Jump to content

Is a tower that connects eHRPD already upgraded?


Recommended Posts

To quote Robert from another topic,

Sprint installs eHRPD as a software upgrade over the EVDO network in an area before LTE is deployed. It must be complete on each LTE site and every site surrounding a live LTE site, to allow for the proper handoff between EVDO and LTE.

 

So Sprint typically is upgrading all the sites to eHRPD well in advance of LTE deployment. Every market that has active NV deployment already has eHRPD largely deployed. And some even that will not get LTE until 2013 are already reporting some eHRPD, most likely caused by which LTE core they are connected to coming live.

 

eHRPD is EVDO that runs through the LTE core, so it can maintain one IP address as it handsoff between LTE and 3G. It is possible that eHRPD will be faster at times, if the LTE core is less busy than the EVDO data switch. But when using the same backhaul, EVDO and eHRPD should be similar speeds.

 

So connecting to eHRPD doesn't necessarily mean anything about the tower to which you are connecting.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting then that the Boston area is getting LTE towers going live, but I still haven't seen any eHRPD connections anywhere in Massachusetts. Only time i've gotten an eHRPD signal is in the Baltimore airport.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting then that the Boston area is getting LTE towers going live' date=' but I still haven't seen any eHRPD connections anywhere in Massachusetts. Only time i've gotten an eHRPD signal is in the Baltimore airport.[/quote']

 

But now that Sprint is actively blocking LTE connections, eHRPD availability is less important. It will need to be up on every site and every site adjacent to any unblocked LTE site in order for the handoffs to occur as designed.

 

In cases where Sprint does not have eHRPD ready to be used around completed LTE sites, I expect them to continue blocking access to that LTE site...even on launched markets.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live on the CT/MA border does that mean they should set my tower(CT) up for eHRPD so i can switch to LTE when you go into MA.

 

That's a good question. You would think so. I'm not sure how they will handle market boundaries. My guess is if the CT site is on the same exact 4G core as the site across the border in MA, then I believe they will.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how far in advanced do they do eHRPD and what is it software/hardware. like ahecht said it's not in the Boston market yet i keep checking.

 

There is no definite timelines in advance that eHRPD gets operational in advance of LTE. I just don't think they will allow LTE sites to go live without eHRPD live around it. Especially since LTE will start out as islands. They want customers to be able to Anne off seamlessly between 3G and LTE.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have visited a couple of the MA LTE sites and have not found either LTE or ehrpd.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

What are you using to try to connect to LTE or eHRPD? The E4GT is not capable of either connection...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you using to detect eHRPD vs CDMA? Thanks.

 

The Netmonitor app on Android works pretty well; you can also look under Settings -> About phone -> Network (at least on the Evo 4G LTE, although I think that's the standard place on all ICS phones).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My EVO LTE :P

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

He assumed you still have a E4GT, because that is what is listed in your profile. You should update your device when you get a chance.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He assumed you still have a E4GT, because that is what is listed in your profile. You should update your device when you get a chance.

 

Robert

 

I Finally just now changed mine :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
The app is called "network signal info" by kaibits software.

 

Yeah, another of the class of apps that I don't like for privacy reasons, even the so-called "Pro" version. I realize that some people don't share my opinion, but I won't install such an app and widget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, another of the class of apps that I don't like for privacy reasons, even the so-called "Pro" version. I realize that some people don't share my opinion, but I won't install such an app and widget.

May I ask what's wrong with the app?

 

Sent From EVO LTE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, another of the class of apps that I don't like for privacy reasons, even the so-called "Pro" version. I realize that some people don't share my opinion, but I won't install such an app and widget.

 

Yep..nice looking app but horrible permissions.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I ask what's wrong with the app?

 

Installing the app grants it permissions that could enable reading your phone number and those you connect to, as well as your location, and report them somewhere via an Internet connection over which you have no control. And if the widget is installed, then it runs full time as a service. I choose not to do that, although it is increasingly common as a business model to barter one's private details in exchange for the use of a "free" app. But even the paid "Pro" version has all those permissions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
    • Welcome back! That's similar to my best (1250ish). A few people have broken 2000 on good sites. 
    • Lots of new multi-carrier nodes popping up in Bushwick. Crown Castle Fiber node at Ridgewood & Palmetto:   Crown Castle Solutions node at Irving & Jefferson:   Crown Castle Solutions node at Wilson & Noll:  
    • I’m surprised they’re running a 5x5 Band 66 carrier still. In NYC T-Mobile has 25x25 AWS and they’re running 20x20 Band 66 and 5x5 n66 (in testing). Presumably when n66 commercially launches they’ll drop Band 66 down to 15x15 and go straight for a 10x10 n66 carrier like they did with n25. 
    • Austin has now narrowed B2 to 15x15 to support a second 10x10 n25 channel, this time entirely in PCS A-F. So T-Mobile now has 35x35 FD (n71 + n25) and 180 MHz TD (n41) NR live here, and LTE single carrier bandwidth now tops out at 15x15. LTE is down to 5x5 B12, 15x15 B2, 10x10+10x10+5x5 B66, so they now have 5 carriers each of LTE and NR, with 45x45 total LTE.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...