Jump to content

Sprint not participating in the 600 MHz auction (report)


Rawvega

Recommended Posts

 

I think John should check himself because DT isn't exactly throwing cash his way for the 600 MHz spectrum auction. Sprint doesn't really need it, no matter how many arm chair CEO's in here we have that really wouldn't know propagation if it fell on there heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dang...well Marcelo. It's now time to show out with all this spectrum Sprint has.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

excitement for densification just went to 11.

Well, Sprint is really banking on the densification plan, especially for the long-term now.  As they won't have any additional low band spectrum to roll out.

 

EDIT: I don't like the fact that their competition will now get more for themselves.  I personally believe it's going to hurt Sprint more than benefit them if they sit it out, similar to how T-Mobile became a force after merging with MetroPCS for their spectrum assets.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's official, Sprint will not be participating in the 600MHz auction.

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-26/sprint-won-t-join-2016-airwave-auction-saying-network-is-ample

I still think they are bluffing unless they have other plans with another entity that we don't know about yet.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think they are bluffing unless they have other plans with another entity that we don't know about yet.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

By the time this action actually transpires, Sprint and T-Mobile may have already merged.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I will get a lot of flack for this, but I'm actually happy they are not. I just don't see the cost/benefit of a small 600mhz chunk that won't be usable for nearly 5 years.

 

Densify the hell out of B41 now, and concentrate on efforts to do CDMA shutdown/refarm as soon as possible.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope this is a bluff because Marcelo is out of his mind if he thinks Sprint has the spectrum to compete indoors and outdoors.  Now I am feeling way less confident on his Next Generation Plan to bring the network up to par to compete with the other 3 carriers because indoor coverage will still suffer tremendously.

 

I know I will get a lot of flack for this, but I'm actually happy they are not. I just don't see the cost/benefit of a small 600mhz chunk that won't be usable for nearly 5 years.

Densify the hell out of B41 now, and concentrate on efforts to do CDMA shutdown/refarm as soon as possible.

 

How do you know the 600 MHz spectrum will just be a small chunk?  I still think its too short term thinking.  I don't see why Masa wouldn't approve of funding to get Sprint to participate in the auction.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope this is a bluff because Marcelo is out of his mind if he thinks Sprint has the spectrum to compete indoors and outdoors.  Now I am feeling way less confident on his Next Generation Plan to bring the network up to par to compete with the other 3 carriers because indoor coverage will still suffer tremendously.

 

 

 

How do you know the 600 MHz spectrum will just be a small chunk?  I still think its too short term thinking.  I don't see why Masa wouldn't approve of funding to get Sprint to participate in the auction.

FCC reserved 30Mhz for the smaller carriers..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think John should check himself because DT isn't exactly throwing cash his way for the 600 MHz spectrum auction. Sprint doesn't really need it, no matter how many arm chair CEO's in here we have that really wouldn't know propagation if it fell on there heads.

Even though there is a strong history of reporting about DT not funding T-Mobile, along with DT itself making various statements which support that, I think DT will send some funds over to T-Mobile for this auction as an addition to what T-Mobile is getting funds from lending groups.

 

Considering T-Mobile's growth, DT is enjoying reaping the benefits and knowing that they will make out very well once they do decide to sell T-Mobile. Funding T-Mobile for this auction will further help to ensure that.

 

Regarding Sprint, I think that dropping out of the auction is a huge mistake, unless they are pretty confident they'll be able to acquire T-Mobile in the future, along with the spectrum T-Mobile now very likely will get from this. That being likely at least 15x15 nationwide 600mhz, possibly even 20x20 or more, depending on costs and competition. If T-Mobile gets that much, they could very well begin to beat Verizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FCC reserved 30Mhz for the smaller carriers..

 

I know its 30 MHz but that is still at least good enough for a 5x5 or 10x10 block.  Btw just because only 30 MHz is reserved doesn't mean Sprint/Tmobile would not be able to bid on the remaining 5x5 blocks of 600 MHz spectrum.  

 

Remember the FCC imposed rules that a carrier cannot have more than 45 MHz of <1 GHz spectrum in any particular market or something like that. In some cases if the total amount of 600 MHz available for auctions is 84 MHz, chances are Verizon/AT&T will only be able to buy a 5x5 block in that market since they own a ton of 700 MHz and 850 MHz spectrum and Sprint/Tmobile is free to bid on the remaining blocks in that region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't say I'm surprised by this news. Sprint needs its cash now to roll out band 41 and a more dense network. Bad timing really for Sprint. If things were different, I'd bet they would plan to participate.

 

I would much rather delay a little part of the NGN plan to obtain the 600 MHz now than to go press full speed with the NGN plan.  Again short term thinking is what continues to plague Sprint.  Now it begs the question if future Sprint phones will be more incompatible with the rest of the other carriers just like it does with AWS with no 600 MHz LTE band support.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know its 30 MHz but that is still at least good enough for a 5x5 or 10x10 block.  Btw just because only 30 MHz is reserved doesn't mean Sprint/Tmobile would not be able to bid on the remaining 5x5 blocks of 600 MHz spectrum.  

 

Remember the FCC imposed rules that a carrier cannot have more than 45 MHz of <1 GHz spectrum in any particular market or something like that. In some cases if the total amount of 600 MHz available for auctions is 84 MHz, chances are Verizon/AT&T will only be able to buy a 5x5 block in that market since they own a ton of 700 MHz and 850 MHz spectrum and Sprint/Tmobile is free to bid on the remaining blocks in that region.

Again, Id rather they spend the 3 or 4 billion dollars(most likely alot more), not even including deployment cost densifying B41. I don't know if its because I live in a very dense market, but i do not see 3G (unless super deep indoors or basement, where even verizon LTE cannot get through) is the reason I have this mindset.

 

Densifying B41 is a thousand times more forward thinking than a limited 600Mhz spectrum, that will require years and years to deploy and receive device support. If deployment of 600Mhz were doable within a year or maybe 2 it would be an ok stop gap. But even the most rural areas will continue to grow its data needs and I just don't see 10x10 (forget about 5x5) being a good long term solution for data needs especially in exchange for Band 41 deployment. 

 

If Sprint had Verizon money, id do it just to screw the competition, but I think its safe to say they do not. Being on B41 90% of time here says alot, but I think Sprint should shoot to achieve this and more in most markets to quell any need for other spectrum for a long time.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have liked Sprint bidding, if for no other reason than to drive the prices up for the others. It is going to be interesting to see if Verizon is out as well, they've also made rumblings about not participating. VZ might be better served with Dish spectrum. They have ample low band but need to supplement their middle band holdings.

 

I get the counter arguments that Sprint needs to fund NGN but low band is such a finite resource. It's nice Sprint has a national band for low band LTE with band 26 but it would have been nice to supplement that in certain markets that are strong for Sprint.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, Id rather they spend the 3 or 4 billion dollars(most likely more), not even including deployment cost  densifying B41. I don't know if its because I live in a very dense market, but i do not see 3G (unless super deep indoors or basement, where even verizon LTE cannot get through) is the reason I have this mindset.

 

Densifying B41 is a thousand times more forward thinking than a limited 600Mhz spectrum, that will require years and years to deploy and receive device support. If deployment of 600Mhz were doable within a year or maybe 2 it would be an ok stop gap. But even the most rural areas will continue to grow its data needs and I just don't see 10x10 (forget about 5x5) being a good long term solution for data needs especially in exchange for Band 41 deployment. 

 

Unless you think Sprint is hanging by a limb on cash, why can't have separate buckets for financing on spectrum auction bidding and they already have separate financing from the OEMs for the NGN network?  While the OEMs, TV stations do its thing after the 600 MHz auction, focus funds back on the NGN.  We have always said on this site that Sprint can do and have done things in parallel (LTE 800, LTE 1900 and LTE 2500 at the same time) and not serially so why not now?  BTW NYC is going to be a hell of a lot harder to cover even if you rely on 2.5 GHz small cells because that is going to take years and years to develop.  Right now Sprint is still focusing on deploying NV on all of its macro cells so you are going to be waiting on those small cells for a long time.  

 

Actually according to Ericcson the bottleneck for 600 MHz deployment will not be on the equipment manufacturers to produce equipment since they can do it quickly but rather the TV stations vacating the spectrum.  Actual deployment of 600 MHz will be rather quick once TV stations vacate the spectrum and will be slowly rolled out as soon as the TV network clears it which can vary.  It doesn't have to be an all or nothing deployment nationwide.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/special-reports/ericsson-cto-laxdal-dishes-virtualization-network-slicing-and-600-mhz

 

 FWT: How quickly could you provide the equipment?

Laxdal: We'll have equipment for 600 very quickly. It's very easy for us today. We've got a 700 MHz radio, so introducing it in a 600 MHz radio is going to be very straightforward. The challenge is going to be clearing the spectrum. 600 MHz spectrum with broadcasters in it today will have to go through a clearing process, which typically could take a year and a half to two years for an operator to fully clear it. In the meantime, that doesn't mean they can't be deploying networks but they would need a clear network to be able to launch the network. So I'd say the long pole in 600 MHz will be clearing the 600 MHz spectrum and then getting the device on 600, and we will make sure the radios are available in good time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you think Sprint is hanging by a limb on cash, why can't have separate buckets for financing on spectrum auction bidding and they already have separate financing from the OEMs for the NGN network?  While the OEMs, TV stations do its thing after the 600 MHz auction, focus funds back on the NGN.  We have always said on this site that Sprint can do things in parallel (LTE 800, LTE 1900 and LTE 2500 at the same time) and not serially so why not now?  BTW NYC is going to be a hell of a lot harder to cover even if you rely on 2.5 GHz small cells because that

 

Actually according to Ericcson the bottleneck for 600 MHz deployment will not be on the equipment manufacturers to produce equipment since they can do it quickly but rather the TV stations vacating the spectrum.  Actual deployment of 600 MHz will be rather quick once TV stations vacate the spectrum and will be slowly rolled out as soon as the network clears it.  It doesn't have to be an all or nothing deployment nationwide.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/special-reports/ericsson-cto-laxdal-dishes-virtualization-network-slicing-and-600-mhz

That was my point, NYC is already covered super well with B41, all we need is more capacity. B41 in its current form already gets indoors pretty well without beamforming or even higher order MIMO. Also, as has been stated multiple times, 600Mhz best case scenario, the user will not experience any of it until nearly 2020 at best.

 

Don't get me started on Ericsson/Sprint deployment track record...

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was my point, NYC is already covered super well with B41, all we need is more capacity. B41 in its current form already gets indoors pretty well without beamforming or even higher order MIMO. Also, as has been stated multiple times, 600Mhz best case scenario, the user will not experience any 600Mhz until nearly 2020 at best.

 

Try coming out to Los Angeles and then say the same thing.  Its easy to say that when a market is urban and things are very well tight together.  But in LA the market is so spread out that low band spectrum makes a huge difference.  

 

I just don't understand the thinking that if Sprint participated in 600 MHz auction that NGN efforts would go to a complete halt.  Its like the same mindset thinking back when NV was beginning to deploy that people were clamoring...just throw money at it and then NV deployment progress would suddenly rise 1000%.  That is not how it works. There are only a finite amount of network deployment staff out there that are pretty much shared between all the major carriers so throwing a ton of money isn't going to be much help and not to mention the red tape especially when all the other carriers are currently going full speed on their own LTE network deployments.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Or, more simply, have a physical SIM that I can just move from one device to another.  Problem [already] solved.  Carrier doesn't have to be involved at any point in the process. I'll be among many (I'm sure) who will be glad to know if you see it.  Here in the DC area, Dish hasn't really done much yet.  I think I've seen some Dish gear around Richmond, but nothing here. - Trip
    • I like VICE.  They actually report on news no one else is willing to report. A lot of the places they go no sane person would want to be there.  They put their life on the line in many cases to get a story. From stories about the avocado wars in Mexico, being in the front lines against ISIS and Ukraine, to being embedded with terrorist organizations.   FAA might have some conspiracy 5G nut on their team or something.  At work ever year we have some one come in and say "hey, can you turn off the WIFI in my room? I don't want its radiation".  It doesn't make sense and their reasoning is always uneducated conspiracy. I can see someone coming into my office and acting crazy over C band disregarding everything else.
    • I think on esims it depends on how they implement it. If you can freely activate them on one phone while having it loaded on many that would be great.   I will let you know when I see Boost Mobile native 5g live here. So far no sign of even the plmn being active which I figure will be my first indicator. I look at changing networks with the TNX Sim and seem to get a full list of all carriers and their alternate plmns.
    • This is a result of the change I mentioned above, sparked by @PedroDaGr8 trying to log AT&T cells with a non-AT&T SIM that was reporting "out of service" but still capturing cell info. For the moment (subject to change as I keep testing and getting feedback), the "Connecting to" prefix will disappear when you connect in a scenario like that. I may adjust it to show a special prefix like "Limited LTE" or "No Data LTE" to make it more clear what is going on, but I also need to make sure that's only appearing at the proper times. When you were seeing just "LTE" in your screenshots, was there anything unusual about your connection? I see the app indicated you couldn't make calls; could you transfer data? Can you send a diagnostic report next time you see that?   I'm seeing this more frequently, unfortunately -- it has something to do with Android's power saving efforts I believe. Was the app in the foreground when it happened? When the screen updates, the notification and home screen widget are also updated -- but as seen with the widget for the past couple of years, Android doesn't always execute the update. I'm constantly trying to find ways around these limitations, since the app is useless if it's displaying stale data.
    • Bleh, hope not.  The eSIM is a huge step backwards to the bad old days and I have no desire to encourage their use. But in any event, maybe I should get Boost service, then, if people are already seeing it.  I can use it for AT&T until Dish native gear goes live in this area.  Have to ponder that a bit. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...