Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Boston Market (all of Massachusetts)


brendan4t

Recommended Posts

blinkah-warning-1.jpg

 

FAHKIN' A!  THAT'S A WICKED PISSAH!

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

How would you all describe Sprint's site density in Boston? In my opinion, the city itself is great but the suburbs could be better. Newton in particular is poor. I feel like there is a strong sense of NIMBY-ism. There's even an area where I fall down to one bar of EVDO while outdoors. But it's not limited to Sprint. Every carrier falls to 1 bar in that area since basically every carrier is on the same sites throughout the town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you all describe Sprint's site density in Boston? In my opinion, the city itself is great but the suburbs could be better. Newton in particular is poor. I feel like there is a strong sense of NIMBY-ism. There's even an area where I fall down to one bar of EVDO while outdoors. But it's not limited to Sprint. Every carrier falls to 1 bar in that area since basically every carrier is on the same sites throughout the town.

I wouldn't use Newton as a measuring stick for the suburbs.. that might as well be its own country. In general, most areas are fine, and the major providers are all on equal footing as far as coverage goes. Inside 495, you won't find many coverage holes for any of them.

 

-Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I wouldn't use Newton as a measuring stick for the suburbs.. that might as well be its own country. In general, most areas are fine, and the major providers are all on equal footing as far as coverage goes. Inside 495, you won't find many coverage holes for any of them.

 

-Mike

I live in North Framingham near Sudbury. My neighborhood is a data dead zone. Calls are OK.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Spent the weekend visiting family in Winchester. Must say, was highly disappointed with the LTE progress.

 

DISCLAIMER: I have a single band Galaxy S4.

 

For reference of the area I was in, this is the wimax map. See the circled area? 99% of that mapping was done by me when I was visiting during prior years. That was done with a galaxy s2.

 

lte1_zps76db732c.png

 

 

This time, others had already done some mapping for me, but this is the area I mapped in red.

 

lte2_zps5fa12326.png

 

Notice the lack of coverage? That's not because it hasn't been mapped...it's because there's no LTE!

 

I thought LTE was supposed to have better range than wimax?

 

I tried the airplane mode trick a couple of times to no avail. Also, it's winter, so the lack of leaves on trees should result in the highest signal reach, right?

 

 

This was especially bad...I found myself roaming near downtown Winchester! In the past, Id roamed inside restaurants there, but I cant remember roaming while driving down a road before. While Winchester is suburban, downtown Winchester is your classic old New England center, with pretty dense construction, lots of people walking around, and commuter rail service (2 stations). Having a triband phone wont solve this problem.

 

Notice the roaming. Data was so slow the map wouldnt load!

 

lte3_zps0b1d5a74.png

 

 

Looks like someone got a signal on the train, meanwhile I was roaming!

 

lte4_zps0c4cf07f.png

 

I also checked the voice quality inside my dads house. When we adopted Sprint, it was great. However, a year later, as NV hit the nearby tower, quality declined greatly. We were given a free airave and were told it would be fixed.

 

He's kept the airave ever since, but I decided to discconect it and see if the phones worked fine without it. I was hopeful that 800 along with newer phones with better antenna would mean no more airave.

 

Nope, the voice kept dropping every few words. So airave stays.

 

I was just there for two days, so maybe I was unlucky, but it seems like somehow a gap of service EXPANDED with NV, rather than decreased. I don't understand why.

 

As for Amtrak, I got a great LTE connection between Boston and Providence. Even at 128mph (above the limit!), streaming music worked just fine. Connecticut though? Even surfing the web was a hassle, and spotify kept buffering.

 

lte5_zps72986840.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ironic that you noted the great Clear WiMax coverage in the area, and then use a device that will not let you use the Clear WiMax/LTE sites in the area. Uniband users are limited in old WiMax areas and miss out on thousands of square miles of LTE coverage.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ironic that you noted the great Clear WiMax coverage in the area, and then use a device that will not let you use the Clear WiMax/LTE sites in the area. Uniband users are limited in old WiMax areas and miss out on thousands of square miles of LTE coverage.

 

Perfect example of this occurred today. I accompanied my friend to Best Buy in Watertown, MA. We had been looking up what the tax rate was and we were both on a strong 3G signal but it was on legacy backhaul so the site wasn't fast. All of a sudden, my M8 connected to a weak Band 41 signal while his iPhone 5 was stranded on the strong but not so speedy 3G signal. 

 

Having a Spark device matters way more than many think.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ironic that you noted the great Clear WiMax coverage in the area, and then use a device that will not let you use the Clear WiMax/LTE sites in the area. Uniband users are limited in old WiMax areas and miss out on thousands of square miles of LTE coverage.

 

I dont think ironic is quite the right word. I dont think anyone who made the change from S2 to S4, including myself, regret it. My S2 was a disaster by the end so I was eager to upgrade, and did so knowing that Id be missing out on triband for awhile. Frankly, two years of single band is preferable for me to what would have been 5 more months with the S2 waiting for the S4 triband model.

 

However, I do find it unfortunate that at year end 2014, the base lte coverage for single band phone users in that specific area relevant to my interests does not match the wimax coverage of the past, especially when taking into account the frequencies. I was eager to map the area, as in the past, and was hoping to paint the map purple.

 

By this time next year, I should be able to map with a triband phone. July I think actually.

 

The new roaming is obviously a whole other issue, because the phone should be able to grab 800 voice just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Finally, I head in to Boston pretty often from Chestnut Hill. It's about time I had native service in the subways.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was in Boston the other week around the time of the first blizzard and it was really nice to have service on the T. Better late than never I guess. Things overall seemed a little slower than I remember from my last visit though. Still a lot better than my home market for sure.

 

On a unrelated note, is it me or does it seem like every other person in Boston is wearing a Canada Goose parka? They're everywhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in Boston the other week around the time of the first blizzard and it was really nice to have service on the T. Better late than never I guess. Things overall seemed a little slower than I remember from my last visit though. Still a lot better than my home market for sure.

 

On a unrelated note, is it me or does it seem like every other person in Boston is wearing a Canada Goose parka? They're everywhere.

 

It's currently trending. Everyone in the Northeast is wearing Canada Goose from NYC to Boston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a unrelated note, is it me or does it seem like every other person in Boston is wearing a Canada Goose parka? They're everywhere.

 

Bain Capital.  Mitt Romney.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bain Capital. Mitt Romney.

 

AJ

They seem to be popular with younger types so I would blame easy money student loans. Dopey parents too.

 

Edit: I was wondering what your Bain angle was! Just looked it up. I had no idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edit: I was wondering what your Bain angle was! Just looked it up. I had no idea.

 

I was mostly being facetious.  But the Canada Goose, Bain Capital, Mitt Romney, and Boston correlation is interesting.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's currently trending. Everyone in the Northeast is wearing Canada Goose from NYC to Boston.

 

Canada Goose + Bean Boot.

 

At least they are North American products made in Canada and Maine.

 

Better than the many trends of Made in China junk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canada Goose + Bean Boot.

 

At least they are North American products made in Canada and Maine.

 

Better than the many trends of Made in China junk.

Canada Goose, Bean Boots, Vineyard Vines. The official uniform of Boston College.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canada Goose, Bean Boots, Vineyard Vines. The official uniform of Boston College.

 

I eat lunch at the pru often as I work in the area.

 

I try to avoid looking at the people that shop at Vineyard Vines but it is hard as it is right next to the food court.

 

 

Did you ever make it to the Super 88 Food Court?  PhoViet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed a new tower is planned to go up in front of the Pru at the Boylston St entrance. I kind of like the little open space that was there. Given the boom in building in Boston the last few years I'm not too surprised. I usually stay in the Financial District and that has been non stop building there. Cambridge too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...