Jump to content

Atlanta, GA LTE (Live)


danielholt

Recommended Posts

Can't click on edit for some reason :/

 

Maybe this is what they was referrin to for June relating to the S3? Although kind of confusing... one part makes it like they referring to June for pre-order for GSM version of it in US then another part talks like they referring to the international version....

http://www.mobilenap...n-available.htm

Edited by Darkzeru
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting just below 1mbps up on 3G now so it's highly unlikely that wimax would be capped at 1 and 1.5.

 

Here in Hawaii on Wimax I average about 7-12 MB Down and max of 1.5 MB UP.

On 3G I get a Ave of about 1.5- 2.4 MB Down and 400KB-900KB UP

 

I never heard of anyone gettting Anywhere near 5MB UP on Wimax.

And as Muffinman said I think it was just last summer that Sprint upped the cap on Upload speed to 1.5MB

 

http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-reportedly-boosting-4g-upload-speed-cap-15mbps

Edited by HawaiiD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Here in Hawaii on Wimax I average about 7-12 MB Down and max of 1.5 MB UP.

On 3G I get a Ave of about 1.5- 2.4 MB Down and 400KB-900KB UP

 

I never heard of anyone gettting Anywhere near 5MB UP on Wimax.

And as Muffinman said I think it was just last summer that Sprint upped the cap on Upload speed to 1.5MB

 

http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-reportedly-boosting-4g-upload-speed-cap-15mbps

 

Fly ball into left field...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why can't I edit my own posts???

 

Nothing here we don't already know but nice to see the ATL getting LTE.

Nice to be in the top 2.

 

Mav. :cool:

 

Different membership levels have different permissions. They are detailed here http://s4gru.com/index.php?/page/index.html/_/announcements/first-s4gru-premier-sponsor-r32

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found a live LTE signal in Braselton. This was at 211 and Thompson Mill. I ran a few speed test. I was surprised to find it this far north. LTE is going to cover much better than Wimax ever did.6c4c71b8-12a7-cfb8.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between the site that themuffinman mentioned as active in the other thread and this site, could Sprint finally have stopped blocking LTE? Or maybe it's just not as widespread as it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in Jackson County when I did the speed test. I live south of this area, looking at the maps I thought that I would be on the fringe of LTE, I think that I will be in the middle of it now. This makes me very hopeful that Sprint is doing the right thing with LTE. When they are finished everyone with 3g should have LTE. I just cannot wait until they flip the switch.:rolleyes:

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found a live LTE signal in Braselton. This was at 211 and Thompson Mill. I ran a few speed test. I was surprised to find it this far north. LTE is going to cover much better than Wimax ever did.6c4c71b8-12a7-cfb8.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Is planetearth back under an assumed name? That would certainly appear to be a wi-fi speed test.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first screen shot covered I had the volume down cover it. The one I posted caught it saving. I am now posting the first speed test showing 4g is on. The speed is not as impressive.6c4c71b8-28cc-5f64.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first screen shot covered I had the volume down cover it. The one I posted caught it saving. I am now posting the first speed test showing 4g is on. The speed is not as impressive.6c4c71b8-28cc-5f64.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Hmm, the reason I questioned the validity is because the download speed is above the theoretical max and the upload speed is low, like you would expect to see from a wifi connection.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first screen shot covered I had the volume down cover it. The one I posted caught it saving. I am now posting the first speed test showing 4g is on. The speed is not as impressive.6c4c71b8-28cc-5f64.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Low? I will take that every day of the week...thank you very much! :)

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first screen shot covered I had the volume down cover it. The one I posted caught it saving. I am now posting the first speed test showing 4g is on. The speed is not as impressive.6c4c71b8-28cc-5f64.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

You could go into the "results" tab and click on that test. It will give you a result like this. 4053d97b-2bb6-62cc.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem, I was so excited that I finally got a 4g signal that I could not capture the screen shot correctly. Here is the results from that test showing LTE. 6c4c71b8-2b52-a27d.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem, I was so excited that I finally got a 4g signal that I could not capture the screen shot correctly. Here is the results from that test showing LTE. 6c4c71b8-2b52-a27d.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Wow, that's a really fast download speed. I wonder why the upload dropped off so much.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...