Jump to content

SITE UPGRADE WARNING


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, chamb said:

Clinking on a existing thread to see  a new comment is sometimes slow.  Might take 10 seconds to get a response.

This issue started for me over a week ago.

Same here, generally navigating between pages seems fine to at least usable whenever whatever is going on is in play, but clicking on a thread to view it is when suddenly the site response just hangs for several seconds (in my experience anywhere from 10 to even as much as 20-25 seconds before the thread page will finally load).

To be specific, these days I'm usually clicking the icon to go to the next unread post in the thread - I have no tested to see if the same behavior exhibits itself if you just click in the thread link normally or if there's any differential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I click on the last time stamp of the person who just left a comment/post... it takes forever.   It's now quicker to open General then scroll down to 'Site Upgrade Warning" then go to last page and find the last comment.     It's a pain now to navigate.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, S4GRU said:

It's working fine for me right now at the moment.  Strange.

Robert

 

Robert - I can only speak for myself, but for anything I've described, its been intermittent, not a consistent 'every-time-I-access' thing.   Right now I'm experiencing zero issues either.  And I haven't seen any error response pages on my end in at least 2 days if not 3.  But the delayed load on threads has definitely still been happening at times the past 24 hours or so.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, PythonFanPA said:

 

Robert - I can only speak for myself, but for anything I've described, its been intermittent, not a consistent 'every-time-I-access' thing.   Right now I'm experiencing zero issues either.  And I haven't seen any error response pages on my end in at least 2 days if not 3.  But the delayed load on threads has definitely still been happening at times the past 24 hours or so.

Thanks for the report.  I've had all the problems everyone else has had.  Believe me, I know.  I have had more than a dozen emails and messages and this very thread reporting it.  My post response is just speaking about the problem from this morning must be gone since it seemed fine at the moment I checked  :sunny:.

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Just took me 10 seconds to get any action after I clicked on PythonFanPa's post above this post.

Normally when I have this issue, it is only the first thing I try to display when I enter the site after clicking on unread posts at the top.

Kind of acts like things are in a "sleep mode" and it takes 10 seconds to wake things up.  After it displays the first item, generally any following requests are responded to in a normal matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only browse with Tapatalk, but whatever Robert did last week fixed the speed issues that I was having.

For people having issues, does Developer Tools show anything? Anything in the console, or any specific request that's hanging? That might be useful to help figure out the cause.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ingenium said:

I only browse with Tapatalk, but whatever Robert did last week fixed the speed issues that I was having.

For people having issues, does Developer Tools show anything? Anything in the console, or any specific request that's hanging? That might be useful to help figure out the cause.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 

I tried doing that in chrome last night on my desktop and of course everything loaded perfect when I was looking for the culprit. I'll try again tonight when I get home from work, funny when you're looking for the problem you can't find it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah.. something is still out of whack.... if I try to "click" right on the timestamp "12 minutes ago" by BlueAngel, of the last person who made a response, it still takes a very long time to respond.   The bottom of my screen says: Waiting on S4GRU...    (see below)

image.png.c4315289b7560fa830476e93515fec57.pngimage.png.185ed9aeb9f8bca729d4a99faca442fa.png  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Encountered (and this time captured) an error for the first time in a few weeks - see attached, in case it helps in any way..
2035201980_S4GRU504erroron030319at0315pmEDT.thumb.JPG.e019a41835dfc7faf9cac72812407612.JPG
It's been awhile since I've encountered any errors like that

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...