Jump to content
mbaseball3

Network Vision/LTE - Orange County Market (Anaheim/Santa Ana/Irvine/Huntington Beach)

Recommended Posts

It would be nice if Sprint could add 1.9/2.5 GHz small cells inside the Disney parks. But I think around that area due to the huge amount of people around the park needs some massive capacity upgrades to make it useable inside the park.

 

Hopefully HPUE will help with relieving some capacity inside the park if the 2.5 GHz sites nearby Disneyland assuming it can reach inside the park.

Although I'm not 100% sure, I believe AT&T owns the DAS at Disneyland. Someone can chime in and correct me if I'm wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disney started upgrading their WiFi throughout the California Disney Land Parks a couple years ago in preparation for the introduction of the same Magic Band equipment that is in use in the Florida Disney World parks.  The Magic Band project is significantly behind its original schedule since much of the work can only be performed on it at night when the parks are closed.  From what I have heard, some (maybe most) of the funding for expanding the Magic Band project has been redirected to security improvements and to the new Star Wars park changes.  The Magic band readers that get installed at the beginning of every ride are configured to work over WiFi if a wired network can not be easily run to that location.

 

The Magic Band project is very expensive and requires a large amount of equipment to be installed, tested, and proven to be reliable under all conditions.  Customers will not tolerate putting their Magic Band up to a reader and having that reader not working due to a WiFi overload or outage.  Once the WiFi part of that project is completed, Most Disney Land park guests will be on a usable WiFi network.  That frees up the macro cellular network capacity in the entire area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they plan on making service better in the park? How is service with other carriers?

From what I know, Verizon is the only carrier that doesn't suck at Disney. Even then, their service is far from superb as well, regularly slowing down or dropping to 3G in certain areas. Back when Pokemon Go was still the hotness, anyone not on a Verizon phone needed to tether to one of our friends' phones on Verizon just to get the game to load. Otherwise, good luck doing anything over data. That being said, I can't speak for AT&T since I only know from a Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon point of view. This was also during Pokemon Go's peak, so there were hundreds (thousands?) of people at Disney doing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I'm not 100% sure, I believe AT&T owns the DAS at Disneyland. Someone can chime in and correct me if I'm wrong.

That is correct and I think it  has another five years or so, my friends that go to the parks and have ATT say it's no better, they don't have enough capacity and if they try to periscope or something like that it will surely lock up. I do know the wifi the cast members use has improved a ton over the last few months, they were scanning all the tickets and uploading photos of everyone on their first entrance and it has gone to lightning fast and used to be a major drag so ATT has done something on that level and I think they are working on some sort of public wifi as the park is using their mobile app to enhance the experience quite a bit more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noticed this week at work that my phone has been connecting to B26. It may have been sooner than this week but I had Signal Check off from displaying in my status part. My N6P likes to bounce between B41 and B26 depending on where I am (I work in a big building moving throughout it all day). My location is near the 5 Freeway on Orangethorpe (Northern OC).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noticed this week at work that my phone has been connecting to B26. It may have been sooner than this week but I had Signal Check off from displaying in my status part. My N6P likes to bounce between B41 and B26 depending on where I am (I work in a big building moving throughout it all day). My location is near the 5 Freeway on Orangethorpe (Northern OC).

Let me guess. 11 GCI ending.

 

Nope. No B26.

 

It's Nokia 10x10 B25 With gci ending of 11/12/13 which is confusing the signal apps since 11 ending is used for B26 in Samsung land.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me guess. 11 GCI ending.

 

Nope. No B26.

 

It's Nokia 10x10 B25 With gci ending of 11/12/13 which is confusing the signal apps since 11 ending is used for B26 in Samsung land.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

 

Just checked my screenshot. My dream was crushed haha. YUP, ends in 11......

 

Edit. Explain this to me. When it says "B26: it's better than when it says B25. I'm assuming it's just a different cell site connected to, however, when it does say "B26" it's faster, around 13 Mbps where as B25 is unusable.

Edited by HTCandroid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked my screenshot. My dream was crushed haha. YUP, ends in 11......

 

Edit. Explain this to me. When it says "B26: it's better than when it says B25. I'm assuming it's just a different cell site connected to, however, when it does say "B26" it's faster, around 13 Mbps where as B25 is unusable.

10x10

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked my screenshot. My dream was crushed haha. YUP, ends in 11......

 

Edit. Explain this to me. When it says "B26: it's better than when it says B25. I'm assuming it's just a different cell site connected to, however, when it does say "B26" it's faster, around 13 Mbps where as B25 is unusable.

 

It is a wider 10x10 LTE channel, which means it has higher peak speeds and more capacity than the original 5x5 G Block channel. The 10x10 channel also has slightly better edge of cell performance, so you may get LTE in a few marginal areas where you did not get LTE before. The 10x10 channel is a second carrier, in addition to the first carrier which will show up as LTE Band 25. The "Band 26" is not necessarily a different tower, just a different carrier (with more capacity).

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a wider 10x10 LTE channel, which means it has higher peak speeds and more capacity than the original 5x5 G Block channel. The 10x10 channel also has slightly better edge of cell performance, so you may get LTE in a few marginal areas where you did not get LTE before. The 10x10 channel is a second carrier, in addition to the first carrier which will show up as LTE Band 25. The "Band 26" is not necessarily a different tower, just a different carrier (with more capacity).

 

So my question is 10x10 channel...is this being rolled out across LA, Orange County and San Diego. Basically the entire SoCal area ? I live in lake Elsinore CA but work in San Juan Capistrano I could really use 10x10. I'm not sure if 10x10 will improve the remote area I work at. I get decent LTE signal outside but inside my work building it's anyone's guess who gets signal or no signal mostly roam inside

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So my question is 10x10 channel...is this being rolled out across LA, Orange County and San Diego. Basically the entire SoCal area ? I live in lake Elsinore CA but work in San Juan Capistrano I could really use 10x10. I'm not sure if 10x10 will improve the remote area I work at. I get decent LTE signal outside but inside my work building it's anyone's guess who gets signal or no signal mostly roam inside

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I seen it in Corona, havent seen it in OC at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So my question is 10x10 channel...is this being rolled out across LA, Orange County and San Diego. Basically the entire SoCal area ? I live in lake Elsinore CA but work in San Juan Capistrano I could really use 10x10. I'm not sure if 10x10 will improve the remote area I work at. I get decent LTE signal outside but inside my work building it's anyone's guess who gets signal or no signal mostly roam inside

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am picking it up in the 92677 Laguna Niguel near Target

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am picking it up in the 92677 Laguna Niguel near Target

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

That's pretty close. My job is in San Juan Capistrano. But the nearest tower is like 5-6 miles away so my coverage outside is decent but inside buildings is bismal. I'm hoping 10x10 helps inside until band 26 is cleared sometime in 2037.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's pretty close. My job is in San Juan Capistrano. But the nearest tower is like 5-6 miles away so my coverage outside is decent but inside buildings is bismal. I'm hoping 10x10 helps inside until band 26 is cleared sometime in 2037.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

We have to wait until 2037 in SoCal?!?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have to wait until 2037 in SoCal?!?!

 

/sarcasm

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have to wait until 2037 in SoCal?!?!

Sprint might not even be around by that time.

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

/sarcasm

 

That was oddly a specific number so I couldn't tell. I would have used something like 2099 or 3000....

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

San Diego also has it, I was near the border in San Ysidro and my phone displayed band 26 so this 10x10 is live down south.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in Irvine right now & Signal Check Pro is falsely reporting band 26 as well.

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like the Southern California market is getting 10X10 on the 1.9. Will this help fill in low gap areas ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got it again in Fullerton today at Costco.

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got it again in Fullerton today at Costco.

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

 

Better signal inside ? I don't was on 3G in that Costco last time

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Better signal inside ? I don't was on 3G in that Costco last time

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Inside Costco, I still had LTE.

 

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So joke of the day....I follow sprint coo on Facebook and he posts about the Magic box....I then commented on how bad the tower spacing is on the 1.9 in socal and wished they would resolve the band 26 issue...some guy commented back saying band 26 was live in parts of socal already. I died laughing as I know that's not remotely true....that would have breaking news.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So joke of the day....I follow sprint coo on Facebook and he posts about the Magic box....I then commented on how bad the tower spacing is on the 1.9 in socal and wished they would resolve the band 26 issue...some guy commented back saying band 26 was live in parts of socal already. I died laughing as I know that's not remotely true....that would have breaking news.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Totally agree the cell spacing for 1.9 is horrendous in So Cal. HPUE and B26 would barely make up for it. Sprint needs to add a ton of macro amd small cells in So Cal to improve coverage.

 

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • And its back up today. Speeds seem good for 10x10. I did test calling, I was able to get my phone to ring while on SA N71 but no audio passed either way. Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
    • Wrong perks program. This is akin to the Sprint Works program, where Sprint and your company have a bit of a deal that gets you a discount on your line. For example, I have a $5 discount for the time being thanks to the Sprint Works deal with my employer. 
    • The *vast* majority of markets had at least 60Mhz deployed, more if you count small cells and magic boxes. There were only a few areas where they were limited to 40Mhz due to spectrum issues.
    • I was in Greenville, NC last week and finally go to experience T-Mobile's network somewhere that wasn't New York for an extended period of time. Just like NYC, T-Mobile's 600MHz spectrum is extremely underdeployed. There are about 15 T-Mobile sites in the entire city and T-Mobile has deployed 600MHz on only 1 of them. Sprint on the other hand has tri-banded nearly every site. Another issue is that Greenville has pretty bad site density on all networks but the issue is exacerbated on T-Mobile by the fact that they lack Band 12 licenses for pretty much all of Eastern NC. The only lowband license they have is 600MHz and they haven't really put it to use at all. The good news is that speeds weren't that bad at all. Speeds were around 20Mbps on average with peaks of about 65Mbps. Deploying 600MHz likely isn't a priority for T-Mobile in Greenville and the towns surrounding it because on their end the network performance looks fine however, deploying 600MHz would fill in a lot of coverage gaps and give a much more reliable signal overall. Until then, Verizon and AT&T will have T-Mobile beat on coverage thanks to them having lowband on every site and U.S. Cellular will have them beat because U.S. Cellular has a bunch of extra sites that no other carrier uses in the region that provide them with much better coverage than any other carrier in the area.
    • Think T-Mobile will bid on this 5G spectrum?: https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/2307275/white-house-and-dod-announce-additional-mid-band-spectrum-available-for-5g-by-t/ “The White House and Department of Defense announced today that 100 megahertz (MHz) of contiguous mid-band spectrum, in the 3450-3550 MHz band, will be available for 5G by the end of the summer.“ More info: https://breakingdefense.com/2020/08/pentagon-gives-up-huge-slice-of-spectrum-for-5g/ “The White House formally made the request in April. Roughly 200 technical experts from all four armed services, the Office of Secretary of Defense, and the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy studied the problem for 15 weeks. The FCC, which has already endorsed the plan, will start auctioning the spectrum off in December 2021, Kratsios said, with commercial use beginning “as soon as mid-2022.”” I’m sure AT&T/Verizon will fight hard for it.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...