Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - SF Bay Market


breakaes

Recommended Posts

Whoa is that a berkeley site in the latest acceptance rounds. I don't even know what to say or think anymore.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

I didn't even notice. :lol:

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I didn't even notice. :lol:

 

 

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

 

 

At first I thought it was oakland. Then I zoomed in and said wait a minute! I can't even find that one in berkeleys permit site. Whatever! Keep em coming berkeley! You too sf!

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That isn't 1x speeds. And it doesn't need to be accepted to be on.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

The download is <144kbps, and the upload test suttered and stalled out for a little while so I wouldn't consider the upload to be accurate. It was cool to see the download flatline at 128kbps though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So excited. At my folks place in benicia and noticed 800smr up in the notification area. It connected to the smr even though there is an airrave in the same room as me. Weird.

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 2

 

uploadfromtaptalk1372481603458.jpg

uploadfromtaptalk1372481616627.jpg

uploadfromtaptalk1372481630795.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The PRL for Android phones prefers SMR over PCS, so if there's a usable SMR signal, even if weaker than another PCS signal, Android phones will connect to it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Xparent ICS Blue Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The PRL for Android phones prefers SMR over PCS, so if there's a usable SMR signal, even if weaker than another PCS signal, Android phones will connect to it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Xparent ICS Blue Tapatalk 2

 

PRL for majority Android devices have it PCS and SMR set as same priority. The Note 2's have a temporary 2000 PRL that restricts SMR due to some issue but should be shorted out relatively quickly. The Iphone 5's have PCS set as higher priority than SMR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is something up with the LTE in the South SF area?  I once was able to get 10-25Mbps download/ 5-10Mbps upload consistently over a few months and now at the same sites I get .5-2Mbps download/ 5-6Mbps upload.  And this is with very strong signals 4-5 bars (-61dB).  This has been the case in multiple areas.

Edited by nebody00
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Is something up with the LTE in the South SF area?  I once was able to get 10-25Mbps download/ 5-10Mbps upload consistently over a few months and now at the same sites I get .5-2Mbps download/ 5-6Mbps upload.  And this is with very strong signals 4-5 bars (-61dB).  This has been the case in multiple areas.

 

Most likely the tower your connected to is overloaded as its neighboring towers doesn't have LTE yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ the NHRA Nationals this weekend in Sonoma with both 800 1x-a and LTE with highly usable service. My service lags at most events in the bay with high density. Considering sprint connection with racing, possible COW or just NV locking it down. Any thoughts?

2013-07-28_15-24-33.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone in SF testing the new Tri-Band Mifi? Would love to see how fast they are on Band 41.  :tu:

 

I haven't really had a chance to go around SF testing the mifi. I've tried it in two places in SF now and haven't seen any Band 41. Im testing it in places I know I have good WiMax signal. It seems to have a much better antenna and radio than my LG Optimus G, because even with a poor signal (-108dBm) I was able to get around 6mbps on Band 25.

 

I am about to leave for a conference in Las Vegas so I'm going to reactivate my WiMax modem. I'll keep looking for Band 41 when I get back.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't really had a chance to go around SF testing the mifi. I've tried it in two places in SF now and haven't seen any Band 41. Im testing it in places I know I have good WiMax signal. It seems to have a much better antenna and radio than my LG Optimus G, because even with a poor signal (-108dBm) I was able to get around 6mbps on Band 25.

 

I am about to leave for a conference in Las Vegas so I'm going to reactivate my WiMax modem. I'll keep looking for Band 41 when I get back.

Or you can just leave it with me and I'll do extensive testing in sf. :)

 

Sent from my Android HP Touchpad using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

There's lots of 800 Voice in South Bay.  The problem now is that my Galaxy S3 drops a call when switching between 1900 and 800 towers.  The 101 & 237 interchange is particularly a bad spot for calls getting dropped.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah still haven't gotten 800 in sf. And I was right near the epa tower that was 800 accepted but I never got it. I know its out there. Just gotta go out and find it.

 

Sent from my Android HP Touchpad using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah still haven't gotten 800 in sf. And I was right near the epa tower that was 800 accepted but I never got it. I know its out there. Just gotta go out and find it.

 

Sent from my Android HP Touchpad using Tapatalk 4

Your phone will not likely look for 800 unless it completely runs out of 1900 signal. Or if you do a PRL update while in 800 coverage.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's lots of 800 in northern San Jose.  I'd guess there's not enough accepted towers to give you a good 800MHz coverage.

 

Yeah still haven't gotten 800 in sf. And I was right near the epa tower that was 800 accepted but I never got it. I know its out there. Just gotta go out and find it.

Sent from my Android HP Touchpad using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...