Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Nice ad placement... Haha

ee8bcbf8d7303b22520587d1eebe63d1.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

bdefcfda5c086ec33300b800b5089894.jpg

 

Received that exact ad earlier today.. It's possible that they're specifically targeting Sprint users.

I think I'll stick with my unlimited (occasional) 70Mbps though, nice try Verizon. ;)

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Received that exact ad earlier today.. It's possible that they're specifically targeting Sprint users.

I think I'll stick with my unlimited (occasional) 70Mbps though, nice try Verizon. ;)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, someone on T-Mobile's Reddit page posted about Verizon ads in speed test too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon plans to raise their unlimited data plan from $29.99 to $49.99 in November, I already pay $80/month before taxes, I'm not looking forward to be paying $100+ per month. If Verizon does raise their unlimited data plan to $49.99 then ill be switching to Sprint, first could i use my iPhone 6S Plus on Sprint? I bought it from Verizon, Will all of the bands work on Sprint? If so I can't wait to join Sprint!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon plans to raise their unlimited data plan from $29.99 to $49.99 in November, I already pay $80/month before taxes, I'm not looking forward to be paying $100+ per month. If Verizon does raise their unlimited data plan to $49.99 then ill be switching to Sprint, first could i use my iPhone 6S Plus on Sprint? I bought it from Verizon, Will all of the bands work on Sprint? If so I can't wait to join Sprint!

Yes, you should be able to use it on sprint and it has all the bands sprint uses for lte.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon plans to raise their unlimited data plan from $29.99 to $49.99 in November, I already pay $80/month before taxes, I'm not looking forward to be paying $100+ per month. If Verizon does raise their unlimited data plan to $49.99 then ill be switching to Sprint, first could i use my iPhone 6S Plus on Sprint? I bought it from Verizon, Will all of the bands work on Sprint? If so I can't wait to join Sprint!

Yes!

 

See: http://www.sprint.com/landings/bring-your-own-phone/#!/

 

See: http://www.apple.com/iphone/LTE/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon plans to raise their unlimited data plan from $29.99 to $49.99 in November, I already pay $80/month before taxes, I'm not looking forward to be paying $100+ per month. If Verizon does raise their unlimited data plan to $49.99 then ill be switching to Sprint, first could i use my iPhone 6S Plus on Sprint? I bought it from Verizon, Will all of the bands work on Sprint? If so I can't wait to join Sprint!

 

If you do plan to switch to Sprint and get on an unlimited data plan, it might be a good idea to do it before the $10 increase on the 16th of this month.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon plans to raise their unlimited data plan from $29.99 to $49.99 in November, I already pay $80/month before taxes, I'm not looking forward to be paying $100+ per month. If Verizon does raise their unlimited data plan to $49.99 then ill be switching to Sprint, first could i use my iPhone 6S Plus on Sprint? I bought it from Verizon, Will all of the bands work on Sprint? If so I can't wait to join Sprint!

Just be sure that the Sprint service in your area is adequate for your needs.  Talk with users of it in your area.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been at a conference out in Seattle (downtown) and I can say 1) LTE here is a mess. Speeds really are slow on B41. Not just on my Note, but others have Sprint too and they've been struggling. However, I've got good signal for LTE most everywhere, the speeds just suffer. 2) I've been very impressed with the battery life on the Note5. I take notes with my phone and with all that and communication with others here at conference, I've had solid battery life into the night.

 

Sent from my Sprint Note5

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been at a conference out in Seattle (downtown) and I can say 1) LTE here is a mess. Speeds really are slow on B41. Not just on my Note, but others have Sprint too and they've been struggling. However, I've got good signal for LTE most everywhere, the speeds just suffer. 2) I've been very impressed with the battery life on the Note5. I take notes with my phone and with all that and communication with others here at conference, I've had solid battery life into the night.

 

Sent from my Sprint Note5

Are there second band 41 carriers there?

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've not picked them up right around the conference center yet.

 

Sent from my Sprint Note5

Seems like seattle is in desperate need for CA and second carriers. Im sure there are also plenty of towers without band 41 too. This year Sprint has showed major coverage and capacity improvements but they have a very long way to go.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon plans to raise their unlimited data plan from $29.99 to $49.99 in November, I already pay $80/month before taxes, I'm not looking forward to be paying $100+ per month. If Verizon does raise their unlimited data plan to $49.99 then ill be switching to Sprint, first could i use my iPhone 6S Plus on Sprint? I bought it from Verizon, Will all of the bands work on Sprint? If so I can't wait to join Sprint!

 

If you do plan to switch to Sprint and get on an unlimited data plan, it might be a good idea to do it before the $10 increase on the 16th of this month.

 

That is a very valid point.  If you do plan to make the jump to Sprint, I would make your decision by 10/15 (last day to lock in that $60/mo rate) or else the rate will increase to $70/mo beginning 10/16.  You won't have time to wait until November to see if your Verizon bill will be increased to $49.99 for unlimited data which I honestly think the majority of the remaining unlimited data Verizon customers will see since they are not under contract.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the negativity comes from the C class Moody's rating. The Moody's people are not biased at all when issuing their ratings. That's a big part of the issues. I know this might be a contrarian point here, but improved network performance doesn't necessarily mean that Sprint will improve their financials.

 

Trying to improve financials and improve the network at the same time is going to be really difficult. I don't want to be Mr. Negative but if Sprint could improve both that would be unprecedented.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a very valid point. If you do plan to make the jump to Sprint, I would make your decision by 10/15 (last day to lock in that $60/mo rate) or else the rate will increase to $70/mo beginning 10/16. You won't have time to wait until November to see if your Verizon bill will be increased to $49.99 for unlimited data which I honestly think the majority of the remaining unlimited data Verizon customers will see since they are not under contract.

Unless you want 3GB of tethering. The new $70 plan has this, but the $60 plan doesn't
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you want 3GB of tethering. The new $70 plan has this, but the $60 plan doesn't

Where does it say about the 3gb tethering? Even then that would be a YMMV situation. Still good to see sprint trying to match tmobile.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say this given that I certainly am not a fan of T-Mobile, which should be quite obvious by now here on S4GRU. Also, while I wouldn't consider myself a Sprint fan, I certainly like Sprint far more than I like T-Mobile and I respect Marcelo Claure and believe when Sprint finally gets to that high position he mentions, Marcelo will end up doing more good than what many people erroneously claim John Legere "supposedly" has done.

 

With that said, if I were in Seattle, the only carrier I'd have there, or anywhere in the Pacific Northwest, is T-Mobile. Their spectrum holdings in that region are so high, giving them so much promise in capacity I just couldn't pass up if I were there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say this given that I certainly am not a fan of T-Mobile, which should be quite obvious by now here on S4GRU. Also, while I wouldn't consider myself a Sprint fan, I certainly like Sprint far more than I like T-Mobile and I respect Marcelo Claure and believe when Sprint finally gets to that high position he mentions, Marcelo will end up doing more good than what many people erroneously claim John Legere "supposedly" has done.

 

With that said, if I were in Seattle, the only carrier I'd have there, or anywhere in the Pacific Northwest, is T-Mobile. Their spectrum holdings in that region are so high, giving them so much promise in capacity I just couldn't pass up if I were there.

I agree. My cousin is in seattle and he has Tmobile and his sister has Sprint. He says Sprint has coverage but it is not as fast as Tmobile. In my area T-Mobile has very high spectrum holdings also. Basically covered in 20x20 b4 and 5x5 b12. They have enough to add a 10x10 b2 also so to me this may put tmobile in one of the best positions in my area if not the best. I would say around here Verizon, Tmobile, Sprint then At&t in Spectrum holdings. Verizon, Sprint, At&t, T-Mobile in coverage position and data reliability Verizon, Tmobile, At&t, Sprint.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where does it say about the 3gb tethering? Even then that would be a YMMV situation. Still good to see sprint trying to match tmobile.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sprint/comments/3ncviw/70_unlimited_plan_includes_3gb_hotspot/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Just needed the confirmation. This is great for those that need tethering.  Still doesn't match Tmobile's 7 GB of tethering for its unlimited data plan but 3 GB is still fine since its only $70 vs. $80 for Tmobile.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the negativity comes from the C class Moody's rating. The Moody's people are not biased at all when issuing their ratings. That's a big part of the issues. I know this might be a contrarian point here, but improved network performance doesn't necessarily mean that Sprint will improve their financials.

 

Trying to improve financials and improve the network at the same time is going to be really difficult. I don't want to be Mr. Negative but if Sprint could improve both that would be unprecedented.

I also can confirm its in the info about the new plan on our internal system.

Thanks. Just needed the confirmation. This is great for those that need tethering.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. My cousin is in seattle and he has Tmobile and his sister has Sprint. He says Sprint has coverage but it is not as fast as Tmobile. In my area T-Mobile has very high spectrum holdings also. Basically covered in 20x20 b4 and 5x5 b12. They have enough to add a 10x10 b2 also so to me this may put tmobile in one of the best positions in my area if not the best. I would say around here Verizon, Tmobile, Sprint then At&t in Spectrum holdings. Verizon, Sprint, At&t, T-Mobile in coverage position and data reliability Verizon, Tmobile, At&t, Sprint.

If only the carriers would have that spectrum here in Chicago. From what I'm aware of, which I may be wrong about a bit, AWS-1 LTE spectrum holdings here are 20x20 on Verizon, 15x15 on T-Mobile, and 10x10 on AT&T. I don't know what the low band spectrum holdings are for the carriers around here, except that Sprint has 5x5, T-Mobile doesn't have any.

 

Regarding PCS, while I'm unaware of other carriers PCS holdings except for Sprint and T-Mobile, I think T-Mobile has 10x10 for HSPA+, and 5x5 for Voice, etc., though if they were to use VoLTE and get rid of HSPA+, they could have 15x15 PCS LTE, which I believe they ought to do since Chicago is fairly dense enough already for T-Mobile, except for maybe a few areas such as on the stretch of LaGrange Road between Hodgkin's and Orland Park, which has spotty coverage on T-Mobile. That would give T-Mobile the LTE capacity of 15x15 AWS-1 and 15x15 PCS.

 

Considering Dish gave up their AWS-3 spectrum in Chicago, since T-Mobile was the second bidder for that and if they won it at the redo auction for that spectrum, it would give T-Mobile 15x15 AWS-3 spectrum, at least that is the amount I read somewhere Dish won of it. If correct, that would give T-Mobile 90mhz of spectrum for LTE here in Chicago.

 

Then, if T-Mobile were to be less conservative at the 600mhz auction and go for 15x15 of 600mhz spectrum, that would bump the spectrum here to 120mhz and make it very capable of handling unlimited data both indoors and outdoors. Meanwhile, Sprint ought to aggregate their PCS spectrum, and soon, as it'll take some time to densifying for band 41 to be competitive.

 

Chunks of 5x5 PCS just isn't enough, and is a major reason why I'm not fond of Sprint's PCS spectrum holdings. They ought to aggregate it, or swap it for some thing more like a single chunk of spectrum, or just sell it once band 41 densification is complete. The sale of it would help finance that well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If only the carriers would have that spectrum here in Chicago. From what I'm aware of, which I may be wrong about a bit, AWS-1 LTE spectrum holdings here are 20x20 on Verizon, 15x15 on T-Mobile, and 10x10 on AT&T. I don't know what the low band spectrum holdings are for the carriers around here, except that Sprint has 5x5, T-Mobile doesn't have any.

 

Regarding PCS, while I'm unaware of other carriers PCS holdings except for Sprint and T-Mobile, I think T-Mobile has 10x10 for HSPA+, and 5x5 for Voice, etc., though if they were to use VoLTE and get rid of HSPA+, they could have 15x15 PCS LTE, which I believe they ought to do since Chicago is fairly dense enough already for T-Mobile, except for maybe a few areas such as on the stretch of LaGrange Road between Hodgkin's and Orland Park, which has spotty coverage on T-Mobile. That would give T-Mobile the LTE capacity of 15x15 AWS-1 and 15x15 PCS.

 

Considering Dish gave up their AWS-3 spectrum in Chicago, since T-Mobile was the second bidder for that and if they won it at the redo auction for that spectrum, it would give T-Mob 

Then, if T-Mobile were to be less conservative at the 600mhz auction and go for 15x15 of 600mhz spectrum, that would bump the spectrum here to 120mhz and make it very capable of handling unlimited data both indoors and outdoors. Meanwhile, Sprint ought to aggregate their PCS spectrum, and soon, as it'll take some time to densifying for band 41 to be competitive.

 

Chunks of 5x5 PCS just isn't enough, and is a major reason why I'm not fond of Sprint's PCS spectrum holdings. They ought to aggregate it, or swap it for some thing more like a single chunk of spectrum, or just sell it once band 41 densification is complete. The sale of it would help finance that well.

 

Sprint can't easily aggregate its 5x5 PCS LTE carriers on their network currently because Sprint has yet to sell any devices which allow B25-B25 CA.  What Sprint really needs to do to begin transition to PCS LTE CA  is by starting to sell B25-B25 CA devices in its 2016 flagships so that the phones going forward are able to support this feature even though its not currently configured at the NV site.  Even if Sprint had the resources to do this currently on the network they can't since customers will not be able to connect to it.  Now this is not to confuse this with markets that currently deploy 10x10 LTE since it uses contiguous spectrum which Sprint has been supporting on its phones for the last 2-3 years which doesn't use CA.

 

I am glad Sprint starting supported B41-B41 CA but they really need to add B25-B25 CA in the future since Sprint eventually will phase out CDMA and it would be nice to aggregate their PCS A-F blocks with the non-contiguous PCS G block to create faster speeds and wider channels.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how many times we've restated this. There will be no band 25 intraband carrier aggregation.

 

Sprint macro network equipment are not capable due it's manufacturing and design generation and there is absolutely 0 plans to do so.

 

Just drop it. It's simply not going to happen.

 

Sent from my LG-H790

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how many times we've restated this. There will be no band 25 intraband carrier aggregation.

 

Sprint macro network equipment are not capable due it's manufacturing and design generation and there is absolutely 0 plans to do so.

 

Just drop it. It's simply not going to happen.

 

Sent from my LG-H790

If nothing can be done but to leave PCS at 5x5, then while I understand the importance of PCS while Sprint still is densifying their network for band 41, which considering Sprint's vast amounts of band 41 spectrum, especially when it's in more use with a denser network upon completion of NGN and 3x CA, at that point it just doesn't make sense to have such limited chunks of 5x5 PCS that won't provide the same high quality experience of band 41, nor provide the in-building experience of Sprint's low band spectrum.

 

I think Sprint would do better by participating in the 600mhz auction and try to get at least 10x10, if not more, like 15x15 of the spectrum, then begin selling off some PCS spectrum, until they can implement the 600mhz spectrum fully, which then Sprint could sell of as much PCS spectrum as they need to cover those auction costs.

 

Sprint would do fine having 120mhz band 41 and 30mhz of 600mhz spectrum, if they went for 15x15 of 600mhz, which would be good enough capacity, speed, and building penetration, also covering distance where band 41 still doesn't reach enough, areas that PCS wouldn't even do so well at either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...