Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - East Michigan Market (Detroit/Flint/Ann Arbor/Tri-Cities)


ReyBanz

Recommended Posts

You guys should not complain at all some of us still ant even been heard of (Toledo) being only 60-70 miles south of Detroit , also I'm pretty sure that Detroit is being worked on as well. This list pretty much means that they will have launchable amount of service in the next few months. Detroit is going to take some time in order to get to that point then if they didnt have enough towers done to cover Detroit, then people would complain. Sorry if you guys ment it in a non negative way, but it will come soon and it'll be well worth the wait.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys should not complain at all some of us still ant even been heard of (Toledo) being only 60-70 miles south of Detroit , also I'm pretty sure that Detroit is being worked on as well. This list pretty much means that they will have launchable amount of service in the next few months. Detroit is going to take some time in order to get to that point then if they didnt have enough towers done to cover Detroit, then people would complain. Sorry if you guys ment it in a non negative way, but it will come soon and it'll be well worth the wait.
. I agree

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

saginaw? midland? what about Detroit, Flint? Still great to see announcement.

 

The same amount of work in Midland barely makes a dent in Detroit, however work will be going on in Detroit as well, it's just going to take longer. Once more work has been done, and they think they are a little closer to having a launchable amount of coverage in the bigger cities, they will be added to the list as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys should not complain at all some of us still ant even been heard of (Toledo) being only 60-70 miles south of Detroit , also I'm pretty sure that Detroit is being worked on as well. This list pretty much means that they will have launchable amount of service in the next few months. Detroit is going to take some time in order to get to that point then if they didnt have enough towers done to cover Detroit, then people would complain. Sorry if you guys ment it in a non negative way, but it will come soon and it'll be well worth the wait.

 

I'm not complaining, just amused to see the more remote areas being recognized. I agree with your prediction and reasoning as well.

 

Sorry about living in Toledo, OH. My condolences.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not complaining, just amused to see the more remote areas being recognized. I agree with your prediction and reasoning as well.

 

Sorry about living in Toledo, OH. My condolences.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

 

Lol. Toledo is that bad.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I'm not complaining, just amused to see the more remote areas being recognized. I agree with your prediction and reasoning as well.

 

Sorry about living in Toledo, OH. My condolences.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

Its cool I just want this fourm to keep on the positive side and not rants. I have enough of them on the Facebook page for this site of people from here complaining and moderating it for Rob, which is funny at times with people....and thanks Toledo used to good for biss but I think it went down the toilet.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Lol. Toledo is that bad.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

i think sprint is scared to come to Toledo and have Samsung put subs down here with all the crime lol...I'm kidding of course I just think think with how small our market is doing like 6 towers in Toledo would pretty much cover the city. Guess me and Ryan are rooting for you guys up north scince that's about the closest well get to LTE for the time being.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping Ann Arbor gets decent LTE coverage by around September because I'd like to go to university of Michigan next year

 

So if LTE doesnt hit A2 then you won't be going to UofM? :scratch:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed the purple keeps creeping out farther from Howell. Is that still the same towers and people are just getting readings farther away? Or is it spread to Brighton lol

 

That amount has been the same for a handful of days now. Last I knew was that LTE in Howell was active on only one tower. I wanted to drive around Howell this past weekend but my plans were derailed. I hope to get down there again this upcoming weekend so I can map some more plus check other towers in the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The newest press release is great news. Finally some work other than just Howell. Atleast we now have a little more hope for it to be soon in the metro Detroit. It will take time since they cannot just realease it in such a populated area, but I am happy with the progress.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There still is only one tower in Howell with active LTE. Pretty much the boundary you see on Sensorly in Howell along and north of I-96 is what you get at the moment. I don't know what the situation is south of 96. My travels do not take me that way nor it seems other Sensorly users as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sure wish I could do more with Sensorly on my iPhone than just view existing coverage maps... :td: C'mon Apple..

 

Once I was locked to an LTE signal, I held onto it until just past the Grand River exit in Brighton (exit 145.. a good 5.8 miles away as the crow flies). I wish I could have brought it all the way back to A2 with me!

 

 

** I'm hoping if I take the liberty of goading Apple ahead of time, I can squelch any further and/or more severe :P

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...