Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Missouri Market (includes St. Louis)


riddlebox

Recommended Posts

Look at the NV Sites complete map! That's where I was getting my info in the first place.

I didn't get a notification of an acceptance report.

 

Edit: Nevermind, it was just behind all of the notifications from this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've never seen the NV Sites complete map?? Lilg just linked you to it.

By the way when updating the icon type it is case sensitive. Purple_circle confused fusion table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

has anyone checked the site near 94 & Woodstream (just west of Jungermann)?  There is a lot of dark purple along 94 there that fades as you go west.

I didnt have anything this morning going through there. im going to pull off and check when i get back out there in about an hour and a half.

 

It was that dark purple early this morning.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok. Was that the Earth City site?

No, when David updated the sheet he put Purple_circle instead of purple_circle so the 2 ones that were supposed to be purple were the default red dot. Its fixed now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got off the phone with someone at Sprint Customer Care about the Mobile Hotspot data plans... they were trying to talk me out of purchasing one because "there is no LTE in St. Louis."

 

I did the best I could not to laugh.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Checked out the newly accepted 4G site in IL on Stevenson Rd. near Lebanon Rd.  Mapped a bit with Sensorly until my phone died, and got the SCIDs:121 - 290 - 459

 

lmgXqd9.jpg

 

yRNnZJt.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice clean install and site, is Sprint the only carrier.  Reminds me of the 2 sector site south of my area where Sprint is the only carrier and legacy is 100% gone.  Nice and clean looking.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry about the pic...I had to give the FZ back... :td: and I was shooting into the sun and didn't look at the pic until after I got to church.

 

St. James road in rural part of Edwardsville (159 and St. James Dr)

9359674197_31b964084d_h_d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No LTE at 94 and Jungerman again

I ate at Popeye's near ther and the WalMart and no LTE for me either.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...