Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - SF Bay Market


breakaes

Recommended Posts

Sounds ugly.  All this out of Sprint's control?  They can't just hire more subs to push harder?

 

It's certainly less than ideal. I've only ever gotten usable LTE from one site in SF, and only with no eCSFB. They're working on it, but it'll be (very optimistically) another month before anything tangible. 3G has gotten better though, but they're tweaking it a lot so it goes in and out with respect to speed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah today was even more horrible than normal. lte was completely hosed on my wife's {singleband} q10. And lte only mode on my s5 yielded absolutely nothing. Literally nothing. This was in fidi. But 3g did seem a little bit better.

 

I do think some b41 sites do have ecsfb enabled. One site near Hayes Valley kept me on b41 for 10 blocks.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do remember no new lte sites have been fired up yet since 3g cluster launch. All yall are getting are the ones that have been online since forever.

 

They still have yet to do lte integration in that cluster for sites that have backhaul delivered.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of LTE on my N5 downtown today. Unfortunately it seems that they only enabled eCSFB on the old sites, so things are actually worse. At least more people are on the dead LTE, so forcing 3G is semi-effective.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of LTE on my N5 downtown today. Unfortunately it seems that they only enabled eCSFB on the old sites, so things are actually worse. At least more people are on the dead LTE, so forcing 3G is semi-effective.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

3g is also better because of nv1.0 finished on all those new sites right?

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3g is also better because of nv1.0 finished on all those new sites right?

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Still going to be crap if the sites are connected to t1.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still going to be crap if the sites are connected to t1.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I thought all the new 3g approved sites in sf now had upgraded bandwidth.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought all the new 3g approved sites in sf now had upgraded bandwidth.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

 

3G = network vision equipment up and running.

 

4G = network vision equipment running on upgraded backhaul. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3G is somewhat improved due to the equipment upgrades (especially in the signal department, the site at the tip of Market is an absolute boomer now), and somewhat in speed (probably due to non-integrated, but installed backhaul). But, there's still not enough capacity for great 3G speeds even on great backhaul if the airlink is saturated (Fidi at lunch).

 

Those sites fly late at night though. The high capacity site near my apartment regularly tears at 2-2.6mbps at night, but during the Beyonce concert, I could barely send a text, and facebook messages were touch and go at best.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if it used to be a purple pin and now yellow(or green) it has upgraded backhaul, right? That's what I meant by 3g approved.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

 

Yes, if the 3G and 4G is accepted, then the new backhaul is upgraded to the 3G too.  If a site is 3G only accepted, then it is not connected to new backhaul yet.  If it were, the 4G LTE would be live also.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

got a new b41 tower somewhere in Foster City.  Sometimes I wonder if they are doing any work on b41 anymore.  I've been waiting for them to upgrade some clear sites a mile from the Levi stadium.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

got a new b41 tower somewhere in Foster City.  Sometimes I wonder if they are doing any work on b41 anymore.  I've been waiting for them to upgrade some clear sites a mile from the Levi stadium.

 

There's a good article describing in detail the efforts made to allow all 68K fans access to video and internet over wifi.  

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/03/the-49ers-plan-to-build-the-greatest-stadium-wi-fi-network-of-all-time/

 

Most of it is about Wi-Fi, but here are a few cool details:

* 680 access points (1 for every 100 fans), mostly on 802.11ac 5GHz 20MHz channels

* No bridging of access points, so all IP traffic is effeciently routed

* 40-GBit fiber backbone

* 1700 Bluetooth "beacons", unclear if it's limited to Apple's iBeacon technology

* Order food/drinks via app, have runners deliver it to your seat

 

The relevant part to our group is this snippet:

"Besides building its own Wi-Fi network, the team will build a carrier-neutral distributed antenna system to boost cellular signals within the stadium."

 

I don't know anyone involved with that stadium, but would be interesting to learn what Sprint and other carriers have deployed there.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has a b41 site just outside the stadium, and another b41 west of it.  Not sure about any DAS.

 

Don't see any DAS in the stadium on our map.  Maybe Sprint was too busy with the upgrades to participate in the DAS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't see any DAS in the stadium on our map.  Maybe Sprint was too busy with the upgrades to participate in the DAS?

 

It may not be in the map, but they've been announced as being part of the neutral hosted DAS at Levi's.  It also seems like Sprint has been working on joining the existing DAS setups at AT&T Park and Oakland Coliseum but I haven't seen anything about them trying to join the one at Oracle Arena.

 

http://www.extenetsystems.com/aboutus/Stadium_Tech_Report_Q2_2014.pdf

 

http://www.coliseumauthority.org/archive/2013/31_130517_455.pdf

 

http://www.coliseumauthority.org/archive/2012/31_121214_436.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew there was a DAS in AT&T park! It's mapped on the network.sprint.com maps, but not on the sponsor maps. The signal from it goes out to neighboring King St. Whenever there's a game or a concert though it seems that the neighboring macro cells are hit hard anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew there was a DAS in AT&T park! It's mapped on the network.sprint.com maps, but not on the sponsor maps. The signal from it goes out to neighboring King St. Whenever there's a game or a concert though it seems that the neighboring macro cells are hit hard anyway. 

 

If you want to post the details in one of the market sponsor threads, we should be able to get the DAS added to the maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew there was a DAS in AT&T park! It's mapped on the network.sprint.com maps, but not on the sponsor maps. The signal from it goes out to neighboring King St. Whenever there's a game or a concert though it seems that the neighboring macro cells are hit hard anyway. 

 

I'm not sure if its operational yet.  All 3 games I've been to this year, the service has been atrocious, at least for data.  I've had to connect to wifi just to browse the web.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may not be in the map, but they've been announced as being part of the neutral hosted DAS at Levi's. It also seems like Sprint has been working on joining the existing DAS setups at AT&T Park and Oakland Coliseum but I haven't seen anything about them trying to join the one at Oracle Arena.

 

http://www.extenetsystems.com/aboutus/Stadium_Tech_Report_Q2_2014.pdf

 

http://www.coliseumauthority.org/archive/2013/31_130517_455.pdf

 

http://www.coliseumauthority.org/archive/2012/31_121214_436.pdf

Robert have exact location and info on DAS etc for sprint. he just choose to not put then out for people to see as of right now because it's a lot of private entities that operate it.

 

If you're lucky though you may discover one as sprint is putting a few of em on the network upgrades map page.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may not be in the map, but they've been announced as being part of the neutral hosted DAS at Levi's.  It also seems like Sprint has been working on joining the existing DAS setups at AT&T Park and Oakland Coliseum but I haven't seen anything about them trying to join the one at Oracle Arena.

 

http://www.extenetsystems.com/aboutus/Stadium_Tech_Report_Q2_2014.pdf

 

http://www.coliseumauthority.org/archive/2013/31_130517_455.pdf

 

http://www.coliseumauthority.org/archive/2012/31_121214_436.pdf

 

From the first PDF you linked, I found some juicy bits relevant to Sprint. On page 12, when talking about DAS upgrade at AT&T Park earlier this year Feb-March, the say:

"Part of this year’s DAS renovations include a 

new room specifically being built for Sprint’s
DAS equipment, a sort of re-arrange-the-house
construction project that saw the ballpark wall
off half its painting services workshop to make
space for Sprint’s gear. During our visit we saw
workers putting up the racks that will hold the
Sprint head end gear, as thick fiber cables
snaked in the doorway"
 
Let's hope some Spark is coming or will come with that upgrade!!
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice. Where was the b41? Did you have any ecsfb issues in the city? Today I actually was able to keep lte in parts where I usually fall back to 3g. So I think ecsfb issues are finally being cleared up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice. Where was the b41? Did you have any ecsfb issues in the city? Today I actually was able to keep lte in parts where I usually fall back to 3g. So I think ecsfb issues are finally being cleared up.

No Ecsfb issues. I didn't have to put my phone on lte only mode. It connected by itself outside the embarcadero bart station

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...