Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands Market


Gab2012

Recommended Posts

Jaja i cant post yet. I sent it to robert. Robert can confirm it. Sorry' date=' give me additional days to obtain more evidence. Right now Ponce is down. Probably we will to have lte on next days or week[/quote']

 

I can confirm. I have the screenshot. Cannot share based on request. But I can confirm it.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's great news! I wanted to ask, if anyone knows and can help me: I live in Ponce, Villa Paraiso to be precise, it's located in "la carretera 132" very close to Jardines del Caribe (the biggest sector in Ponce) and it's one of the blind spots i mentioned earlier with speed about 25-40 kps. Can anyone tell me which tower is the one i'm connected to from this area? Also, i would like to know about the one in the Plaza del Caribe area, as my college is right in front of it (PUCPR) 'cause it's another blind spot and a place where i really need acces to the internet.

Thanks in advance.

Edited by JeanPi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW! What's even more confusing is this goes against everything I've read and even tested. Not sure how LTE is working on the stock PRLs.
You arent wrong. We need a new prl. The lte is working right now but we are waiting for the new prl. The info come from inside.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW! What's even more confusing is this goes against everything I've read and even tested. Not sure how LTE is working on the stock PRLs.

 

Its scary when the people who know the most about this stuff around here are baffled...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Its scary when the people who know the most about this stuff around here are baffled...

 

Scary? How so? We are honest and share what we know and our observations.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You arent wrong. We need a new prl. The lte is working right now but we are waiting for the new prl. The info come from inside.

 

Ahhh...gotcha. I did send a few people the corrected PRL for PR. They shouldn't have to wait. Unless the inside info means the sites are blocked but their device is specially authorized.

 

Its scary when the people who know the most about this stuff around here are baffled...

 

I didn't know all the facts about this apparent "inside" info. I've been wrong before on things before and admitted it (MCC/MNC PRL records for LTE enabling to name one).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scary? How so? We are honest and share what we know and our observations.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

 

I didn't know all the facts about this apparent "inside" info. I've been wrong before on things before and admitted it (MCC/MNC PRL records for LTE enabling to name one).

 

Was totally joking ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Ahhh...gotcha. I did send a few people the corrected PRL for PR. They shouldn't have to wait. Unless the inside info means the sites are blocked but their device is specially authorized.

 

 

 

I didn't know all the facts about this apparent "inside" info. I've been wrong before on things before and admitted it (MCC/MNC PRL records for LTE enabling to name one).

The person who took a speedtest has a normal galaxy nexus with normal prl. Maybe in other areas the sites are blocked but not in carr 30 caguas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Galaxy Nexus had no problems connecting to LTE with a foreign PRL. Only my GS3 had problems.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...