Jump to content

How to Spot Mini Macro on Macro setups (Nokia)


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

These setups consist of a Nokia Mini Macro 2.5 eNB pole mounted on a macro site connected to sector antennas. Each mini macro is capable of up to 40 MHz of total LTE spectrum for 20+20 B41 carrier aggregation and are now being utilized to bring 2.5 on air if 8T8R equipment is unavailable or does not make monetary sense. 

Nokia Mini Macro 2.5 Triband Antenna on Ericsson NV Macro
(note decaport triband antenna & Nokia Mini Macro)

5IZ5kF5.jpg

(credit mdob07)

Nokia Mini Macro 2.5 on Ericsson NV Macro 
(note 2 coax rf jumpers coming off the top of the eNB)

Pn8j1Bw.jpg

credit: mdob07

Nokia Mini Macro 2.5 on Samsung NV Macro 

yZze13F.jpg

credit: dkyeager

Nokia Mini Macro 2.5 on Alcatel-Lucent NV Macro 

jIQn7OG.jpg

credit: atomic50

Clearwire  Mini Macro Conversion 

M6imTig.jpg

6v4BpXs.jpg

credits: dkyeager

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been seeing those around lately. What are they doing with them? Replacing clear LTE sites? All the ones I've seen went on existing sites.

 

Adding 2.5 to macro sites on the cheap since they can't afford to purchase and deploy every site with 8T8R gear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adding 2.5 to macro sites on the cheap.

Must be replacing some Clear sites here since we have 8T8R stuff on everything else. Maybe even some USCC/Nextel conversions I guess.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be replacing some Clear sites here since we have 8T8R stuff on everything else. Maybe even some USCC/Nextel conversions I guess.

 

They have been used to replace Huawei equipment that was only capable of 1 carrier. They should not be replacing the Samsung 2xCA capable Clear equipment with these, as there would not be much if any benefit. I suppose it's possible they're adding these in place of Clear equipment that was never converted to B41. As Tim said they're mostly being used where 8T8Rs don't make sense yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be replacing some Clear sites here since we have 8T8R stuff on everything else. Maybe even some USCC/Nextel conversions I guess.

I doubt it as Samsung doesn't really need to replace it's own 2xCA B41 clear equipment they use on their Samsung clear LTE sites. It's a sidegrade at best and downgrade at worst. 

 

They did use these extensively for Clear Huawei conversions last year. Now they're using these to deploy new 2.5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt it as Samsung doesn't really need to replace it's own 2xCA B41 clear equipment they use on their Samsung clear LTE sites. It's a sidegrade at best and downgrade at worst. 

 

They did use these extensively for Clear Huawei conversions last year. Now they're using these to deploy new 2.5.

 

That makes sense. I only see these in the city and suburbs where Clear existed, they probably went up last year some time. I was puzzled what these new short panels on what were obviously sprint sites were until you made this thread.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes sense. I only see these in the city and suburbs where Clear existed, they probably went up last year some time. I was puzzled what these new short panels on what were obviously sprint sites were until you made this thread.

They come in several varieties. Some are connected to 2T2R antennas, others are connected to 4t4r antennas which in the future they can add another mini macro to add add more capacity and very recently we found mini macros connected to 8t8r antennas....

 

 

[emoji19]

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually look at this as an opportunity for Sprint to add B41 to places that would otherwise not have the return on investment justification.

 

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

#rachet

I actually look at this as an opportunity for Sprint to add B41 to places that would otherwise not have the return on investment justification.

Can confirm -- currently living in Ratchet City, and we didn't see any band 41 LTE anywhere in the market until these started popping up this year.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can confirm -- currently living in Ratchet City, and we didn't see any band 41 LTE anywhere in the market until these started popping up this year.

I was mostly kidding. Taking a satirical stab at an unfortunate financial situation. We can cool our jets.

Given this use case, I'd really, really love to see these blanket Lexington, KY in band 41 goodness as they really need it. I have heard some isolated reports of folks connecting to it but whenever I am in town I cannot seem to find any. As a rapidly growing city and home to a major university, they could use the added capacity these mini macros would bring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say what you want about the NSN mini macros but I am very impressed with the coverage they put out,  thanks to these mini macro deployments my home town is almost blanketed with 2.5.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These mini's 256QAM capable? I also see there are four ports on the bottom of the antenna's only 2 are being used.  Are the antenna's themselves 4T4R capable, or is that for another technology?

 

 

Yeah, places where just ~160MBps is needed, makes sense.  Also pump out fast B41 expansion.  Helpful in areas with skinny B25 channels.  Gotta remember it is still 40MHz worth of spectrum! Just wish they did 4T4R to help cell edge that much more. Use the big 8T8R gear for places that really need it most. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 4/17/2017 at 3:41 PM, lilotimz said:

Nokia Mini Macro 2.5 Triband Antenna on Ericsson NV Macro
(note decaport triband antenna & Nokia Mini Macro)

5IZ5kF5.jpg

(credit mdob07)

@lilotimz do you know the manufacturers/models of the 10-port triband  antennas Sprint has been deploying? This photo shows one of them and there is another more boxy-looking one I've seen as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RAvirani said:

@lilotimz do you know the manufacturers/models of the 10-port triband  antennas Sprint has been deploying? This photo shows one of them and there is another more boxy-looking one I've seen as well. 

APX/Commscope/KMW/Kathrein

 

--- It's off the shelf parts mostly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lilotimz said:

APX/Commscope/KMW/Kathrein

 

--- It's off the shelf parts mostly!

Interesting. I'm mostly curious about the rounder ones.

Their 2500 coverage is not great but their 800/1900 range/propagation is incredible. They are much better than the old PCS-only antennas and even put the brand new Verizon Amphenol panels to shame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. I'm mostly curious about the rounder ones.
Their 2500 coverage is not great but their 800/1900 range/propagation is incredible. They are much better than the old PCS-only antennas and even put the brand new Verizon Amphenol panels to shame. 
Yeah they were definitely optimized for low mid bands plus they're much newer designs than most of the dual band NV hex ports.

I wonder how the new octoports would compare in terms of low mid propagation...

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...