Jump to content

Sprint LTE May 2012 Schedule Maps


Recommended Posts

Where is St. Louis on the grid?

 

On a side note, I had a friend come down to Carbondale for SIU's graduation. His phone worked great. My 4S became a paperweight on the EV-DO network there and VZW support told me to get a 4G LTE device. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On HoFo someone found a live LTE site near Highland, IN, which is in the Chicago metro SE of the Loop.

 

A member from Athens, GA has been posting speedtests for a few weeks from his Nexus or whatever they are calling the new LTE one.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is St. Louis on the grid?

 

I've been anxiously waiting for updated news on STL too. I check this site several times per day already and getting my Evo LTE has only encouraged me to check more often lol.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Portland, OR is on the hook up w/4G/LTE, does anyone know when Little Rock, AR will enjoy the same?

 

Have they started in Portland, OR yet? I'm in the Portland/Vancouver, so this would be great news!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only approx. 1% of the sites have been converted in the DC market. Unless you were connected to one of the upgraded towers, you wouldn't notice any improvements. It will take the average market 6 months to complete NV from start to finish, it will take 9-12 months in the largest markets.

 

Robert

 

So for the DC/VA/MD area, it will take until the end of the year?? Was hoping for sooner, but I guess it's not too bad considering other markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So for the DC/VA/MD area, it will take until the end of the year?? Was hoping for sooner, but I guess it's not too bad considering other markets.

 

I hope that's not true. Just got a G-Nex from the misses and was hoping to experience some 4G speeds.....sooner than later but it doesn't look that way :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I hope that's not true. Just got a G-Nex from the misses and was hoping to experience some 4G speeds.....sooner than later but it doesn't look that way :(

 

The market will start seeing LTE soon. And sites will come live every week. However, it will take more than 6 months to complete every site in the market.

 

Even Verizon hasn't completed every site in the market. Not even close. Remain calm.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are so paranoid about Network Vision not being completed. Robert has to wait the longest for NV in his area, and I have to wait until next year for both areas I live at. The band-aid fixes that Sprint has done in my areas have helped a lot, and will get me by until NV arrives next year some time. If anything, those of us who have to wait until 2013 before Sprint gets to our areas have the right to go crazy. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is just frustrating to go a two miles down the road to the grocery store and have 1.5Mbps-2.0Mbps download speeds then come home and be lucky to hit 100Kbps. So close!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The market will start seeing LTE soon. And sites will come live every week. However, it will take more than 6 months to complete every site in the market.

 

Even Verizon hasn't completed every site in the market. Not even close. Remain calm.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Thank you Robert for the helpful and up to date information. It is much appreciated

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much does someone have to pay to become a sponsor? Is there a minimum/suggest amount etc? TIA CJ

 

I threw $20 into the pot, but I think you can donate any amount. I plan on adding more, but family and life comes first.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I threw $20 into the pot, but I think you can donate any amount. I plan on adding more, but family and life comes first.

 

I started with $20, too. And have been making additional donations along the way (usually monthly).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...