Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Philadelphia Metro Market (including Lehigh Valley/Reading)


HappyHappy

Recommended Posts

From what I've seen, 3G can be accepted as complete without backhaul upgrades. Also, Nolan said backhaul still wasn't hooked up.

 

Yeah, the way it's unwritten is just a little unclear...it makes it sound as thought he sites that have between 150 and 500 MBit connections are "ready" and that CC, UC, and other high traffic areas already have 1GBit.

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fiber backhaul connections I am assisting in installing, we are not connecting to the MMBTS itself; that is another contractor's job (me and my friend was talking about how there was still several other contractors doing things that him and his team can do quite easily and in one shot). As it sits now, just about all of the Philadelphia Metro Area is done on the Physical side with only a handful of sites not done because of either permits or locations, the fiber backhaul is in full steam although behind schedule since all of the Alcatel-Lucent contractors and techs was sent to Long Island to rebuild after Sandy. After the fiber is hooked up, all that is left is someone to come by with a laptop and do final programming before the tower is lit up.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fiber backhaul connections I am assisting in installing, we are not connecting to the MMBTS itself; that is another contractor's job (me and my friend was talking about how there was still several other contractors doing things that him and his team can do quite easily and in one shot). As it sits now, just about all of the Philadelphia Metro Area is done on the Physical side with only a handful of sites not done because of either permits or locations, the fiber backhaul is in full steam although behind schedule since all of the Alcatel-Lucent contractors and techs was sent to Long Island to rebuild after Sandy. After the fiber is hooked up, all that is left is someone to come by with a laptop and do final programming before the tower is lit up.

Do they got to use the laptop to flip on LTE or just the 3G+backhaul?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked to Sprint and they told me the tower by the Giant at Flowers Mills in Langhorne, PA has been down since end of November and that they were working on it.

 

I would say they are pretty bad at fixing things. It has been 3 months since November there must be some progress on a single tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say they are pretty bad at fixing things. It has been 3 months since November there must be some progress on a single tower.

 

I called in August about a tower by my house in the Art Museum Area and they said there was an existing ticket from July with an estimated resolution of October 19. :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called in August about a tower by my house in the Art Museum Area and they said there was an existing ticket from July with an estimated resolution of October 19. :unsure:

 

It is typically true. Sprint do not address issues fast enough. There are tickets all over Philly and they do their least to satisfy customers in one of the biggest metropolitan city in the country.

 

You know, I guess people do what is best for them. Cheap Sprint unlimited data or go for costly AT&T and Verizon.

 

I bet it will take them another 4 months to get LTE ready.

Edited by HappyHappy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is typically true. Sprint do not address issues fast enough. There are tickets all over Philly and they do their least to satisfy customers in one of the biggest metropolitan city in the country.

 

You know, I guess people do what is best for them. Cheap Sprint unlimited data or go for costly AT&T and Verizon.

 

I bet it will take them another 4 months to get LTE ready.

 

Is it possible for you to say anything that isn't negative? Pretty sure it's not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With NV rollout in Philly active it's possible they're scrapped fixing existing tickets since all newcequipment is just going to be rolled out anyway.

 

It is not true. They are still fixing things but I think they are trying to do the LTE upgrades to the towers as well. That's why there are so many tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa! Whoa! There is no need to escalate to this point. Get it back in line, please.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, Boosted, you're sitting in Harrisburg BATHED in LTE while we're struggling to get 0.1Mbit speeds here in Philly. It is seriously not fun.

 

Hey Steve and everyone else,

 

If you are experiencing terrible speeds please address these issues to Sprint's Customer Care as well. A lot of people twit or post on blogs saying how terrible the speed is but the customer care would not know until everyone starts complaining to them through the phone.

 

The most effective way is to call Sprint and say your concerns to them.

 

Thanks.

 

P.S. I mean nothing negative. I simply am stating truth on every post. Honestly, we cannot bath in obvious lies so either accept it or move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much everyone in the philly metro area has extremely slow speeds...heck more than not i cant download only upload and get network error on my screen. I have learned to deal with it i understand it takes time to fix issues and if doing without for a few months then thats what i have to do. Sprint i understand knows people are frustrated.....one things for sure unlimted 4g (when it goes live) is a much better deal than verizon, at&t, and tmobile throttle plans!!! I can hold off!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much everyone in the philly metro area has extremely slow speeds...heck more than not i cant download only upload and get network error on my screen. I have learned to deal with it i understand it takes time to fix issues and if doing without for a few months then thats what i have to do. Sprint i understand knows people are frustrated.....one things for sure unlimted 4g (when it goes live) is a much better deal than verizon, at&t, and tmobile throttle plans!!! I can hold off!!

 

So many people in Philly so the network cannot handle the usages. Sprint is actually adding more sites in Philly so it can handle the need of mobile data.

Edited by HappyHappy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many people in Philly so the network cannot handle the usages. Sprint is actually adding more sites in Philly so it can handle the need of mobile data.

 

I've always been curious if this is tied to the heavy adoption of the MVNOs (MetroPCS, Virgin, Boost, Cricket) in the area. They piggyback on Sprint's network so it seems like that's potentially where the unanticipated volume comes from. I'm actually hoping that with SoftBank's big investment in Sprint (assuming it's approved) they won't have to over-leverage their network to bolster cash-flow. And I'm really hoping they don't lease out their LTE network the way they did 3G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always been curious if this is tied to the heavy adoption of the MVNOs (MetroPCS, Virgin, Boost, Cricket) in the area. They piggyback on Sprint's network so it seems like that's potentially where the unanticipated volume comes from. I'm actually hoping that with SoftBank's big investment in Sprint (assuming it's approved) they won't have to over-leverage their network to bolster cash-flow. And I'm really hoping they don't lease out their LTE network the way they did 3G.

 

Boost and Virgin belongs to Sprint if I remember correctly. Virgin and Boost pretty much use Sprint's 3G network like all of us.

 

Sprint may have leased their network to MetroPCS and Cricket.

 

This definitely is one problem and could have caused extra volumes.

 

I also think that there are too few towers within a neighborhood, so tower cannot take extra traffics due to the fact that there is a huge population growth in Philly within the past few years (immigrants and others). I think there is usually 2-4 per neighborhood, with the exception in Center City and certain districts within the city (they get like 15 or more.

 

I think they are aware of this now and hopefully they get more towers within a neighborhood to better handle the extra network traffic.

Edited by HappyHappy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint may have leased their network to MetroPCS and Cricket.

 

No, both MetroPCS and Cricket operate their own CDMA2000/LTE hybrid networks in Philadelphia.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's easy to want to blame MVNO's. However, they do not constitute a huge burden to the network overall, and most do not offer unlimited.

 

Sprint wants to grow their brand and subscribership even further from here. Whether that is from organic postpaid growth, their prepaid brands or MVNO's, it doesn't much matter. Sprint needs to be prepared for additional traffic and be prepared for an aggressive and proactive capex budget and planning to handle it.

 

MVNO's are not going anywhere and will be a part of Sprint's future survival and successes. The network failures of the past were more about capex spend and the failure to have WiMax off load data traffic the way they planned. These are not related to MVNO's. It's just easy to blame the MVNO because they were the last thing to jump on the pile. The truth is that the legacy network was damned long before the popularity of MVNO takeoff.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked to Sprint and they told me the tower by the Giant at Flowers Mills in Langhorne, PA has been down since end of November and that they were working on it.

This would explain why my signal always drops out when I'm driving past there on Rt. 1. My phone has even started roaming a few times in that area. At least I know why now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree with Happyhappy. Philadelphia is one of the most challenged markets. I am in Wildwood. We never got Wimax, and our hopes of getting LTE any time soon is a toss up.

 

Having said that. I have used LTE in New York. The value of unlimited data with sprint makes it an easy choice for me. I think we have to look more at Softbank. They are the Japanese firm that is buying Sprint. They are a CDMA LTE carrier. They grabbed market share by doing an aggressive lte buildout, and the best pricing in the market.

 

Robert the moderator of S4gru also lives out in the sticks in New Mexico by the way, and he shares some of the same experiences that I have, in living in an under served area.

 

I know we heard this song before. But, I strongly believe if we give Sprint another nine months it will be well worth it. You guys might want to make a donaton to S4gru like I did. Robert has to do an amazing amount of data work on this site. The sponsor maps are great.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...