Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Thank the Good Lord above that this is a field test on COMMERICALLY DEPLOYED EQUIPMENT. Now I can only hope the CapEx ramps up in earnest so we can see this come over a far greater part of the network.

 

Also nice to see real progress on VoLTE. I'm hoping there's some sort of opt in this year. Finally Sprint management is talking good game on getting Sprint on a single network standard.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also nice to see real progress on VoLTE.

 

The VoLTE on the Galaxy s8 probably means nothing for Sprint. It's been included on unlocked devices for a while now for the sole purpose of being used on T-Mobile and Verizon. Doubt we see VoLTE on Sprint this year.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know the reason why Sprint is just now wanting to deploy B41 LTE using Config 2? Why did Sprint even deploy B41 LTE Config 3 in the first place? Especially with the extra downlink frame in Config 2, wouldnt it have made more sense to start with that in the beginning.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know the reason why Sprint is just now wanting to deploy B41 LTE using Config 2? Why did Sprint even deploy B41 LTE Config 3 in the first place? Especially with the extra downlink frame in Config 2, wouldnt it have made more sense to start with that in the beginning.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Probably because they were trying to find a good balance of download and upload speeds previously but after studying data patterns they realize that upload speeds aren't as much of a factor as they thought. People don't upload from their phone as much as they thought.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably because they were trying to find a good balance of download and upload speeds previously but after studying data patterns they realize that upload speeds aren't as much of a factor as they thought. People don't upload from their phone as much as they thought.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

 

Does anyone know the reason why Sprint is just now wanting to deploy B41 LTE using Config 2? Why did Sprint even deploy B41 LTE Config 3 in the first place? Especially with the extra downlink frame in Config 2, wouldnt it have made more sense to start with that in the beginning.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Also once 64QAM UL is added, they can use that spectrum even more efficiently with Config 2, while further still enhancing DL without using any additional spectrum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, let's see this deployed in all of Sprint's sites and no more 1x for data?

What happens for Sprint when Verizon shuts down its 2G CDMA 1X network by December 31, 2019?

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/verizon-to-shut-down-2g-cdma-1x-network-by-end-2019

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens for Sprint when Verizon shuts down its 2G CDMA 1X network by December 31, 2019?

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/verizon-to-shut-down-2g-cdma-1x-network-by-end-2019

Sprint has roaming deals with a ton of regionals but this also provides a sense of urgency with regard to VoLTE.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank the Good Lord above that this is a field test on COMMERICALLY DEPLOYED EQUIPMENT. Now I can only hope the CapEx ramps up in earnest so we can see this come over a far greater part of the network.

Also nice to see real progress on VoLTE. I'm hoping there's some sort of opt in this year. Finally Sprint management is talking good game on getting Sprint on a single network standard.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

VoLTE shouldn't be deployed until it's rock solid. Sprint has a great CDMA voice network, and it would be a mistake to launch VoLTE prematurely.

 

VoLTE should be opt-in at first.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens for Sprint when Verizon shuts down its 2G CDMA 1X network by December 31, 2019?

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/verizon-to-shut-down-2g-cdma-1x-network-by-end-2019

People still roam on V?? LOL  (I haven't roamed on V for about 2 years)

 

All joking aside, if by 2019 V roaming is still a thing, I think Sprint will have other issues to worry about.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People still roam on V?? LOL  (I haven't roamed on V for about 2 years)

 

All joking aside, if by 2019 V roaming is still a thing, I think Sprint will have other issues to worry about.

I roam on Verizon when I go toward the center of this building I work in.  :-)

 

If I'm by the window, I get great Sprint LTE coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People still roam on V?? LOL (I haven't roamed on V for about 2 years)

 

All joking aside, if by 2019 V roaming is still a thing, I think Sprint will have other issues to worry about.

I would think by that time Sprint should he able to stand in some form on their own. Who knows, volte roaming could come into play. But I do want Sprint to cut down on the roaming costs they are paying to Verizon.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I roam on Verizon when I go toward the center of this building I work in.  :-)

 

If I'm by the window, I get great Sprint LTE coverage.

I keep my Voice/Data roaming off entirely. When working in Downtown DC in certain buildings, I sometimes see 3 dots of coverage on my iPhone 7 and 1X. What does this mean in terms of Sprint coverage?

 

Why am I picking up the voice network and not the LTE network?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep my Voice/Data roaming off entirely. When working in Downtown DC in certain buildings, I sometimes see 3 dots of coverage on my iPhone 7 and 1X. What does this mean in terms of Sprint coverage?

 

Why am I picking up the voice network and not the LTE network?

Maybe they just have 3G coverage in that area.  There are a lot of areas where that can happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they just have 3G coverage in that area.  There are a lot of areas where that can happen.

If there was 3G coverage, wouldn't I see that indicated instead of 1X? I'm literally one block from The White House.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep my Voice/Data roaming off entirely. When working in Downtown DC in certain buildings, I sometimes see 3 dots of coverage on my iPhone 7 and 1X. What does this mean in terms of Sprint coverage?

 

Why am I picking up the voice network and not the LTE network?

Simply because 1x is alot more resilient and can travel further than 3G or LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the blackberry keyone(mercury) is coming to Sprint. 12664301fa06e3be845bb963758c38fd.jpg

Sent from my 2PYB2 using Tapatalk

I'll bet it's BYOD. I just don't see Sprint taking on inventory for a device that has 0% Market Share:

 

http://mashable.com/2017/02/15/blackberry-gartner-report/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simply because 1x is alot more resilient and can travel further than 3G or LTE.

How's that?

 

Why am I seeing 3 Dots for voice coverage? Is this on Sprint's 800 MHz voice network? Why wouldn't I get 800 MHz LTE at this location?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the blackberry keyone(mercury) is coming to Sprint.

12664301fa06e3be845bb963758c38fd.jpg

 

Sent from my 2PYB2 using Tapatalk

I wouldn't be surprised if this device would be sold to Sprint Business customers only but also having the option of purchasing it unlocked and bringing it to Sprint for non-business accounts.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised if this device would be sold to Sprint Business customers only but also having the option of purchasing it unlocked and bringing it to Sprint for non-business accounts.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

that wouldn't be a bad thing looking at the bands it supports

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • You could also just sign up for Project Genesis directly, $400 for the moto edge+ 2023 and $25/month for service.
    • Your referring to the $25.00 a month Infinite Unlimited plan?  I don't see any other plans on there even cheaper than that on their website.  I was looking at the Motorola 2023 Edge fwiw as well for $10.00 a month. 
    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...