Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Atlanta/Athens Market


frank04

Recommended Posts

If you are in good range, you still have to toggle sometimes? Does changing PRL make things better for LTE?

 

A PRL update wouldn't even make a 3G or 1X Sprint PCS signal any better than it was. Now write a PRL without the proper MCC/MNC records in the geo you are in and the 4G indicator will magically go away ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed yesterday that around the Forest Park, Morrow, and Lake City area, there is more 4GLTE coverage. They must have just turned on some 4G towers in that area. I had 4G connection from my house in Lake City all the way to downtown ATL. Today I went from my house all the way to Mt. Zion shopping area (Best Buy, PetSmart, HomeDepot, etc.) with 4G all the way. I couldn't do that before. I never had 4G at my house before and when I went to Mt. Zion area, it was always in and out.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed yesterday that around the Forest Park, Morrow, and Lake City area, there is more 4GLTE coverage. They must have just turned on some 4G towers in that area. I had 4G connection from my house in Lake City all the way to downtown ATL. Today I went from my house all the way to Mt. Zion shopping area (Best Buy, PetSmart, HomeDepot, etc.) with 4G all the way. I couldn't do that before. I never had 4G at my house before and when I went to Mt. Zion area, it was always in and out.

 

They have made quite a few improvements in that area for sure, by the way what kind of phone do you have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been doing some testing of the LTE network while in Atlanta this weekend. I am pretty disappointed in the LTE coverage. Was north of town, just near downtown, and on I-85 near Duluth. Seems like as soon as I get the 4G icon, it only stays on for a bit. I can use it if I don't move too much. In buildings, only 3G is available. Not the performance I was expecting. I did get decent speeds when I was able to connect.

Screenshot_2012-09-29-10-13-29.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed yesterday that around the Forest Park, Morrow, and Lake City area, there is more 4GLTE coverage. They must have just turned on some 4G towers in that area. I had 4G connection from my house in Lake City all the way to downtown ATL. Today I went from my house all the way to Mt. Zion shopping area (Best Buy, PetSmart, HomeDepot, etc.) with 4G all the way. I couldn't do that before. I never had 4G at my house before and when I went to Mt. Zion area, it was always in and out.

 

Install Sensorly app. That is how I find out if there is LTE coverage there or not. I always turn it on when no LTE has been map there before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont understand why Houston, a big sprawling city with three rings around the city will finish the mapping on March 2013 and Atlanta with only one ring (I-285) will be completed in August 2013.

 

How does the amount of city bypasses have anything to do with LTE deployment? The amount of cell sites has to be enough to support the population of the market, sprawling or not.

 

The dates are forecasted by using the current rate of conversion applied to the remaining sites in the market.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does the amount of city bypasses have anything to do with LTE deployment? The amount of cell sites has to be enough to support the population of the market, sprawling or not.

 

The dates are forecasted by using the current rate of conversion applied to the remaining sites in the market.

 

I didnt see the sprawling vs capacity part. :lol:

 

With LTE, the more people get on it, the slower the speed or is it limit by how many LTE users per tower?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt see the sprawling vs capacity part. :lol:

 

With LTE, the more people get on it, the slower the speed or is it limit by how many LTE users per tower?

 

Users per tower as well as what the users are doing. If you have 100 people on a tower checking facebook, it will be a lot less load on the tower than 100 people streaming netflix in 720p resolution.

 

Each sector is broken into resource blocks. The more data intensive the usage is, the more resource blocks it hogs. Once the resource blocks are all being used, the cell has to start taking away resource blocks and allocating them to new users. Then everyone slows down. Once the NV rollout is complete, the network could also recognize that one cell is starting to become overloaded and push some users onto a neighboring cell with less load.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Install Sensorly app. That is how I find out if there is LTE coverage there or not. I always turn it on when no LTE has been map there before.

I do have sensorly app, there was no 4G mapped where I was talking about until I mapped it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do have sensorly app, there was no 4G mapped where I was talking about until I mapped it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Yes, that is how you know when there are new coverage. It looks like it take a day before you see the refresh on their server.

 

Did you all have 10 update on this app for the last 2 days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Users per tower as well as what the users are doing. If you have 100 people on a tower checking facebook, it will be a lot less load on the tower than 100 people streaming netflix in 720p resolution.

 

Each sector is broken into resource blocks. The more data intensive the usage is, the more resource blocks it hogs. Once the resource blocks are all being used, the cell has to start taking away resource blocks and allocating them to new users. Then everyone slows down. Once the NV rollout is complete, the network could also recognize that one cell is starting to become overloaded and push some users onto a neighboring cell with less load.

 

I see. So its like cable modem technology. The more user the less the speed.

 

Another cell tower with less load may not have the fastest speed as it is further away.

 

I wonder if they would throttle someone that has been downloading for the last hour on that tower.

 

I am sure there is away to hack the phone to select the tower you want, the PRL you want. That is why I like root.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see. So its like cable modem technology. The more user the less the speed.

Exactly

Another cell tower with less load may not have the fastest speed as it is further away.

It might not, but it is better to have one person with lower speeds than everyone on the cell

I wonder if they would throttle someone that has been downloading for the last hour on that tower.

They might institute something like that

I am sure there is away to hack the phone to select the tower you want, the PRL you want. That is why I like root.

I haven't seen anything like that, and PRL has almost nothing to do with LTE connectivity. It seems to be more of a enable/disable thing, possibly with battery life in mind.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been doing some testing of the LTE network while in Atlanta this weekend. I am pretty disappointed in the LTE coverage. Was north of town, just near downtown, and on I-85 near Duluth. Seems like as soon as I get the 4G icon, it only stays on for a bit. I can use it if I don't move too much. In buildings, only 3G is available. Not the performance I was expecting. I did get decent speeds when I was able to connect.

 

Join the club. Just have to wait until more sites are upgraded and kinks worked out.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont understand why Houston, a big sprawling city with three rings around the city will finish the mapping on March 2013 and Atlanta with only one ring (I-285) will be completed in August 2013.

 

RF engineering in Atlanta is far more complex than in Houston... Houston doesn't really have any hills to speak of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My perception is the Atlanta LTE coverage seems to grow daily...I am starting to pick up signals in many more places on the way to work than I did just a few weeks ago. Have there been any updates on completed towers in the market lately?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see. So its like cable modem technology. The more user the less the speed.

 

Another cell tower with less load may not have the fastest speed as it is further away.

 

I wonder if they would throttle someone that has been downloading for the last hour on that tower.

 

I am sure there is away to hack the phone to select the tower you want, the PRL you want. That is why I like root.

 

Not really like cable modem. It's just shared bandwidth like any internet connection out there. DSL is shared, fiber is shared, etc.

 

You can't pick a tower with a PRL, a PRL isn't a list of towers, it's a list of cell systems. And actually with LTE Sprint can only disable or enable LTE in the PRL for specific GEO. A GEO encompasses many cell systems which could be thousands and thousands of towers.

 

Root has nothing to do with PRLs or writing other PRLs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My perception is the Atlanta LTE coverage seems to grow daily...I am starting to pick up signals in many more places on the way to work than I did just a few weeks ago. Have there been any updates on completed towers in the market lately?

 

Yes. There is a thread in the Sponsor section with interactive maps that show all the completed towers. It gets updated once a week. Should be updated later today with all the new sites in every market. Including the new ones in Atlanta.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is new expanded LTE coverage where I live.

 

I was running at the Jester Creek Pathway and I got LTE coverage right behind the Lee Elementery school and toward Tara Blvd and I map it tonight.

 

Now I can Skype my friends and family when I am at the pathway, its more like a trail. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't wait until the coverage is common in Atlanta, wall to wall in the way that 3G is today. I know I've read it a million times, but it bears repeating: because the initial LTE rollout is in the 1900mhz band, 4G LTE should be just as ubiquitous (sp??) as Sprint's current 3G coverage. Which, all in all is pretty decent despite what some people say. So I'm pleased....it's just that I don't understand why it's taking so very long (launched in mid-July as we all know) to complete in this market?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't wait until the coverage is common in Atlanta, wall to wall in the way that 3G is today. I know I've read it a million times, but it bears repeating: because the initial LTE rollout is in the 1900mhz band, 4G LTE should be just as ubiquitous (sp??) as Sprint's current 3G coverage. Which, all in all is pretty decent despite what some people say. So I'm pleased....it's just that I don't understand why it's taking so very long (launched in mid-July as we all know) to complete in this market?

 

To be honest, other than in a few buildings where 4g doesn't penetrate I get LTE everywhere I go with no exceptions in the metro area.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, other than in a few buildings where 4g doesn't penetrate I get LTE everywhere I go with no exceptions in the metro area.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Really? Awesome news indeed! The only reason I have yet to upgrade to the GS3 is because I was waiting for LTE to cover more of the area. I live, work and play in the city proper and don't really get out to the burbs very often. I know the coverage is better out there for a multitude of reasons, not the least of which is because the rollout actually started out there first and then worked its way inward. But I have two friends with the GS3 who also live primarily in Midtown and they say the service is spotty still. So maybe that's the difference but I'm glad to hear that it's getting better with each passing day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can get everyone to download and actually use the Sensorly app, a great coverage map will begin emerge and we all will know how it looks.

I have the app and use it when I drive areas that I have not already mapped.

I will say that it is amazing how little I drive outside my normal daily routines.

 

Mav.

 

Sent on my Galaxy Nexus using the Continuum Transfunctioner.

Edited by VW Maverick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Quote from wsj; "The T-Mobile deal could be reached as soon as later this month, while discussions with Verizon on a separate transaction are expected to take longer or might not result in an agreement, the people said." "The rising value of wireless licenses is a driving force behind the deal. U.S. Cellular’s spectrum portfolio touches 30 states and covers about 51 million people, according to regulatory filings." https://specmap.sequence-omega.net/
    • From WSJ which is paywalled but they're reporting that T-Mobile and Verizon are working on a joint deal to buy and split up U.S. Cellular. https://www.wsj.com/business/telecom/t-mobile-verizon-in-talks-to-carve-up-u-s-cellular-46d1e5e6?st=qwngrnh4s3bcr76 — — — — —  Summary from a user in the Reddit thread:  
    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...