Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The time, 6 hours (at least, don't know when the SS was done) prior.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks like it was screenshot on wifi but the test results show cellular.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thos speeds are too high for band 25. Unless it was band 41? Screenshot shows 25.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

I tooks this months ago in mount dora. I waited until I was around wifi to post it because I didnt want to get in a car accident. Safety first. But I assure you that was on band 41. Not band 25 or wifi.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow!  I have never seen anything faster than 72Mb/s Down here in the Carolinas, plus our latency is 55-60ms or higher most of the time, regardless of which tower/site/sector or phone is used.  That right there is nice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow!  I have never seen anything faster than 72Mb/s Down here in the Carolinas, plus our latency is 55-60ms or higher most of the time, regardless of which tower/site/sector or phone is used.  That right there is nice.

 

 

The latency thing is weird. It's very location dependent though. In NYC, latency on 3G is almost never above 55ms and on LTE it ranges from 14ms to 35ms on average. In Boston however the only time I see pings below 40ms is in the middle of the night. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They won't be different than any other 2xCA capable devices that we have a number of examples of (including the 6s and 6s+).

 

Once 3xCA is officially online, then we'll see a difference. 

 

Seeing as there are 45 towers up and running with 3xCA in Orlando, figure some folks are hitting them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing as there are 45 towers up and running with 3xCA in Orlando, figure some folks are hitting them.

Phones still need a software push to enable it.

 

In Samsung markets, 3xCa an 3rd b41 carrier has been live since early summer but no one has access to 3xCA other than select sprint workers. Ie. Guenther mentioning getting 200 mbps speed in his reddit AMA on his iPhone / galaxy devices....

 

So the wait continues but it's getting close... :)

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phones still need a software push to enable it.

 

In Samsung markets, 3xCa an 3rd b41 carrier has been live since early summer but no one has access to 3xCA other than select sprint workers. Ie. Guenther mentioning getting 200 mbps speed in his reddit AMA on his iPhone / galaxy devices....

 

So the wait continues but it's getting close... :)

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Any news on the spectrum swap between sprint, verizon and tmobile?

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found a co located site with clear 2500 on top then the other 3 carriers and then sprint with nokia b41 and b25 on bottom. Sprint would be wise to relocate that equipment to where clear is when clear is decommissioned.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I found a co located site with clear 2500 on top then the other 3 carriers and then sprint with nokia b41 and b25 on bottom. Sprint would be wise to relocate that equipment to where clear is when clear is decommissioned.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Off topic do you know how Sprint Coverage is at or in universal studios in Florida? Never been there I'm going on vacation in a few months

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Off topic do you know how Sprint Coverage is at or in universal studios in Florida? Never been there I'm going on vacation in a few months

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

I haven't been since April due to extreme heat there. I am going to halloween horror nights in 2 weeks but back in April they had cells there at every park all with b25×2 carriers and b26. Band 41×2 came from a Sprint site with great speeds farther away and a clear single 41 site that was always congested. I'm excited to see if they are using 10x10 instead of second carriers there and I want to see if clear ever recieved a second carrier and the sprint 41 has a 3rd carrier.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't been since April due to extreme heat there. I am going to halloween horror nights in 2 weeks but back in April they had cells there at every park all with b25×2 carriers and b26. Band 41×2 came from a Sprint site with great speeds farther away and a clear single 41 site that was always congested. I'm excited to see if they are using 10x10 instead of second carriers there and I want to see if clear ever recieved a second carrier and the sprint 41 has a 3rd carrier.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Do they have contiguous Spectrum there?

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

25x2 coverted to 10x10 at Universal and islands of adventure. 52380f23f7107fa456ae2f9749c43290.jpg10109abf50c3e16566b24461f0883fbf.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

So does that mean the G block is still 5x5?

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...