Jump to content

Coverage Mapping Tools


mhammett
 Share

Recommended Posts

RootMetrics is okay but they measure 1x signal and ever since the single path devices came out, they've been reading Sprint device signals as -120dbm or something like that because the 1x side isn't active.

 

OpenSignal's heat map is poor in general.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RootMetrics is okay but they measure 1x signal and ever since the single path devices came out, they've been reading Sprint device signals as -120dbm or something like that because the 1x side isn't active.

 

OpenSignal's heat map is poor in general.

I let RootMetics run accidentally and mapped a large chunk of my town that now shows -120dB for call performance and LTE as the best technology.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have said, rootmetrics still hasn't updated their app to support sprint triband devices, and it's been over a year. They don't seem interested in supporting their app.

 

Sensorly seems to be the best, although they do have a few problems with their mapping. I.e. Sprint LTE mapped in Oklahoma where there is none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have said, rootmetrics still hasn't updated their app to support sprint triband devices, and it's been over a year. They don't seem interested in supporting their app.

 

Sensorly seems to be the best, although they do have a few problems with their mapping. I.e. Sprint LTE mapped in Oklahoma where there is none.

Or that the Sprint maps in NYC aren't very accurate anymore. The map should be way darker in many areas but that simply isn't the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had the exact same issue up here in Washington. All of a sudden it won't map LTE anymore.

I hope they fix it soon Sprint has been very busy firing up LTE 800 and there are tons of new areas to map here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Refuses to map? That's a new one. They do have a support thread here on the forums. Not sure the last time they checked it though.

Refuses, failed to perform an action, "Sensorly refuses to map."   :P

 

On the same note I've emailed them many times without a response, so now I refuse to use Sensorly.  :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Refuses, failed to perform an action, "Sensorly refuses to map."   :P

 

On the same note I've emailed them many times without a response, so now I refuse to use Sensorly.  :angry:

When is the last time you tried Sensorly? I had issues before and removed it about 6-7 months ago, but I decided to try it again and it works fine now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When is the last time you tried Sensorly? I had issues before and removed it about 6-7 months ago, but I decided to try it again and it works fine now.

I actually tried to use it today and still nada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My Sensorly still won't map nor will it upload any of the speed tests I run. It's incredibly frustrating.

 

It looks like everything is working as it should, but it never shows up. I wonder if the developer has given up on the product?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

The guys over at Cellmapper are willing to add in band information, but I don't think they're in the US, so I don't think they have the ability to test this themselves. They were wondering if we could provide how to map out the frequencies. Do we have a tried and true sector ID (or other information) to band method?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to know this too because I have done a significant amount of mapping on Cellmapper on my Nexus 5 (new member from HoFo and T4GRU). SignalCheck Pro displays the band perfectly. If the guys over at Cellmapper had a way to distinguish B26 from B25 and B41, maybe we could see just how far B41 goes (lots of B41 holes in Lansing MI).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

00,01,02 band 25 

03 split between second carrier Samsung and  first carrier

04,05 second carrier Samsung band 25

09,0A,0B second carrier band 25

0F,10,11 band 26

19,1A,1B band 26

 

 

 

band 41 

GCI 3rd is number from the left is "odd" if(GCI && 0x00100000){}//band 41 

00,01,02 First carrier

03,04,05 Second carrier

31,32,33 First carrier

39,3A,3B Second carrier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just figured out this is a waste of time. US Mobile and Verizon lock the eSim to the emei while T-Mobile only uses it to see that you have a capable phone, like Red Pocket does with physical sims (although RP does keep track of what phone you are using it on with the emei.)  So @Trip was right in this case on liking physical sims.
    • Verizon has a reputation for being frugal with MVNOs. After looking around, I also decided US Mobile was my best option. People have gotten C band on it.  Hoping for esim for my S21 Ultra.  No luck so far.  Red Pocket does not claim Verizon 5g, although they say Soon!(TM).  I do see some 5g with it. Typically MVNOs are deprioritized, thus I am reluctant to claim truly getting top speeds with one.
    • Did some exploring yesterday/last night and didn't find a shred of C-Band, including with my brand new US Mobile SIM. Did find 4CA CBRS but the site seemed backhaul constrained; both that plus 15x15 B2 and band-locked 2/66 got me 190 Mbps or so.
    • Did some more exploring yesterday/last night and I think I spotted some LAA downtown but didn't get a chance to confirm before it went away in favor of mmW, which also went away pretty quickly. Also saw another n66 site, as well as an n2 site, making AT&T the second carrier to run n2 DSS within a few miles of me. I think at this point they won't be able to advertise anything flashy, but due to the sheer amount of CA they're throwing at customers here they can keep their network at 50+ Mbps until they can deploy both 3.45 and 3.7, and that's probably enough.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...