Jump to content

HTC One M9 Rumor Thread


Ascertion

Recommended Posts

I found some pictures of the HTC One M9 or what they think it's going to look like. It looks pretty legit and I think it's beautiful [emoji7]

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/b10wacze6ps0zua/Photo%20Feb%2005%2C%2012%2004%2005%20AM.jpg?dl=0

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/05vqvm22gjmzpbf/Photo%20Feb%2006%2C%203%2059%2037%20AM.png?dl=0

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/fjj709qhd4o4lqf/Photo%20Feb%2004%2C%2010%2038%2040%20PM.jpg?dl=0

 

 

Sent from my shiny Space Grey iPhone 6 using Tapatalk 3.2.1

Meh, I like the this version better http://www.androidcentral.com/htc-one-m9-leaked-image-offers-peek-two-new-htc-flagships

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are they doing away with the front facing speakers? or is it just hard to tell where they are from those renders? front facing speakers would be one of the main reasons i would get an HTC phone..... that and if they do a max thats close to a 6" screen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

are they doing away with the front facing speakers? or is it just hard to tell where they are from those renders? front facing speakers would be one of the main reasons i would get an HTC phone..... that and if they do a max thats close to a 6" screen.

There's no way they're removing the boomsound speakers. They're likely reducing their size, though.

 

Sent from my M8

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Those photos don't contradict what we're seeing in these images at all. In fact, they look pretty much the same. We still haven't seemed what the confirmed front of the device looks like. the only front photos we've seen are of the decoy device which had the M8 front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are they doing away with the front facing speakers? or is it just hard to tell where they are from those renders? front facing speakers would be one of the main reasons i would get an HTC phone..... that and if they do a max thats close to a 6" screen.

 

The boomsound speakers are there. they simply did what they did with the Nexus 9 and moved them toward the edge of the screen and instead of making a giant grill, they opted for small slits at either end of the screen. As a result HTC is not able to make the whole front of the phone a single glass panel much like the iPhone is. That means phone will feel even more high quality than before.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those photos don't contradict what we're seeing in these images at all. In fact, they look pretty much the same. We still haven't seemed what the confirmed front of the device looks like. the only front photos we've seen are of the decoy device which had the M8 front.

True, but too me it doesn't look like it would fit the design that I posted to. Front is more sleek then back. We'll see when its announced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time distinguishing the M7, M8 and new supposed M9. It's like the GS3, GS4 and GS5. Come on, HTC. Move the goal posts a little further in design.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time distinguishing the M7, M8 and new supposed M9. It's like the GS3, GS4 and GS5. Come on, HTC. Move the goal posts a little further in design.

 

Lol then you must not be paying attention Robert ;)  I can tell them apart instantly. You can't compare that to the Galaxy S3-5, those were more like iPhones 4-5S  :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have a hard time distinguishing the M7, M8 and new supposed M9. It's like the GS3, GS4 and GS5. Come on, HTC. Move the goal posts a little further in design.

Hey but at least htc had a kick ass design to begin with where as samsung's design language is just boring.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time distinguishing the M7, M8 and new supposed M9. It's like the GS3, GS4 and GS5. Come on, HTC. Move the goal posts a little further in design.

 

No, no, no, Robert, the visible difference between the M7 and M8 is huge.

 

It is like the massive difference between the upright and reclined positions on an airliner coach seat.  Upright, uncomfortable.  Reclined, comfortable.  Upright during landing, live.  Reclined during landing, die.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.phonearena.com/news/More-tiny-details-about-the-HTC-One-M9-tipped-camera-aperture-CPU-clock-speed_id66304

 

 

Camera sensor may not be a sony exmor after all, as it turns out it may be a toshiba sensor instead which isn't exactly a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very confused, by these leaks that say these are the rendered official versions when it goes against the other sources that claim that the one m8 looking units are just demos and not the official release design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very confused, by these leaks that say these are the rendered official versions when it goes against the other sources that claim that the one m8 looking units are just demos and not the official release design.

Evleaks has had the best Design leak so far but most of others point to it looking almost exactly like an M8. Samsung appears to be changing their design a bit so we'll see how they really look on March 1st.

 

Sent from my M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evleaks has had the best Design leak so far but most of others point to it looking almost exactly like an M8. Samsung appears to be changing their design a bit so we'll see how they really look on March 1st.

Sent from my M8

I'm all for being surprised in regard to design so if we haven't seen it yet I'm good with that! I just hope that the Snapdragon 810 doesn't have issues as the Korean market G flex 2 seems to have and performance and fluidity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very confused, by these leaks that say these are the rendered official versions when it goes against the other sources that claim that the one m8 looking units are just demos and not the official release design.

Well htc did a hell of a job hiding what the m7 looked like because I don't think anyone had any idea until it was officially revealed. The m8 on the other hand leaked horribly so I really believe that htc changed things around this year to prevent leaks as much as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well htc did a hell of a job hiding what the m7 looked like because I don't think anyone had any idea until it was officially revealed. The m8 on the other hand leaked horribly so I really believe that htc changed things around this year to prevent leaks as much as possible.

I hope you're right.  There's rumors going around that the M9 will look identicle to the M8.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope you're right.  There's rumors going around that the M9 will look identicle to the M8.  

With all the buzz and hoopla htc been creating over the last few weeks, if the m9 turns out to be damn near identical to the m8 then they would definitely be shooting themselves in the foot big time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very confused, by these leaks that say these are the rendered official versions when it goes against the other sources that claim that the one m8 looking units are just demos and not the official release design.

 

I wouldn't look too much into it. These "official" renders are pulled from a german website and are probably just placeholder images.

 

If you go to Spigen's website, they have a VERY different representation of what the M9 looks like in their product pre-order pages.

 

http://www.spigen.com/brands/htc/htc-one-m9.html

 

So I've officially stopped looking into the design of the M9 and I'm just gonna patiently wait for Sunday morning.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't look too much into it. These "official" renders are pulled from a german website and are probably just placeholder images.

 

If you go to Spigen's website, they have a VERY different representation of what the M9 looks like in their product pre-order pages.

 

http://www.spigen.com/brands/htc/htc-one-m9.html

 

So I've officially stopped looking into the design of the M9 and I'm just gonna patiently wait for Sunday morning.

 

I saw that yesterday, and those are the renderings I liked the most, so I'll keep my fingers crossed.  Although I'm not up for a replacement phone until November anyway.  :( 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...