Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

Band41 is the savior for that which is Sprint's LTE, Spark, and Network Vision.  They should be pounding this fact at every opportunity possible.

 

And, in my opinion, there are probably opportunities to expedite Band 41 deployment even faster.  It's my biggest criticism of Sprint.  I think they could have Band 41 complete on WiMax sites in approximately 6 months, and on every Network Vision LTE site that doesn't require permits within six months.  

 

If Tmo can do an LTE overlay in 9 months, Sprint needs to do the same with Band 41.  Excuses with this are nothing more than excuses.  And Band 26 should be able to deployed on every active Band 25 site (outside the IBEZ in the 3-4 months).  Anything longer is just a failure to prioritize and manage.

Robert

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, in my opinion, there are probably opportunities to expedite Band 41 deployment even faster.  It's my biggest criticism of Sprint.  I think they could have Band 41 complete on WiMax sites in approximately 6 months, and on every Network Vision LTE site that doesn't require permits within six months.  

 

If Tmo can do an LTE overlay in 9 months, Sprint needs to do the same with Band 41.  Excuses with this are nothing more than excuses.  And Band 26 should be able to deployed on every active Band 25 site (outside the IBEZ in the 3-4 months).  Anything longer is just a failure to prioritize and manage.

Robert

Care to attend the next shareholders conference?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, in my opinion, there are probably opportunities to expedite Band 41 deployment even faster.  It's my biggest criticism of Sprint.  I think they could have Band 41 complete on WiMax sites in approximately 6 months, and on every Network Vision LTE site that doesn't require permits within six months.  

 

If Tmo can do an LTE overlay in 9 months, Sprint needs to do the same with Band 41.  Excuses with this are nothing more than excuses.  And Band 26 should be able to deployed on every active Band 25 site (outside the IBEZ in the 3-4 months).  Anything longer is just a failure to prioritize and manage.

Robert

 

That was similar to the criticism I read on Fierce Wireless. Sprint is building the Winchester Mystery Mansion of cellular networks.

Edited by drock2750
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was similar to the criticism I read on Fierce Wireless. Sprint is building the Winchester Mystery Mansion of cellular networks.

 

It's nothing compared to the band hodgepodge that AT&T is forced to do.  At least when Spark is complete, 80%+ of all Sprint LTE traffic will likely be on one band.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any news regarding 800 LTE for the Chicago market yet?

 

I was in theater district last night and was only pulling 6-10mbps on Band 41 even with -85 to -95db RSRP on my one max

Edited by bitslizer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any news regarding 800 LTE for the Chicago market yet?

 

I was in theater district last night and was only pulling 6-10mbps on Band 41 even with -85 to -95db RSRP on my one max

Glad to hear you picked up B41 in the Loop.  Question though did you get that 6-10Mbps while inside the theater, I am curious about the indoor coverage on B41.  And I would consider 6-10Mbps a very good speed for downtown, that represents a 30x to 50x increase over LTE speeds on B25 these days down there, which are around 200K off peak hours (after 7PM in Loop).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to hear you picked up B41 in the Loop.  Question though did you get that 6-10Mbps while inside the theater, I am curious about the indoor coverage on B41.  And I would consider 6-10Mbps a very good speed for downtown, that represents a 30x to 50x increase over LTE speeds on B25 these days down there, which are around 200K off peak hours (after 7PM in Loop).

 

I should have been more clear.

 

I was getting 6-10mbps on B41 last evening about 7pm while I was sitting inside a restaurant call Siam Rice on Wells, windows seat to get the -85 to -95 db RSRP

 

I was still on B41 while inside the Cadillac palace theater, balcony near the top, but I did not do a speed test there, and I think the signal was fairly weak.

 

 

However, I was also near the same area back in Dec (lunch time) and I was able to get 20mbps with even weaker signal strength

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should have been more clear.

 

I was getting 6-10mbps on B41 last evening about 7pm while I was sitting inside a restaurant call Siam Rice on Wells, windows seat to get the -85 to -95 db RSRP

 

I was still on B41 while inside the Cadillac palace theater, balcony near the top, but I did not do a speed test there, and I think the signal was fairly weak.

 

 

However, I was also near the same area back in Dec (lunch time) and I was able to get 20mbps with even weaker signal strength

Oh yeah Siam Rice, I know that spot, its right on Wells under the El tracks.  I do a lot of speed testing over there because I use the Washington/Wells El Stop everyday and always have a few min to kill waiting for my train.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Band 26 should be able to deployed on every active Band 25 site (outside the IBEZ in the 3-4 months).  Anything longer is just a failure to prioritize and manage.

Robert

 

Once both band 26 and 41 are active, the performance of the actual hand off between these bands could be what makes or breaks the user experience as they go from high signal to low signal areas on band 41 and suddenly the user is on an air link constrained band 26 if hand off logic isn't carefully optimized. Band 41 needs to be the default with band 26 being the "emergency" back up air link, with band 25 being a 2nd back up (though not optimal) when 26 is at air link capacity. Not sure how the switching logic is implemented now on Sprint devices and whether it is seamless to someone using VOIP or streaming.   Poor hand off logic could come back to haunt Sprint if this isn't done right, regardless of spectrum availability.

 

I don't have a Spark device, but if anyone would know what would be the typical % of the users in an urban environment that would be in an area of poor band 41 coverage, after full deployment? If it's 10% or less the back up LTE bands may be fine, any greater and there may be some concerns.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once both band 26 and 41 are active, the performance of the actual hand off between these bands could be what makes or breaks the user experience as they go from high signal to low signal areas on band 41 and suddenly the user is on an air link constrained band 26 if hand off logic isn't carefully optimized. Band 41 needs to be the default with band 26 being the "emergency" back up air link, with band 25 being a 2nd back up (though not optimal) when 26 is at air link capacity. Not sure how the switching logic is implemented now on Sprint devices and whether it is seamless to someone using VOIP or streaming.   Poor hand off logic could come back to haunt Sprint if this isn't done right, regardless of spectrum availability.

 

I don't have a Spark device, but if anyone would know what would be the typical % of the users in an urban environment that would be in an area of poor band 41 coverage, after full deployment? If it's 10% or less the back up LTE bands mThat ay be fine, any greater and there may be some concerns.

Become a premier sponsor and that can be determined by eyeballing the coverage maps and tower pins for the B41 and B26 sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone with a Spark phone care to share their handoff experience between band 41 and band 25 say when streaming. Seamless or not?

 

Half the time I don't notice. I have noticed at times the LTE symbol will disappear for about 10 seconds during a handoff, whether it be from 25 to 41 or 41 to 25. I may have a disrupted internet connection for a few seconds but I haven't had a song change or tried browsing when this happens because I am usually driving. 

 

And I'm on a Nexus 5 WITHOUT a Spark update, so I'm sure whenever we do get the update it will only improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let us know if service improves in the immediate area. Any help with service downtown is appreciated.

 

 

Vince

I was in River North last nite and connected to the new LTE tower in question.  I was at Grand and State, probably 800 feet or so away from the tower.  It was 8PM on a sleepy Wed night, but I received the best speeds and best LTE signal strength I have seen in 6 months.  I tested both indoors and outdoors at this location, got 9Mbps down indoors and 12Mbps down outdoors.  I will have to check again during more crowded times for this area like Friday or Sat nights and see what the results are then.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had an incredible amount of dropped calls this week. Mostly on the south side, a few in Harvey. Anyone else experiencing this? I've always praised Sprint for their voice quality and coverage in this area, and can't even remember my last dropped call. Probably during NV upgrades.

 

 

Vince

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had an incredible amount of dropped calls this week. Mostly on the south side, a few in Harvey. Anyone else experiencing this? I've always praised Sprint for their voice quality and coverage in this area, and can't even remember my last dropped call. Probably during NV upgrades. Vince

That is really strange. Do you have another phone you can try? Like you I can't remember the last time I had a dropped call...

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had an incredible amount of dropped calls this week. Mostly on the south side, a few in Harvey. Anyone else experiencing this? I've always praised Sprint for their voice quality and coverage in this area, and can't even remember my last dropped call. Probably during NV upgrades. Vince

Happens every once in awhile for me.  Occasionally, I am in the south suburbs I will check it out next time I'm down there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any news regarding 800 LTE for the Chicago market yet?

 

I was in theater district last night and was only pulling 6-10mbps on Band 41 even with -85 to -95db RSRP on my one max

 

Not all Band 41 sites have Spark upgraded backhaul yet.  If the site you were connected to was on just the original WiMax backhaul, it may only do 6-10Mbps even with hardly anyone on the same LTE carrier/sector.  Also, without LTE Engineering screens, we don't know if you had a good quality signal.  You may have had a lot of interference.

 

Additionally, we assume you verified that you were on Band 41 because you looked at your LTE Engineering screen and not merely because you saw the Spark logo.  The Spark logo shows no matter which band you're on.  The only way conclusively to know which band you're on is in the Engineering screen, of course.

 

No matter what it was in your circumstances, 6-10Mbps sounds like a triumph for a busy area at a peak time.  Sprint would have been a complete disaster there in the past.  And 6-10Mbps is the average that most of the other providers run too.  Triumph, I say!   :tu:

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not all Band 41 sites have Spark upgraded backhaul yet.  If the site you were connected to was on just the original WiMax backhaul, it may only do 6-10Mbps even with hardly anyone on the same LTE carrier/sector.  Also, without LTE Engineering screens, we don't know if you had a good quality signal.  You may have had a lot of interference.

 

Additionally, we assume you verified that you were on Band 41 because you looked at your LTE Engineering screen and not merely because you saw the Spark logo.  The Spark logo shows no matter which band you're on.  The only way conclusively to know which band you're on is in the Engineering screen, of course.

 

No matter what it was in your circumstances, 6-10Mbps sounds like a triumph for a busy area at a peak time.  Sprint would have been a complete disaster there in the past.  And 6-10Mbps is the average that most of the other providers run too.  Triumph, I say!   :tu:

 

Robert

 

I was able to pull 20+mbps with similar signal strength back in early December during lunch time , at very nearly the same location (1 block north, 1 block west), I didn't remember the base station ID but since its like 0.1 or 0.2 miles away only I think I'm most likely on the sam ebase station.  I would think Lunch time in Chicago loop is more "peak" then dinner time.

 

Yes I confirmed i was on B41 by looking at the LTE engineering screen ##33284#

 

I was wondering if the additional Spark devices brought by Sprint customer since December have already started degrading B41...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I was wondering if the additional Spark devices brought by Sprint customer since December have already started degrading B41...?

Not likely. A single site (or it's sector) could have maybe been bogged down by users at the exact time you were there, but as a market, it will take some time (if ever) for it to bog down. It's a larger slice of spectrum, and can accommodate more traffic. Like Robert mentioned; the site probably didn't have it a backhaul upgraded. Even 20mbps back in December would be slow on an unloaded sector. Spark is really fast, and should be in the 25-35 range, and peak in the mid-to-upper 50's. Then again, it all depends on signal, distance, users, etc..

 

 

Vince

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw. 20 mbps is a unloaded old clearwire wimax backhaul sector. Loaded it's more in the 6-12 mbps range during the day and during down hours it usually hovers around 12-15 mbps under limited load. 20 mbps is practically no one on it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was able to pull 20+mbps with similar signal strength back in early December during lunch time , at very nearly the same location (1 block north, 1 block west), I didn't remember the base station ID but since its like 0.1 or 0.2 miles away only I think I'm most likely on the sam ebase station.  I would think Lunch time in Chicago loop is more "peak" then dinner time.

 

Yes I confirmed i was on B41 by looking at the LTE engineering screen ##33284#

 

I was wondering if the additional Spark devices brought by Sprint customer since December have already started degrading B41...?

 

I would say that B41 degradation is nearly impossible at this time.  It is a 20MHz channel.  It has multiples amount of capacity over even a 5MHz channel.  And there are still very few Triband devices out there.  I would be shocked if Triband adoption rate was even above 5% yet.

 

Also, two things come to mind with the additional information you have provided.  Number one, it is possible that you were on different Band 41 sites/sectors from the 20Mbps speed test you had previously and the one now.  Number two, if you only were getting 20Mbps earlier when B41 had almost no one on it at all and getting something less than 50-60Mbps, then I feel like I can almost conclusively say you were not on a site with upgraded Spark backhaul (then or now).

 

If you were indeed at an off peak time for LTE, then why would it be even slower now?  I'll tell you why.  Because WiMax peak time is the evening when the Home ISP customers start surfing their porn and other video streaming.  If you were using WiMax backhaul, you would much more likely to feel it at night.  Double entendre intended.

 

I feel pretty comfortable ruling out a Band 41 capacity instance in your circumstance, and figuring the issue in this instance is old WiMax backhaul.  When it gets upgraded, the Band 41 LTE speeds will go way up.

 

And Band 41 capacity should never be a concern.  Because capacity continues to grow exponentially with each additional site that goes live.  And Sprint can add between 3 and 8 additional Band 41 carriers in each market to every single site.  Way more than any other provider.  So fear not.

 

Robert

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...