Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Dying Embers Thread


SeanK_

Recommended Posts

I loved my Galaxy Note 2, still possible the best device I've ever used.  I hope that Samsung investigates this and finds a root cause, however, I'm guessing that will never be released publicly.

 

If not for my hatred of TouchWiz, I would have bought one of these when my MXPE was destroyed in late August

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now what to do with all the accessories I bought for this thing? More trash and what the heck is Samsung doing with all these phones? They going to scrape them or are they just going in a landfill?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Title for this thread should now be "Samsung Galaxy Note 7 - R.I.P."

 

Sent from my SM-N930P2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now what to do with all the accessories I bought for this thing? More trash and what the heck is Samsung doing with all these phones? They going to scrape them or are they just going in a landfill?

Sprint previously took accessories back if you bought them from Sprint.

 

Sent from my SM-N930P2 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now what to do with all the accessories I bought for this thing? More trash and what the heck is Samsung doing with all these phones? They going to scrape them or are they just going in a landfill?

T-Mobile announced that any accessories purchased from them could be returned with the phone.  I would expect all carrier to exchange accessories purchased from them.  Stuff purchased 3rd party, reach out to the seller/manufacturer.  Once you select a new device, I'd think they'd want to keep a customer and help you out.

 

Hopefully Samsung recycles as much of the REE as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile announced that any accessories purchased from them could be returned with the phone.  I would expect all carrier to exchange accessories purchased from them.  Stuff purchased 3rd party, reach out to the seller/manufacturer.  Once you select a new device, I'd think they'd want to keep a customer and help you out.

 

Hopefully Samsung recycles as much of the REE as possible.

Of course I bought from MobileFun, BestBuy and mostly Amazon (Spigen Cases) and dbrand.

 

I might keep the Samsung Wireless Charger and keep it as a stand for my phone at my desk.

 

Guess I reach out and see when I get back to my state.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course I bought from MobileFun, BestBuy and mostly Amazon (Spigen Cases) and dbrand.

 

I might keep the Samsung Wireless Charger and keep it as a stand for my phone at my desk.

 

Guess I reach out and see when I get back to my state.

I read on Android Central that Amazon was refunding this person their purchase.

 

http://forums.androidcentral.com/showthread.php?t=733890

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course I bought from MobileFun, BestBuy and mostly Amazon (Spigen Cases) and dbrand.

 

I might keep the Samsung Wireless Charger and keep it as a stand for my phone at my desk.

 

Guess I reach out and see when I get back to my state.

Just lovely travelling with these. Banned except when off and not charging by the FAA.

 

Sent from my SM-N930P2 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just lovely travelling with these. Banned except when off and not charging by the FAA.

 

Sent from my SM-N930P2 using Tapatalk

Good thing I went back to my Nexus 6P then.

 

 

Saw this on imgur and laughed pretty hard!

 

1zLmlmC.gif

Edited by SeanK_
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just lovely travelling with these. Banned except when off and not charging by the FAA.

 

Seriously, travel with a backup handset.  If you rely on a mobile phone as an additional appendage like so many people do these days, you always should have a usable backup handset.  If not, you are not living right.  Even setting aside the WiMAX capable HTC EVO, I have six available smartphones, all LTE capable.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So does anyone think due to the recent events the Note 5 might get some better support and a quicker update to 7.0? After all it is the only Note on the market as of now.

 

No.  Samsung wants to sell new handsets, not divert attention to old handsets.  Samsung will double down on promoting the Galaxy S7 series.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's hope not lol.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

Why?  Samsung Galaxy S7 series handsets are not fire prone, are not part of the recall.  The Galaxy S7 edge now is Samsung's North American flagship and a reasonable Galaxy Note 7 substitute.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Samsung Galaxy S7 series handsets are not fire prone, are not part of the recall. The Galaxy S7 edge now is Samsung's North American flagship and a reasonable Galaxy Note 7 substitute.

 

AJ

Yeah but it's not a Note lol, which from having owned both the S7 and my current Note 5, the Note 5 is superior. S7 is a laggy mess unlike the Note 5 aside from benchmarks you would think the Note 5 is the newer device.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but it's not a Note lol, which from having owned both the S7 and my current Note 5, the Note 5 is superior. S7 is a laggy mess unlike the Note 5 aside from benchmarks you would think the Note 5 is the newer device.

 

Placebo effect.  Or some other variables.

 

The Galaxy S7 edge and Galaxy Note 7 have the same processor, same RAM, etc.  The Galaxy S7 edge even has a larger capacity battery -- and one that does not explode so often.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Placebo effect. Or some other variables.

 

The Galaxy S7 edge and Galaxy Note 7 have the same processor, same RAM, etc. The Galaxy S7 edge even has a larger capacity battery -- and one that does not explode so often.

 

AJ

I know this but this Note 5 doesn't drop frames like the 7 series does, it's always smooth. S7 would lag doing basic things without any apps installed, then again the Note 5 has a 8 core processor vs a quad core that may have something to do with it I don't know.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Samsung wants to hold onto their market share. They're offering $100 bill credit if you trade in your Galaxy Note 7 for another Samsung device.

 

http://www.theverge.com/2016/10/13/13267674/samsung-note-7-refund-exchange-official

Is it worth to do that though. Hmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is. I have had nothing but a great experience with my GS7. The Edge is very popular as well.

I don't know if I want the S7 Edge or get the V20 or continue using what I'm using now which is the Nexus 6P which the battery life sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just in: "Every person with a Note 7 is upgrade eligible!": https://www.reddit.com/r/Sprint/comments/57ctu1/every_person_with_a_note_7_is_upgrade_eligible/

 

Sprint has flipped the "Eligible for Upgrade" switch for all customers with Note7 Devices on their account.  Both mine and my wife's show as upgrade eligible.  Now we have to figure out what we are going to do.  We really love our Note 7's and only ever slow charge them.  I guess we will return and go back to our MXPE's.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...