Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Lower Central Valley Market (Fresno, Bakersfield, Visalia)


aelenes

Recommended Posts

got these Speeds today in Bakersfield today only until 5 was fun until it went out

 

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152496075850166&set=o.156282624523388&type=1&theater

 

Wait! What? Where in Bakersfield was this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait! What? Where in Bakersfield was this?

Live off of Stockdale Hwy & No Stine Rd would like to see this again tomorrow or the next day hopefully not just tease me all day The New Sprint Store on Gosford Rd keeps getting 4G & messes with all of there activations so would be nice

Edited by Nextel49
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just checked my Signal Check Pro and looks like the Acequia tower is no longer broadcasting in eHRPD and is now back to EV-DO, also no matter how many times I do a PRL update I'm still stuck on 1xRTT on my note 2, not a huge deal but just throwing it out there

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was picking up one of my managers at the GMC dealership on Ben Maddox, and for a split second I got 4G LTE from the Acequia tower, I was not able to get a screen capture but i'll keep my phone on mobile data instead of WiFi. I hope that it's about to go live would be nice to have LTE at work and hopefully home

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is a voice and data ticket open in the sprint zone app its been open past couple days maybe thats why were picking up 4g off Acequia. last i picked up 4g  out of no where here in Exeter inside my home I connected a few times but for like a minute. 

the data and voice ticket is effecting  W Tulare Ave 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're referring to the country... :(

 

It went out to pretty much everyone, regardless of network status.

Except for me.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're referring to the country... :(

 

It went out to pretty much everyone, regardless of network status.

 

Well, regardless, Clovis is getting pretty close to at least a 3G launch. If any users in the city of Fresno (which seamlessly transitions into Clovis, btw) got the text, then yeah it is definitely a load of BS because they're not getting squat anytime soon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, regardless, Clovis is getting pretty close to at least a 3G launch. If any users in the city of Fresno (which seamlessly transitions into Clovis, btw) got the text, then yeah it is definitely a load of BS because they're not getting squat anytime soon.

 

Robert got the text. In South Dakota. Where there is no Sprint Network. And he has his billing address listed there too. So, don't read into it. Just something to keep people hopefully, even if falsely. Hopefully the lower central valley market can see a little more movement soon.

 

I think I saw some LTE signals in Bakersfield? Was that real?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert got the text. In South Dakota. Where there is no Sprint Network. And he has his billing address listed there too. So, don't read into it. Just something to keep people hopefully, even if falsely. Hopefully the lower central valley market can see a little more movement soon.

 

I think I saw some LTE signals in Bakersfield? Was that real?

yup I posted that I got LTE I wished that it stayed on longer speeds were pretty good just not LA Fast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yup I posted that I got LTE I wished that it stayed on longer speeds were pretty good just not LA Fast

Did you map it on Sensorly? I didn't see it pop up. :(

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint just released 40 new cities as having LTE....funny that none of the central valley cities are on it

They only announce a city when it has substantial coverage. None of the lower central valley cities make the cut yet. The announcement does nothing to change the amount if coverage.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They only announce a city when it has substantial coverage. None of the lower central valley cities make the cut yet. The announcement does nothing to change the amount if coverage.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Surprising, actually. Visalia only has 4 sites and 2 are LTE enabled. It must be because of the eCSFB issue that is keeping them cautious on launching the Visalia/Tulare area. And frankly, I can't blame them.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...