Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I'm glad Marcelo put his foot down on Charter's comments on not wanting to buy Sprint, when in reality that was never on the table..

 

http://www.barrons.com/articles/sprint-ceo-claure-conversations-with-several-parties-soon-going-to-make-decisions-1501597131

 

"Claure said a couple of times he has "no idea why Charter said we are not interested in buying Sprint,” expressing surprise — "that caught us off guard” as Sprint "never pitched let’s sell ourselves to Charter.” He later returned to the matter, saying it was “irresponsible” on Charter’s part, adding "there was never an offer to Charter, let’s take that away; I have no idea what offer they are refusing."

“It’s kind of irresponsible to refuse an offer which you have no idea what it is."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish we could get more color on the CapEx spending, but as we all have noticed there has been a surge in permitted and COMPLETED MM B41 work in many markets. So hopefully we are starting to see a continuing investment trend.

Perhaps there's a lot more going on than we know and Sprint is leveraging a cost structure that doesn't fit the traditional model....

 

4CA is a software push.

HPUE also required some tinkering (not sure if hardware too) and new capable devices.

 

Neither of these things require a bunch of money to do.

 

Mini Macros are cheap vs Macro builds. Magic Boxes are also cheap and don't require lengthy permitting.

 

Unless I missed it, "8T8R" didn't come up on the call. Are 8T8R Macro builds on hold in favor of Mini Macros?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps there's a lot more going on than we know and Sprint is leveraging a cost structure that doesn't fit the traditional model....

4CA is a software push.

HPUE also required some tinkering (not sure if hardware too) and new capable devices.

Neither of these things require a bunch of money to do.

Mini Macros are cheap vs Macro builds. Magic Boxes are also cheap and don't require lengthy permitting.

Unless I missed it, "8T8R" didn't come up on the call. Are 8T8R Macro builds on hold in favor of Mini Macros?

No, they have been deploying 8t8r in some markets..

 

Also, Sprint stock killing it today so far. Market seems pretty confident.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Sprint stock may not hold up long (pardon the pun) since every time Masa/Softbank opens its mouth to spit out another merger rumor, and it is printed by the media, the stock goes back down for Sprint but increases for the other party. In todays' rumor,  it seems it is thinking of doing the Sprint/Dish route.  

 

Nikkei report

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Sprint stock may not hold up long (pardon the pun) since every time Masa/Softbank opens its mouth to spit out another merger rumor, and it is printed by the media, the stock goes back down for Sprint but increases for the other party. In todays' rumor,  it seems it is thinking of doing the Sprint/Dish route.  

 

Nikkei report

Its an article from the future...nice! LOL (you'd figure at this point most blogging/posting sites would support location based "time posted" tech)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, they have been deploying 8t8r in some markets..

Also, Sprint stock killing it today so far. Market seems pretty confident.

It's nice to see the fundamentals shoring up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Sprint stock may not hold up long (pardon the pun) since every time Masa/Softbank opens its mouth to spit out another merger rumor, and it is printed by the media, the stock goes back down for Sprint but increases for the other party. In todays' rumor, it seems it is thinking of doing the Sprint/Dish route.

 

Nikkei report

I like this one.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Sprint stock may not hold up long (pardon the pun) since every time Masa/Softbank opens its mouth to spit out another merger rumor, and it is printed by the media, the stock goes back down for Sprint but increases for the other party. In todays' rumor,  it seems it is thinking of doing the Sprint/Dish route.  

 

Nikkei report

Does Dish have access to Fiber? I think going the Dish route would be interesting, but would not accelerate the acquisition of backhaul.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Dish have access to Fiber? I think going the Dish route would be interesting, but would not accelerate the acquisition of backhaul.

I don't know if they have fiber but they have more spectrum including some lowband.

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if they have river but they have more spectrum including some lowband.

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

This is exactly why i like it. Of all the rumors i really like the idea of a third party injecting 10-20 billion for resell rights but this is a close second.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats to Sprint in getting its financial house in order. That being said, I am still in favor of T-Mobile and Sprint merging because of the tremendous fixed cost investment it takes to have a nationwide network. I hope that Softbank at some point or another invests in acquiring the 600Mhz spectrum from Dish, Comcast and some smaller companies and then lease it to Sprint. 7Mhz is not enough to compete with the other three.

The best thing I'm hoping for either is for Sprint to continue with billion dollar network investments, or to do that also while merging with T-Mobile and picking up Dish along the way. This would increase the 600mhz spectrum Dish has with T-Mobile, and bump up the minimum from 10x10 to 15x15, which considering many places T-Mobile already has 15x15, this would make those 20x20.

 

Having that much low-band spectrum would make T-Mobile's current spectrum allotment which already is great, even better, while also giving the combined companies a vast amount of spectrum they probably would never have an issue with having not enough spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Softbank invested 1 billion into OneWeb (thus owning half of it) and although the proposed merger with Intelsat collapsed last month, OneWeb plans on going forward with their satellite plans. Buying Dish may fall into play not only with the spectrum that Dish holds but also with OneWeb plans of bringing service to rural and unserved areas around the world.

Thus,

Grabbing Dish, a share deal with Charter/Comcast, buyout of T-Mobile, then a total buyout of Charter/Comcast. (not necessarily in that order) and this all falls nicely into the World Domination plans of Masa. muwhahahahahaha

 

 

 

Sorry about that, I was channeling him for a moment. lol

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Softbank invested 1 billion into OneWeb (thus owning half of it) and although the proposed merger with Intelsat collapsed last month, OneWeb plans on going forward with their satellite plans. Buying Dish may fall into play not only with the spectrum that Dish holds but also with OneWeb plans of bringing service to rural and unserved areas around the world.

Thus,

Grabbing Dish, a share deal with Charter/Comcast, buyout of T-Mobile, then a total buyout of Charter/Comcast. (not necessarily in that order) and this all falls nicely into the World Domination plans of Masa. muwhahahahahaha

 

 

 

Sorry about that, I was channeling him for a moment. lol

You forgot the part where a light shines down upon him, granting him full powers over the land and sea, where the light leads him to finding a magical staff, and a hat, and then guides him to pull a sword from a stone. With that in his grasps, he goes upon a conquest to take over the world. First stopping by at AT&T, then Verizon, then the FCC. From there, he combines all the national U.S. carriers into one. Then when he finally has all the U.S. wireless companies under his control, he makes plans for an announcement that everyone awaits anxiously for, wondering what it could be...

 

Then, he speaks... With one voice, he says "Twice the Price".

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Word in Japan is Son is now going after Dish. I like this idea as it will bring additional spectrum to the game.

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/01/dish-network-becomes-latest-telecom-stock-to-spike-on-report-softbank-may-buy-it.html

I like the idea too, but I'd like for it to be a Dish/Sprint/T-Mobile combination.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me too! But that would be difficult to get through FCC and Justice Department approvals.

The way I see it is that while it may be challenging, it isn't impossible, especially since the administration is pro-business and Donald Trump seems to like Masayoshi Son.

 

Now while I don't agree with how Masa has operated Sprint thus far, considering my disagreements with some of Softbank's business decisions, I like Masa's original thinking of Sprint and the plans he had when he was thinking big for Sprint in his wireless empire. Those are ambitions I certainly admire, and if Masa decided to take this on and not get discouraged, he'd have my full support along the way.

 

I think if Masa were to look at the one area he might have trouble with in the merger, which is total amount of spectrum, he could form a plan to take in presenting the government a strategy of selling off certain spectrum and helpful cooperation with other carriers in spectrum swaps.

 

I wrote about this not too long ago here on S4GRU, where I looked at Dish's 40mhz of AWS-4 Sprint could use as 20x20 spectrum. Then if Masa repurchased the AWS-3 spectrum Dish gave up in the tax situation after the auction, he could arrange a spectrum swap deal deal with AT&T for Sprint to have 20x20, while giving AT&T some PCS spectrum or AWS-1 spectrum from T-Mobile.

 

The last bit is deciding which of the two spectrum Sprint could more easily amount to having 20x20 of, PCS or AWS-1, possibly selling the other as part of a deal, if needbe. The best plan, imo, is to have three sets of 20x20 in the midband, then sell the remainder of the midband if necessary for the deal.

 

Considering Sprint's 120mhz of band41 Sprint could divide into half for 60mhz down, 60mhz up, basically equals the 60mhz down, 60mhz up in the combined midband. From there, Sprint could sell off their 800mhz spectrum and T-Mobile's 700mhz spectrum, and the remainder of 600mhz after provisioning 20x20 of it for nationwide use, leaving them a total of 140mhz downlink and 140mhz of uplink spectrum, granted if Sprint divided use of band41 evenly.

 

This scenario would have Sprint giving up alot of spectrum to satisfy regulators, while still having plenty for its own use between wireless, and of course for Dish digital entertainment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not add Apple as well?

Apple? They don't have anything that can be part of a service bundle package for one. Another thing is the immense conflict of interest involved between hardware sales at Sprint with Android devices.

 

Basically the same reasons for not including Apple as to those Magentans who use to strongly advocate for Google to buy T-Mobile. Both companies serve multiple carriers and a carrier ownership of one of them would be a massive monopoly.

 

Its much different in the case of Sprint, T-Mobile, and Dish, as both Sprint and T-Mobile could benefit from having Dish in the same way AT&T benefits from having DirecTv. The two carriers merging together also is something Masayoshi Son obviously wants too, so the three companies combined makes for a powerful competitor to AT&T with no serious conflict of interest.

 

One more thing, as I gave the example of earlier involving the combined company having plenty of spectrum they could divest while still having plenty of usable spectrum, it isn't completely a monopoly. Unlike the issues involving a hardware/software manufacturer like Apple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Masa says "I'll add everyone" MUHAHAHAHAHA

 

Ok I'll stop now.

:P

Well, despite my response to Mr.Nuke, I don't doubt Masa very likely would love to own Apple, though I doubt he'd even try to involve Sprint in it. Just too much conflict with Android device manufacturers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...