Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

What if providers don't "work with Sprint to identify respective traffic keys" and just send encrypted data streams?  Since the plans are unlimited won't that mean that people just get unlimited full speed video streaming?

 

As I read it, content providers have "three choices" as listed.

 

If a content provider doesn't provide Sprint with information, then by default "The Sprint Network will optimize streaming rates utilizing the above respective limits for customers on the Unlimited Freedom Plan."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I read it, content providers have "three choices" as listed.

 

If a content provider doesn't provide Sprint with information, then by default "The Sprint Network will optimize streaming rates utilizing the above respective limits for customers on the Unlimited Freedom Plan."

Which to me this approach is night and day better than TMO in that it's a more fair playing field. And more in line with Net Neutrality

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That AT&T requirement for DTV is huge for people like myself who live in NYC and can't get satellite TV, since that drives the purchase consideration.

 

If I had a house it would look appealing, otherwise it's not a fair comparison. 

 

Do you have Uverse available there from AT&T?

 

So long as Uverse is available, it only starts at $20 monthly if you can get someone at AT&T to give U-basic. Plus, with bundling discounts, it doesn't cost much more than Sprint and T-Mobile. Besides the Freelancers Union discount I've mentioned, there is another discount membership called "Founders Card" that gives a discount too. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious...is this off the entire plan or just a certain portion?

 

I get the discount off of the entire Unlimited Data plan. My mother and I both have lines, and so that normally costs $140 monthly. The discount is 22% off of that, so around $30 monthly discount for two lines. I'm not sure what others here mean by 60.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I read it, content providers have "three choices" as listed.

 

If a content provider doesn't provide Sprint with information, then by default "The Sprint Network will optimize streaming rates utilizing the above respective limits for customers on the Unlimited Freedom Plan."

I guess my question is about how Sprint will know what the data is.  If you're receiving data over a TLS encrypted connection, how does Sprint decide that it's video and should be throttled to 2Mbps or audio and should be throttled to 500kbps or neither and shouldn't be throttled at all?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess my question is about how Sprint will know what the data is.  If you're receiving data over a TLS encrypted connection, how does Sprint decide that it's video and should be throttled to 2Mbps or audio and should be throttled to 500kbps or neither and shouldn't be throttled at all?

 

I like Sprint, but I find the audio throttling a bit ridiculous. Surely, the video throttling is understandable, as it can be very stressful on the network, but audio streaming?

 

T-Mobile definitely offers a better deal when it comes to listening to streaming music. As much I hate to say this, I think this is the one time I'd love to hear John Legere call out Sprint for that. Most people here know I'm not at all a fan of his, but this time it would make sense for him to do that, and I'd support him for it this time around. Throttling audio just seems like a cheap move to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Sprint, but I find the audio throttling a bit ridiculous. Surely, the video throttling is understandable, as it can be very stressful on the network, but audio streaming?

 

T-Mobile definitely offers a better deal when it comes to listening to streaming music. As much I hate to say this, I think this is the one time I'd love to hear John Legere call out Sprint for that. Most people here know I'm not at all a fan of his, but this time it would make sense for him to do that, and I'd support him for it this time around. Throttling audio just seems like a cheap move to me.

500kbps is more than enough for high definition audio. I can't really think of any music service that would even require that kind of throughout. Pretty much all hd audio maxes at 320kbps and not all tracks are even necessarily available at that quality.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the discount off of the entire Unlimited Data plan. My mother and I both have lines, and so that normally costs $140 monthly. The discount is 22% off of that, so around $30 monthly discount for two lines. I'm not sure what others here mean by 60.

The 22% should only be off, of the data portion and not the access fees which are $40 per device for the Unlimited plan.

 

At least that's what it should be.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Sprint, but I find the audio throttling a bit ridiculous. Surely, the video throttling is understandable, as it can be very stressful on the network, but audio streaming?

 

T-Mobile definitely offers a better deal when it comes to listening to streaming music. As much I hate to say this, I think this is the one time I'd love to hear John Legere call out Sprint for that. Most people here know I'm not at all a fan of his, but this time it would make sense for him to do that, and I'd support him for it this time around. Throttling audio just seems like a cheap move to me.

 

uhh...streaming music is throttled at 500 kps, it's the same thing as not throttled.   What beef do you have with this? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure about discounts on Sprint, though if a business offers it, then great. Discounts on wireless service are good to have.

 

The 22% off discount on AT&T service I found out about through S4GRU member gusherb, who mentioned it here somewhere on the forums some time ago. In order to get the discount, there is an organization online called the Freelancers Union, The membership is free and it gives members a wide variety of discounts to many different services, including AT&T.

  

This is the direct link to the Freelancers Union AT&T discount page :

 

https://www.freelancersunion.org/discounts/detail/ATT

Keep in mind anyone seeing this that Freelancers is for people with their own businesses and such. Please don't abuse it, I would hate to see this nice discount taken away.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

500kbps is more than enough for high definition audio. I can't really think of any music service that would even require that kind of throughout. Pretty much all hd audio maxes at 320kbps and not all tracks are even necessarily available at that quality.

 

There is Tidal HiFi streaming that goes over that limit though. I forget what the exact number is though, but its certainly not nearly as network intensive as video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 22% should only be off, of the data portion and not the access fees which are $40 per device for the Unlimited plan.

 

At least that's what it should be.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I'm not sure, but the 22% off is how its being done on our deal. I'll look into it more though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uhh...streaming music is throttled at 500 kps, it's the same thing as not throttled.   What beef do you have with this? 

 

The limit isn't enough for streaming Tidal HiFi. Besides that though, its a petty to limit audio, as its not anywhere near as network intensive as video. Also, it looks bad for Sprint to this, especially when T-Mobile is not. Sprint has much more spectrum available on its network an more capacity than T-Mobile, so having this limit on audio, not a very good thing. Surprisingly the bigger complaint online so far about this new plan isn't even that, but rather the limit on gaming.

 

Since according to John Legere's twitter account, he's on a plane traveling, it may be a bit before he responds to this, but I'm not doubting he will. I'm hoping Sprint will come around though and make a few changes to match T-Mobile's limits, then that will be fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The limit isn't enough for streaming Tidal HiFi. Besides that though, its a petty to limit audio, as its not anywhere near as network intensive as video. Also, it looks bad for Sprint to this, especially when T-Mobile is not. Sprint has much more spectrum available on its network an more capacity than T-Mobile, so having this limit on audio, not a very good thing. Surprisingly the bigger complaint online so far about this new plan isn't even that, but rather the limit on gaming.

 

Since according to John Legere's twitter account, he's on a plane traveling, it may be a bit before he responds to this, but I'm not doubting he will. I'm hoping Sprint will come around though and make a few changes to match T-Mobile's limits, then that will be fine. 

You have to pay extra for the Tidal HiFi.  Majority of people can't even tell when audio is played at HD or HiFi.

 

Legere would have nothing on Sprint with their Unlimited Data offer.  Tmo One has more charges for the "add-on" premiums than Sprint (hotspot and autopay).  If anything, Sprint should have an outline of the differences between the two plans and call out Tmo price structure. 

Edited by Hmight
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have Uverse available there from AT&T?

 

So long as Uverse is available, it only starts at $20 monthly if you can get someone at AT&T to give U-basic. Plus, with bundling discounts, it doesn't cost much more than Sprint and T-Mobile. Besides the Freelancers Union discount I've mentioned, there is another discount membership called "Founders Card" that gives a discount too.

NYC doesn't have U-Verse.

Deval, depending where you are you can get DirecTV. Maybe not in Manhattan, but I know for a fact in Brooklyn some apartments you can install the dish right by your balcony or by a window.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NYC doesn't have U-Verse.

Deval, depending where you are you can get DirecTV. Maybe not in Manhattan, but I know for a fact in Brooklyn some apartments you can install the dish right by your balcony or by a window.

While technically true, I do not believe most people would settle for 12mbs internet vs 300+ offered by FIOS and Cable companies.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to pay extra for the Tidal HiFi.  Majority of people can't even tell when audio is played at HD or HiFi.

 

Legere would have nothing on Sprint with their Unlimited Data offer.  Tmo One has more charges for the "add-on" premiums than Sprint (hotspot and autopay).  If anything, Sprint should have an outline of the differences between the two plans and call out Tmo price structure. 

 

People do pay extra for Tidal HiFi, and they want it to work well on the wireless network they subscribe to. Personally though, I'd rather Deezer launch their HiFi service beyond just for people who own and listen through their Sonos music system, as Deezer has a larger music collection than does Tidal. However, Tidal is fine for now. The HiFi version does make a difference for those who notice it. John Legere could advertise that to T-Mobile customers and those potential customers as the service to work better for HiFi music. All Sprint needs to do is remove the audio limit, and they'll have a clear advantage over T-Mobile, both in terms of network and in price.

 

NYC doesn't have U-Verse.

Deval, depending where you are you can get DirecTV. Maybe not in Manhattan, but I know for a fact in Brooklyn some apartments you can install the dish right by your balcony or by a window.

 

I wasn't aware about Uverse being available there or not. Seems Verizon has a hold on that market with Fios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People do pay extra for Tidal HiFi, and they want it to work well on the wireless network they subscribe to.

Coincidence may have it, Sprint is sponsoring some Tidal event. BTW Tidal HiFi bitrate is 1141kbps. So either way it fits under Sprint max allowed mbs for audio streaming.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coincidence may have it, Sprint is sponsoring some Tidal event. BTW Tidal HiFi bitrate is 1141kbps. So either way it fits under Sprint max allowed mbs for audio streaming.

 

My guess is Sprint will likely change some of the limits on the maximum plan eventually, audio being one of them. With this event though you mentioned, I wouldn't be surprised if they included free HiFi streaming with Tidal, but did it in a way not to be exclusive, as per Net Neutrality. Maybe Sprint doesn't want some streaming service coming along that gives 32-bit streaming that takes up more of the network than Tidal's 16-bit, which may be why these limits, I'm not sure. Although still, I've seen some complaints on the gaming limits, so it'll be interesting how Sprint addresses it.

 

All for fun, wouldn't it be something if Verizon announced unlimited music streaming at 64kbps maximum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coincidence may have it, Sprint is sponsoring some Tidal event. BTW Tidal HiFi bitrate is 1141kbps.

 

You transposed some digits -- 1411.2 kbps.  But that is not Tidal HiFi bit rate, which is variable.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You transposed some digits -- 1411.2 kbps.  But that is not Tidal HiFi bit rate, which is variable.

 

AJ

Am I reading something wrong here..

 

Quote from their page

 

Normal quality:

 

96 kbps (AAC +)

 

High quality:

 

320 kbps (AAC)

 

HiFi:

 

Flac 1411 kbps - Lossless

 

(16/44.1 khz)

 

https://support.tidal.com/hc/en-us/articles/201594722-How-good-is-the-sound-quality-on-TIDAL-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't aware about Uverse being available there or not. Seems Verizon has a hold on that market with Fios.

Here's a history lesson for you Arysyn, since I know you'd appreciate it - the New York Telephone Company merged to become Verizon. Verizon controls all the copper lines here, and FiOS is their initiative to replace all copper with fiber optic.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...