 2002, with the original AT&TWS' GSM overlay, followed by T-Mobile's license protection network, circa 2003.  So, for a number of years, Omaha was a GSM black hole.  Even today, the best thing that GSM has going for it in Nebraska is only Viaero.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this is a dumb question, but what is GSM? and what is CDMA2000?

Well, one of the two is pronounced "jizzum."

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And AT&T has a relatively puny PCS 1900 MHz based footprint in Nebraska.  Unfortunately, Omaha is outside the top 50 markets, so we have not seen any market share data.  But I would be willing to wager an educated guess that VZW is way out in front, Sprint is second, and AT&T is a distant third.  Cricket, USCC, and T-Mobile would make up the remaining market share, but T-Mobile operates only a license protection network and does not actually sell service in Nebraska.

 

Long story short, AT&T is operating a 10 MHz FDD LTE network in Omaha with likely fewer subs than Sprint.  So, with twice the carrier bandwidth and less loading, higher speeds on AT&T are likely.

 

AJ

I think your pretty much right on, ATT LTE is very good in Omaha its not hard at all to hit high 50's download. Most I people I know in Omaha are on VZW followed by Sprint then by US Cellular. I just know a couple on AT&T. Tmobile is a joke with coverage, altho they do have 42MB rolled out and if your close to a tower you can get LTE like speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this is a dumb question, but what is GSM? and what is CDMA2000?

GSM, the way I used it, is referring to the 3GPP family of 3G technology. AT&T and T-Mobile are the two "GSM" carriers (or operators, for the people who try to avoid confusion) while Sprint and Verizon are using the 3GPP2's CDMA2000. Also if you someone say CDMA they are likely referring to CDMA2000 in the same way that if you see someone say GSM they are likely referring to UMTS (the HSPA family).

 

Although you could argue that none of this really matters any more because, as far as I know, the 3GPP2 is dead, joining forces with the 3GPP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Yes! That does keep it from wandering off Dish and most importantly, reconnecting immediately (at least where there is n70). Thanks!
    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...