Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - East Michigan Market (Detroit/Flint/Ann Arbor/Tri-Cities)


ReyBanz

Recommended Posts

Good to know!   Thanks Mr. Z!      With 800 work starting on some towers, I'm hoping they put it on all the towers in the area.    I'm wondering if the "Bridge Tower", as I call it, on the North End of town is the 800mHz I pick up at Home Depot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there was action on my most local cell site yesterday located at 3666 M36, Pinckney, MI. I saw a crew from B&M Tower out of Fenton, MI climbed up on the site doing something with the panels. Not sure what... after the work I noticed a second B25 10x10 carrier lit up. Wonder if they were installing 800MHZ RRU's? This particular site wasn't supposed to get low band until Oct 2018 I heard though. Weird... One can only hope it was! LOL

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to know! Thanks Mr. Z! With 800 work starting on some towers, I'm hoping they put it on all the towers in the area. I'm wondering if the "Bridge Tower", as I call it, on the North End of town is the 800mHz I pick up at Home Depot?

Exactly where is this bridge site? Are you talking about the Home Depot on Avon? That place is a pit for cell service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The South-Hill Bridge (Main Street) by the Cadillac Dealer... along the Clinton River...       By the way... it's 8:35pm and the network is acting up again... I only have 1x at the house right now??   WTH??    I don't believe they would be working on towers at this hour as its getting dark....   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The South-Hill Bridge (Main Street) by the Cadillac Dealer... along the Clinton River...       By the way... it's 8:35pm and the network is acting up again... I only have 1x at the house right now??   WTH??    I don't believe they would be working on towers at this hour as its getting dark....

I am guessing that you're talking about the site I was talking about earlier, the tall guyed tower north of the river, kind of between Second and the river.

 

Sending message with contact details. I have a couple of people at my limited disposal, both Sprint and Ericsson. They don't work for me, but have been happy to help me so far. Call or text next time. Worst case, maybe meet up for a wine or something. Wife, girlfriend, whatever invited. It's interesting to meet people from the internets to work on real world problems sometimes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
1 hour ago, dro1984 said:

Sprint must be in the area servicing local towers in the last few weeks... I've started seeing Band 41x3 on my phone in the last week.   Carrier aggregation is alive and well!   

That doesn't mean CA, its just a known third carrier that you are connected to

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dro1984 said:

Sprint must be in the area servicing local towers in the last few weeks... I've started seeing Band 41x3 on my phone in the last week.   Carrier aggregation is alive and well!   

SCP cannot tell you when CA is active, it can only tell you which carrier you are connected to for the primary channel. B41^3 just indicates you are connected to the third carrier. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback.  Regardless, it's nice to see things improving.  Up until recently, there was no 3rd carrier.   It just started showing up recently.  Am glad for improvements happening.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like more 800mhz action by my house..  this time on a second tower located in Pinckney 1x800 and LTE800 was on for a few hours today then turned off around 5:00. The other tower off us23 I reported a few weeks ago has the 1x800 fully active now. Took some pics while the 800mhz was active earlier. Screenshot_20170913-161602.png

Screenshot_20170913-161619.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rocketr said:

Looks like more 800mhz action by my house..  this time on a second tower located in Pinckney 1x800 and LTE800 was on for a few hours today then turned off around 5:00. The other tower off us23 I reported a few weeks ago has the 1x800 fully active now. Took some pics while the 800mhz was active earlier.

Screenshot_20170913-161619.png

 

B26 LTE 800 3x3  max speed is 21.7.  Nice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, rocketr said:

Looks like more 800mhz action by my house..  this time on a second tower located in Pinckney 1x800 and LTE800 was on for a few hours today then turned off around 5:00. The other tower off us23 I reported a few weeks ago has the 1x800 fully active now. Took some pics while the 800mhz was active earlier. Screenshot_20170913-161602.png

Screenshot_20170913-161619.png

Be prepared for it to get overwhelmed very quickly and basically unusable.  Not trying to be debbie downer, but on the westside of Michigan, B26 has become a joke.  I had to disable it on my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jefbal99 said:

Be prepared for it to get overwhelmed very quickly and basically unusable.  Not trying to be debbie downer, but on the westside of Michigan, B26 has become a joke.  I had to disable it on my Nexus 6P

I live in a pretty rural area... I think it will be better then 3G in certain areas. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rocketr said:

I live in a pretty rural area... I think it will be better then 3G in certain areas. ;)

That's what I thought too, but it wasn't the experience.  Just think about any one in their house with a phone in their pocket, or an older home with poor RF reception.  They'll be in the area you'd expect B41 or B25, but they will move to B26, then stay there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jefbal99 said:

That's what I thought too, but it wasn't the experience.  Just think about any one in their house with a phone in their pocket, or an older home with poor RF reception.  They'll be in the area you'd expect B41 or B25, but they will move to B26, then stay there.

It all will depend on the tower spacing and optimization. B26 performs pretty decently in most of rural Oregon.  However, does not in West Michigan.  It really depends on how many customers are outside B25/B41 coverage. It needs to be as few as possible. And B26 should not be used for capacity. Or CA, IMHO. 

Where the network is set up this way, it seems to work pretty well.  Although, I have to admit Tmo has problems on B12 in places too. Tmo has a B12 site in my county on top of South Mountain.  It covers the whole county. One sector covers 50,000 people.  If you ever end up on B12 in that sector in between sites, you will get no throughput or measure your speed in mere bytes with a ping out of this world.  Network/sector design and optimization is critical on low bands over wide areas.

Think of a Triband site with 3xCA B41 and 2 B25 carriers.  In this example working out from the tower, not counting HPUE, B41 will cover 2 miles out, B25 4 miles out and B26 6 miles out. 

B41 is 12.5 sq mi, B25 is 37.5 sq miles beyond B41, B26 is another ~80 sq miles beyond that.  So the first 12.5 sq miles around the tower is covered in 60MHz of B41.  The second ring is 50 square miles, but the amount outside of B41 coverage is 37.5 sq miles.  Three times more area, but at least still has 10MHz of DL spectrum. Maybe 15 if a 10 & 5 PCS market.

But bad things happen when you get to that outer B26 ring.  That outer B26 ring is 112 square miles around the tower (at 6 mi radius).  When you subtract out the inner rings your left with just under 80 sq miles you are covering with just 5MHz of B26.  Way more area than the other two.  And that if it is optimized.

Even in a well optimized network, there still will be B26 usage inside the B41 and B25 rings too, deep inside buildings, etc.  Also, B26 will likely go beyond the 6 miles in this scenario, picking up even more customers. A lot for one 5MHz carrier to do.  And then consider doing it with 3 MHz.

Sprint must keep B26 purely for "out of ring" customers and "deep penetration" customers. Also, if too many customers end up in the outer ring and performance suffers below a certain threshold, a new macro site is warranted. Or if a major part of the congestion is one part of the outer band, maybe even a well placed small cell.

In a place like urban/suburban Detroit or Seattle, a 3MHz B26 channel might do OK. Because the network B25 coverage is already OK, nearly ubiquitous. B26 can just fill in the shadows and deep penetration.  They will just need to manage it very firmly.  Continued B41 rollout will help.  

It's the rural areas, especially places like Michigan, that have the toughest time.  Out in the West, in rural areas, most people live concentrically around a town. You get 4 miles out of town and density drops dramatically.  However, in Michigan (and many other places), the rural town may have 2,500 people but the surrounding townships and county have 25,000 people all scattered about.  And the tower is in the town. And the concentric circles start from there. Leaving thousands to share their small piece of the spectrum pie. Only in B26.

Posted using Pixel XL with S4GRU Mobile

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, S4GRU said:

It all will depend on the tower spacing and optimization. B26 performs pretty decently in most of rural Oregon.  However, does not in West Michigan.  It really depends on how many customers are outside B25/B41 coverage. It needs to be as few as possible. And B26 should not be used for capacity. Or CA, IMHO. 

Where the network is set up this way, it seems to work pretty well.  Although, I have to admit Tmo has problems on B12 in places too. Tmo has a B12 site in my county on top of South Mountain.  It covers the whole county. One sector covers 50,000 people.  If you ever end up on B12 in that sector in between sites, you will get no throughput or measure your speed in mere bytes with a ping out of this world.  Network/sector design and optimization is critical on low bands over wide areas.

Think of a Triband site with 3xCA B41 and 2 B25 carriers.  In this example working out from the tower, not counting HPUE, B41 will cover 2 miles out, B25 4 miles out and B26 6 miles out. 

B41 is 12.5 sq mi, B25 is 37.5 sq miles beyond B41, B26 is another ~80 sq miles beyond that.  So the first 12.5 sq miles around the tower is covered in 60MHz of B41.  The second ring is 50 square miles, but the amount outside of B41 coverage is 37.5 sq miles.  Three times more area, but at least still has 10MHz of DL spectrum. Maybe 15 if a 10 & 5 PCS market.

But bad things happen when you get to that outer B26 ring.  That outer B26 ring is 112 square miles around the tower (at 6 mi radius).  When you subtract out the inner rings your left with just under 80 sq miles you are covering with just 5MHz of B26.  Way more area than the other two.  And that if it is optimized.

Even in a well optimized network, there still will be B26 usage inside the B41 and B25 rings too, deep inside buildings, etc.  Also, B26 will likely go beyond the 6 miles in this scenario, picking up even more customers. A lot for one 5MHz carrier to do.  And then consider doing it with 3 MHz.

Sprint must keep B26 purely for "out of ring" customers and "deep penetration" customers. Also, if too many customers end up in the outer ring and performance suffers below a certain threshold, a new macro site is warranted. Or if a major part of the congestion is one part of the outer band, maybe even a well placed small cell.

In a place like urban/suburban Detroit or Seattle, a 3MHz B26 channel might do OK. Because the network B25 coverage is already OK, nearly ubiquitous. B26 can just fill in the shadows and deep penetration.  They will just need to manage it very firmly.  Continued B41 rollout will help.  

It's the rural areas, especially places like Michigan, that have the toughest time.  Out in the West, in rural areas, most people live concentrically around a town. You get 4 miles out of town and density drops dramatically.  However, in Michigan (and many other places), the rural town may have 2,500 people but the surrounding townships and county have 25,000 people all scattered about.  And the tower is in the town. And the concentric circles start from there. Leaving thousands to share their small piece of the spectrum pie. Only in B26.

Posted using Pixel XL with S4GRU Mobile

So much great information here, thanks for the long reply :)

Few notes/additions:

1. West Michigan Tower spacing is terrible, the network was originally built by iPCS before being acquired by Sprint.  The layout was at max spacing for phones with external antennas.  It has gotten better, but still needs a great deal of densification.

2. Sprint is not doing a good job of keeping users in the B25/B41 rings off from B26.  Not sure if it is due to a lack of capacity on B41, but my Nexus 6P would never use B25, it was always B41 or B26, until B26 was disabled.  I would be outside walking and see one or two macro sites in Lansing, MI, would never touch B25.  Something with the load balancing or priority is funky.  I've tried to work with Sprint support a few times, but it never leads anywhere.

3. Towers in West Michigan follow the freeways for the most part, so if the town/city is a mile or two from the freeway, B41 is under utilized.

4. 10x10 B25 seems to be under utilized in this region, always great performance when on that carrier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jefbal99 said:

So much great information here, thanks for the long reply :)

Few notes/additions:

1. West Michigan Tower spacing is terrible, the network was originally built by iPCS before being acquired by Sprint.  The layout was at max spacing for phones with external antennas.  It has gotten better, but still needs a great deal of densification.

2. Sprint is not doing a good job of keeping users in the B25/B41 rings off from B26.  Not sure if it is due to a lack of capacity on B41, but my Nexus 6P would never use B25, it was always B41 or B26, until B26 was disabled.  I would be outside walking and see one or two macro sites in Lansing, MI, would never touch B25.  Something with the load balancing or priority is funky.  I've tried to work with Sprint support a few times, but it never leads anywhere.

3. Towers in West Michigan follow the freeways for the most part, so if the town/city is a mile or two from the freeway, B41 is under utilized.

4. 10x10 B25 seems to be under utilized in this region, always great performance when on that carrier

If you’d like, I can connect you with an upper level network engineer in your area that will work with you to resolve these issues. Send me a PM if you’re interested. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RAvirani said:

If you’d like, I can connect you with an upper level network engineer in your area that will work with you to resolve these issues. Send me a PM if you’re interested. 

rgr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jefbal99 said:

*** 3. Towers in West Michigan follow the freeways for the most part, so if the town/city is a mile or two from the freeway, B41 is under utilized.

This is the biggest problem most carriers.  The game has changed and they, for the most part, have not adapted.  It kills me when some of these towns turn down towers being built within the city limits.  

Verizon has started re-spacing their towers in my county.  They have built 6 new towers in the last year.  That is an impressive investment for a rural county.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is working to address many issues.... but I wish they would address a long time "black hole" in their coverage.   

65 S. Livernois in the Kroger plaza... almost "0" signal especially in the store.   3G at best (1 or 2 bars outside in  parking lot).   Quite sad.  Worse yet, Rochester High School is right across the street.  You know there are many Sprint phones in the kids possession M-F (maybe... maybe not anymore...).    I've used the Sprint app to report, but after 10 or 12 years, it's odd nothing gets done.    T-mobile, my other phone, went from and indoor fair signal to nearly full bars in the last couple of years in the same locale...    Ahh.... yeah....   Perfect spot for a Magic Box or 2 or 3....    

Edited by dro1984
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
17 minutes ago, dro1984 said:

Sprint Network down this morning in the Rochester/Auburn Hills area.   5am- 6:? am... No Service.

Went out on the West side of Michigan about 4:45a, came back at 6:40a

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...