Jump to content

Is a tower that connects eHRPD already upgraded?


Recommended Posts

To quote Robert from another topic,

Sprint installs eHRPD as a software upgrade over the EVDO network in an area before LTE is deployed. It must be complete on each LTE site and every site surrounding a live LTE site, to allow for the proper handoff between EVDO and LTE.

 

So Sprint typically is upgrading all the sites to eHRPD well in advance of LTE deployment. Every market that has active NV deployment already has eHRPD largely deployed. And some even that will not get LTE until 2013 are already reporting some eHRPD, most likely caused by which LTE core they are connected to coming live.

 

eHRPD is EVDO that runs through the LTE core, so it can maintain one IP address as it handsoff between LTE and 3G. It is possible that eHRPD will be faster at times, if the LTE core is less busy than the EVDO data switch. But when using the same backhaul, EVDO and eHRPD should be similar speeds.

 

So connecting to eHRPD doesn't necessarily mean anything about the tower to which you are connecting.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting then that the Boston area is getting LTE towers going live, but I still haven't seen any eHRPD connections anywhere in Massachusetts. Only time i've gotten an eHRPD signal is in the Baltimore airport.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting then that the Boston area is getting LTE towers going live' date=' but I still haven't seen any eHRPD connections anywhere in Massachusetts. Only time i've gotten an eHRPD signal is in the Baltimore airport.[/quote']

 

But now that Sprint is actively blocking LTE connections, eHRPD availability is less important. It will need to be up on every site and every site adjacent to any unblocked LTE site in order for the handoffs to occur as designed.

 

In cases where Sprint does not have eHRPD ready to be used around completed LTE sites, I expect them to continue blocking access to that LTE site...even on launched markets.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live on the CT/MA border does that mean they should set my tower(CT) up for eHRPD so i can switch to LTE when you go into MA.

 

That's a good question. You would think so. I'm not sure how they will handle market boundaries. My guess is if the CT site is on the same exact 4G core as the site across the border in MA, then I believe they will.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how far in advanced do they do eHRPD and what is it software/hardware. like ahecht said it's not in the Boston market yet i keep checking.

 

There is no definite timelines in advance that eHRPD gets operational in advance of LTE. I just don't think they will allow LTE sites to go live without eHRPD live around it. Especially since LTE will start out as islands. They want customers to be able to Anne off seamlessly between 3G and LTE.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have visited a couple of the MA LTE sites and have not found either LTE or ehrpd.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

What are you using to try to connect to LTE or eHRPD? The E4GT is not capable of either connection...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you using to detect eHRPD vs CDMA? Thanks.

 

The Netmonitor app on Android works pretty well; you can also look under Settings -> About phone -> Network (at least on the Evo 4G LTE, although I think that's the standard place on all ICS phones).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My EVO LTE :P

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

He assumed you still have a E4GT, because that is what is listed in your profile. You should update your device when you get a chance.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He assumed you still have a E4GT, because that is what is listed in your profile. You should update your device when you get a chance.

 

Robert

 

I Finally just now changed mine :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
The app is called "network signal info" by kaibits software.

 

Yeah, another of the class of apps that I don't like for privacy reasons, even the so-called "Pro" version. I realize that some people don't share my opinion, but I won't install such an app and widget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, another of the class of apps that I don't like for privacy reasons, even the so-called "Pro" version. I realize that some people don't share my opinion, but I won't install such an app and widget.

May I ask what's wrong with the app?

 

Sent From EVO LTE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, another of the class of apps that I don't like for privacy reasons, even the so-called "Pro" version. I realize that some people don't share my opinion, but I won't install such an app and widget.

 

Yep..nice looking app but horrible permissions.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I ask what's wrong with the app?

 

Installing the app grants it permissions that could enable reading your phone number and those you connect to, as well as your location, and report them somewhere via an Internet connection over which you have no control. And if the widget is installed, then it runs full time as a service. I choose not to do that, although it is increasingly common as a business model to barter one's private details in exchange for the use of a "free" app. But even the paid "Pro" version has all those permissions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • As far as I know it's ubiquitous. Ultimately the network decides if you should use VoNR vs VoLTE but pretty much anytime my phone is in standalone mode and I place a call, it goes over NR.   Yup, it was terrible. After a while, I just connected to the WiFi, and that worked fine at about 90Mbps. I get the feeling that rather than doing a "real" upgrade where they install new antennas, upgrade backhaul, etc., T-Mobile instead installed new radios onto the existing and already overloaded DAS and called it a day, which isn't enough. Compared to Yankee Stadium, where they actually went and deployed new antennas/radios for their n41 upgrade, and you're able to get upwards of 200Mbps at sold-out games, Arthur Ashe really is a joke. What's worse is that the folks in their NOC likely know this already, but no effort is being made to change that. I'm not asking for T-Mobile to deploy mmWave everywhere like Verizon but there is a real use case for it at stadiums.
    • Does anyone know how well implemented is VoNR in the 5 boroughs. Does anyone use it? I have an iPhone 15 Pro. Does anyone know if T-Mobile is still working on upgrading their network? It seems like the service has gone down. My phone struggles in parts of the Belt Pkwy, and data is slow. 
    • I come to the US Open men’s semifinals and finals every year, and I’ve never been able to use my T-Mobile phone successfully. Usually AT&T is the top performer—good to hear Verizon has upped their game. 
    • One sector down, two more to go — — — — —  I was at Arthur Ashe Stadium for the U.S. Open today and the good news is that there is an n25/41 DAS setup throughout USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center. From the "boardwalk" to the outdoor concession area, to inside the stadium; you connect to standalone n41 and n25 everywhere via oDAS and iDAS. The bad news is that in the actual stadium it's beyond useless. While I saw strong coverage as indicated by signal bars and I was able to make calls and send texts, there was no data throughput at all. Running a speed test failed 9 out of 10 times. The only time I got a speed test to work was by switching to LTE funnily enough or by using NSA 5G where the test would initiate via LTE and then n41 would kick in giving me ~20Mbps. T-Mobile has so much traffic on their 5G network that now n41 gets bogged down before LTE. That was a first for me! In the stadium in the same area Verizon got 1.2Gbps on mmWave and LTE kept timing out when trying to test it. My Boost line on AT&T got upwards of 150Mbps on C-band and I know they have mmWave deployed as I saw their Nokia mmWave antennas deployed but I was unable to test it. In the outdoor concession area T-Mobile performed well getting over 150Mbps on n41. AT&T in these areas saw over 250Mbps on C-band and I didn't get the opportunity to test Verizon there. It just seems like 140MHz n41 is not enough capacity for the amount of people inside the stadium. Hopefully T-Mobile is considering deploying n258 to all of these stadiums since they now own that mmWave nationwide. It'd make a world of difference in terms of capacity at these venues. Bonus Pics: Verizon and AT&T mmWave Hidden carrier neutral DAS: 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...