Jump to content

Athens, GA LTE


danielholt

Recommended Posts

I'll still try while I'm down there, just in case by freak chance. Also, Sprint can still push PRL's to my Viper since that was the only way they fixed my 3G data this last week.

 

Right, they can change it, but you can't (at least currently).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I have not received any inside information to back this up, I'm expecting there to be an OTA that comes out within the next few weeks. And when it does, Sprint will claim the OTA will open up the device to use LTE, and then they will stop unblocking the network.

 

Robert, I am quoting you back to you but is this the OTA info that you are referring to?:

 

"It is anticipated that Sprint will offer sometime in June the ability for the Galaxy Nexus to go into LTE Self Discovery mode, where the device will be able to search for a LTE signal on it is own, and turn LTE off itself automatically if it cannot connect to LTE 1900. This would be a pretty desirable setting. Keeping a LTE signal when at all possible, but minimizing the battery drain of just leaving the LTE on all the time. This will be particularly important during the phase while Sprint is in the process of adding service in your area. Self discovery mode is likely to be added via an OTA.

 

Another aspect of the Galaxy Nexus is that it fully supports eHRPD. This is the protocol established to allow 3G EVDO to seamlessly handoff to 4G LTE. Back and forth. This will be especially helpful in travelling in and out of LTE service while it is under deployment. The eHRPD will be a welcome improvement over the handoff failures that customers often complained about between 3G EVDO and 4G WiMax. Let's hope that Sprint's eHRPD is more successful than Verizon's. Which is often one of the culprits heard blamed for Verizon's LTE outages that keep occurring."

 

This is from your article:

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-117-confirmed-sprint-targeting-april-15th-for-galaxy-nexus-launch/

 

Thanks.

 

Mav. :cool:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Robert is referring to an OTA for the Evo 4G LTE; Sprint had apparently originally planned to delay the release to June 10 to fix an LTE connectivity issue on the Evo, but instead they decided (probably to beat the date when people who bought the original Evo would begin rolling off-contract) to go ahead with the now-infamous May 18 date.

 

LTE Self-Discovery may also be part of the Evo's OTA (and surely it will be coming at some point, as it is for the Galaxy Nexus), but that's not the real motivation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Robert is referring to an OTA for the Evo 4G LTE; Sprint had apparently originally planned to delay the release to June 10 to fix an LTE connectivity issue on the Evo' date=' but instead they decided (probably to beat the date when people who bought the original Evo would begin rolling off-contract) to go ahead with the now-infamous May 18 date.

 

LTE Self-Discovery may also be part of the Evo's OTA (and surely it will be coming at some point, as it is for the Galaxy Nexus), but that's not the real motivation.[/quote']

 

As usual, Chris is right on. I think the LTE Connectivity issue OTA fix may possibly come out stealthily with another OTA, like the LTE Self Discovery OTA. And I certainly don't expect Sprint to call it exactly what it is. Although, they may say the OTA allows it to connect to the LTE network, as if it was always planned that way.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did they not stick with the original launch date in the first place? Yeah, launch a device that has customs issues and LTE issues, on a network that is not even close to be fully baked. Sorry to the EVO LTE owners but that sucks Sprint put you in that spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did they not stick with the original launch date in the first place? Yeah, launch a device that has customs issues and LTE issues, on a network that is not even close to be fully baked. Sorry to the EVO LTE owners but that sucks Sprint put you in that spot.

 

Retention of the OG Evo buyers I'd imagine was a big part of it. And the customs issues could have just as easily arisen with a delayed launch; customs is apparently holding up all of HTC's shipments to check every crate for compliance with the ITC order (which may be within their rights but my understanding is that multiweek delays for established importers are very uncommon, to say the least, especially after letting through earlier shipments of the same products), and I doubt they'll let up anytime soon.

 

By all accounts the Evo LTE is a great device and a good performer on 3G, 1x, and WiFi, and has the exact same access to LTE as everyone else on Sprint (i.e. none, officially). The LTE network isn't there yet, but it's not like the phone's useless without it. And whatever LTE connectivity issues there are with the Evo (it's not at all clear what they are) are likely to be fixed before most users ever experience them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

while I am extremely disappointed with the way sprint are selling LTE devices before the network is ready.... Verizon more or less did the same thing early last year... I believe initially verizon only had LTE deployed in a handful of markets, I believe NFL markets only..... however they were pushing LTE handsets (i.e. thunderbolt) everywhere with a nationwide LTE campaign on TV..

 

heres where the rub is, while verizon were guilty of this practice, they STILL had LTE deployed at the time the handsets were sold, LTE was up and running in the major NFL cities. Sprint has nothing, nada, ziltch. A test tower here and there, with no sense of a deployment date.... I seriously doubt they will turn the switch in June, I am not sure if its a sponsor only piece of data, so I won't quote it, but the actual amount of live LTE (but blocked) towers are miniscule. I am not trying to lead a mutiny against sprint, cause I am beating the drum for unlimited national LTE data, but this was all handled wrong. by the end of 2012 there will be only a handful of markets running, by 2013 theyll be converting to 800mhz LTE, rendering these current handsets not useless, but.... enough to make me go ... GAHHH why didnt I wait!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Retention of the OG Evo buyers I'd imagine was a big part of it. And the customs issues could have just as easily arisen with a delayed launch; customs is apparently holding up all of HTC's shipments to check every crate for compliance with the ITC order (which may be within their rights but my understanding is that multiweek delays for established importers are very uncommon, to say the least, especially after letting through earlier shipments of the same products), and I doubt they'll let up anytime soon.

 

By all accounts the Evo LTE is a great device and a good performer on 3G, 1x, and WiFi, and has the exact same access to LTE as everyone else on Sprint (i.e. none, officially). The LTE network isn't there yet, but it's not like the phone's useless without it. And whatever LTE connectivity issues there are with the Evo (it's not at all clear what they are) are likely to be fixed before most users ever experience them.

 

I didn't want to seem like I was just singling out Sprint. AT&T isn't saying a peep yet about the One X LTE/Wi-Fi issues it has, or their own customs issues. AT&T will soon issue the 1.85 update that should fix a lot of the issues. It just sucks users have to be the beta testers here. I don't find it surprising these issues are popping up with the S4, a chipset with loads of potential but still having bugs to work out. That is a big reason why I have not yet pulled the trigger on a One X yet. I unfortunately don't live in a town with much in the way of native Sprint coverage so that rules the EVO out for me.

Edited by Fraydog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the deal with shoddy Android phone quality and Android phones basically released as betas? The EVO 4g LTE purportedly has reboot, WIFI, 3G and bluetooth issues. Reminds me of the Nexus S, the Galaxy Nexus, the LG G2x, the Galaxy S II, the Motorola Photon, and the Droid X. Each of those phones had issues either with reboots, and/or wifi and cellular connectivity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the deal with shoddy Android phone quality and Android phones basically released as betas? The EVO 4g LTE purportedly has reboot, WIFI, 3G and bluetooth issues. Reminds me of the Nexus S, the Galaxy Nexus, the LG G2x, the Galaxy S II, the Motorola Photon, and the Droid X. Each of those phones had issues either with reboots, and/or wifi and cellular connectivity.

 

It might have something to do with the need to differentiate one's self from all the other manufacturers using the same platform. I do believe they need to slow down the torrent of handset releases to test each handset more thoroughly. This business of a handset/month has to stop to allow for more thorough testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might have something to do with the need to differentiate one's self from all the other manufacturers using the same platform. I do believe they need to slow down the torrent of handset releases to test each handset more thoroughly. This business of a handset/month has to stop to allow for more thorough testing.

 

true, but people also don't want to wait a year+ for an iphone refresh either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the deal with shoddy Android phone quality and Android phones basically released as betas? The EVO 4g LTE purportedly has reboot, WIFI, 3G and bluetooth issues. Reminds me of the Nexus S, the Galaxy Nexus, the LG G2x, the Galaxy S II, the Motorola Photon, and the Droid X. Each of those phones had issues either with reboots, and/or wifi and cellular connectivity.

 

I wouldn't single out Android phones for this type of complaint. iPhones are released with bugs and issues that need fixes. iOS updates are released that then need to be patched because they broke something else. Windows phones have issues as well. With iPhone, you only have one manufacturer so the variety of complaints are limited and iPhone users seem to be much more tolerant of issues.

 

The phone buying public wants new devices released regularly and without delays but then can't understand why there are issues upon launch. We then want manufacturers to support our devices forever, while still keeping up with our rapid update and release demands. Oh and make sure each phone you release has every piece of new tech, even the stuff that's not fully developed yet. Make sure it all works perfectly when I get it. Oh yeah, and definitely make sure I don't have to pay more than $199.00 for it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

true, but people also don't want to wait a year+ for an iphone refresh either.

 

If by people you mean phone geeks like you and I, yes you're right! Regular people don't care and they certainly don't open up new lines on their accts just to get the latest and greatest handset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you really just post the same article in 2 threads... you missed Texas..

 

Sent from your Galaxy Nexus 6

 

 

Edit: ahhh crap I can edit... hey its good to be in the top 2 LTE markets tho

Edited by danielholt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you really just post the same article in 2 threads... you missed Texas..

 

Just keeping the locals informed.

Texas? Eww. Let 'em fend for themselves. ;)

 

Mav. VERY :cool:

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Nexus 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...