Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Cincinnati Market


ohioratrodder

Recommended Posts

The Westside of Cincinnati from Werk & Glenway & down are seeing 4G LTE. I picked a few signs while shopping in the Western Hill Kroger as well as leaving to work this morning. I will be back down later this afternoon to get network speed tests and to map progress. If any one here lives in the West side of cincy, please help confirm this.

I was out today and like yesterday the Dent North tower at the Twin Lanterns is fired up. I also found the tower in Cheviot near St. Martin of Tours church also on LTE. That was a nice supprise. Mapped a lot today. How long does it usually take to show up on the maps?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did see on the Sensorly map, some deep purple in the Dent area.

 

Dun dun dun…dun dun du dun…dun dun dun…dun dun...

 

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was out today and like yesterday the Dent North tower at the Twin Lanterns is fired up. I also found the tower in Cheviot near St. Martin of Tours church also on LTE. That was a nice supprise. Mapped a lot today. How long does it usually take to show up on the maps?

At Chivelle's on Harrison in Dent.

a8y7a5un.jpg

 

Edit: I meant to quote B-Man

S4 Mini & Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OldCoastie  & kdupes Thanks you two for confirming it for me! Was a bit busy and wasn't in the ares, but glad to see that progress is made in the Westside. I hope there's more to come  :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At Chivelle's on Harrison in Dent.

a8y7a5un.jpg

 

Edit: I meant to quote B-Man

S4 Mini & Tapatalk

With this recent speed test is there any way to identify the band and is this normal speed to be expected? I thought speeds would be a bit faster than this reading. I'm a novice on subject and the site, but I would like to gain as much insight so that I could help contribute on the search of LTE in my area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With this recent speed test is there any way to identify the band and is this normal speed to be expected? I thought speeds would be a bit faster than this reading. I'm a novice on subject and the site, but I would like to gain as much insight so that I could help contribute on the search of LTE in my area. 

I can tell you it was Band 25.  The engineering screen will tell you.  Also, if you can get the GCI in SignalCheck Po, it can be a hint to which band.  As for the download speeds, I'm not sure what the max throughput is for the different bands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can tell you it was Band 25.  The engineering screen will tell you.  Also, if you can get the GCI in SignalCheck Po, it can be a hint to which band.  As for the download speeds, I'm not sure what the max throughput is for the different bands.

+1. My phone only uses LTE band 25, reguardless of what the idiots at Motorola say. But that is another story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mental Note: It's a perfect day in the Tri-state to continue these upgrades in the Tri-state...[emoji106][emoji106]

 

Ask and ye shall receive...

 

Just laid down a bunch of purple all around the main business district in Madeira. Band 25. Speeds were around 30mbps down. Wasn't LTE last time I checked, which was probably a few days ago.

 

This was on a Galaxy S5, not forcing LTE.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since 7978 beechmont went live with lte a couple weeks ago, there has still been a lot of wprk being done on the tower. New cables ran up and down it last week, today new cabinets being installed (talked to one of the contractors he said they cost about a million each? Also confirmed they were pulling out 3g cabinets and replacing them with 4g) i guess these are just stages of a tower upgrade or is it a false lte signal due to the new panels, but cannot get tje benifit of true lte (b41? Hopefully?) Until all the equipment jas been installed

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been seeing a lot of new 1x800 voice signals since last night and during my commute this morning.

 

S4 Mini & Tapatalk

How can you confirm this? I am really interested to know? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been seeing some amazing speeds off my local tower the last week or so on B25! This is off the tower I posted pics of a while back with the very first known 8T8R antennas. Some of you will remember that. This test is on a GS3. Pretty impressive speeds for B25 you think?

 

quguzu7u.jpg

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been seeing some amazing speeds off my local tower the last week or so on B25! This is off the tower I posted pics of a while back with the very first known 8T8R antennas. Some of you will remember that. This test is on a GS3. Pretty impressive speeds for B25 you think?

 

quguzu7u.jpg

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Excellent results on your speed test, this is really promising that network vision in cincy is coming. I wonder if progress is being reported on the report ran every other week or so? When I zoom up to the cincy market, I find a lot out of the 275 Loop has 1/2 or 2/3's of the upgrades. While the inside of the 275 loop has still a ways to go. Let's see what comes from the upgrades on the coming months!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Cincy" can be a bit deceiving in regards to my test. I'm in the Cincy market, but my tower is about 50 miles/1 hr North of Cincy.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Cincy" can be a bit deceiving in regards to my test. I'm in the Cincy market, but my tower is about 50 miles/1 hr North of Cincy.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Case point, I think it has been A very slow roll-out but excited to know it's rolling down the 75/71. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...