Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Cincinnati Market


ohioratrodder

Recommended Posts

There are guys up on top the tower today in Bridgewater Falls area (129 and Byp 4). I didn't get back here to post, but the last time I posted about a truck up there it turned out to be AT&T.

 

I believe they're up on the sprint rack, so hopefully we'll see some new panels up this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why that tower was ever marked in progress. As far as I could tell there was never any evidence that it was actually in progress. It definitely doesn't have the panels for NV up yet, but I feel like this is the same crew I saw down on Rt 4 in Hamilton the week of valentines day.

 

I'll be keeping an eye on it daily this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why that tower was ever marked in progress. As far as I could tell there was never any evidence that it was actually in progress. It definitely doesn't have the panels for NV up yet, but I feel like this is the same crew I saw down on Rt 4 in Hamilton the week of valentines day.

 

I'll be keeping an eye on it daily this week.

which rack is the sprint rack on that tower? I've had a hard time telling I'm not that great at spotting them yet

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just went by the Bridgewater tower. They have one new NV panel up on the tower! Based on what I saw when they were upgrading the Rt 4 tower, they should be finished by the end of the week.

pics?

 

Sent from my HTC0P3P7 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went back by the Bridgewater tower today, three NV antennas are up now.

 

Busy day in the Hamilton and Fairfield area for tower climbers. Noticed a climber up on what I think is a Verizon tower off rt 4 in Hamilton. Then saw some climbers up on the tower Sprint is on right off rt 4 in Fairfield, they were not on the Sprint rack though and that tower has had NV antennas up for some time.

 

Found a rope hanging from the tower on Pleasant Ave in Fairfield just north of John Gray, no one on that tower, did see guys at the base of it but it has multiple carriers. No NV antennas on this tower, but I may be able to check back tomorrow. It's located inside a gated storage place so can't get very close to see equipment on the ground.

 

I'll also try and get to the tower near Hamilton Mason and Lesourdsville West Chester Rd to see if anything thing has been done.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signal Check is reporting 1x800 from the Wasserman Rd tower in Hamilton as well. If so I'm really hoping lte is knocking at our doors.

I know when 800 went live in Trenton, LTE followed about 2 weeks later. Be nice to have lte everywhere.

 

Sent from my HTC0P3P7 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live close to the one on third st that's in the scrap yard, it is NOT putting out 1x800, never has that I've seen and I can literally see it from my house

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

signal check showed 1x 800 from 555 3rd street. That's the scrap yard.

 

Sent from my HTC0P3P7 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also know 3rd St tower is putting out 1x800 as is the tower off RT 4 in Hamilton, near McDonalds. Did ride down to Fairfield, no towers down there with 800 yet. It would appear all towers inside the Hamilton City limits are 1x800 now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

my service keeps dropping.. this is in Fairfield and in the west side.... hoping this is a sign that we are getting some more upgrades... kind of irritating that I'm getting so many missed calls since the phone won't ring..... sign of progress I guess

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4G LTE lasted to mile marker 39  way before the winton road exit then dropped to 3G.. a guy on sprints wall warren dixon

posted this feb 26th

 

Warren E Dixon Jr. Sprint is currently upgrading its infrastructure nationwide to Network Vision 4GLTE / enhanced 3G....
Cincinnati is currently being upgraded....During the upgrade process, you will experience service interruptions until more towers are upgraded, beta tested, then brought back online....
Cincinnati
Status: Partial LTE Launch/NV Upgrades Continuing
NV Sites Accepted = 51%
LTE Sites Accepted = 31%
Anticipated LTE Launch = Spring 2014 (Greenville/Springfield launched 1/2014)
Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = May 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can drive back by and take a screen shot to prove it if you like.

 

Sent from my HTC0P3P7 using Tapatalk 2

not calling you a liar simply saying I'm two hundred yards away and not getting 1x800 nor have I ever, maybe they were testing it when you went by or maybe I don't know how to use signal check but I've not seen 1x800 from that tower yet, I just took this shot maybe I'm looking at it wrong Lord knows I'm no pro at this stuff Posted Image

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...