Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

At the high end, do not use "unlimited" data for comparison -- because the cost per "unlimited" GB asymptotically approaches zero.  Instead, use the greatest common factor, which is 100 GB due to VZW.  Consider "unlimited" to be 100 GB.  Anyone who uses greater than 100 GB of mobile data should be smacked upside the head for being ridiculous.  And do not exclude the AT&T DirecTV "unlimited" data bundle -- if that is the least expensive way to obtain 100 GB, go with it.

 

AJ

But then there is a problem since neither T-Mobile nor Sprint have tiers that high and they also don't charge overages. Instead what you're left with is effectively unlimited data. It's just slow. That would mean that T-Mobile would top out at $8/GB and Sprint at $2.50/GB since their highest tiers are 10GB and 40GB respectively. For now I have edited it to show AT&T's Unlimited plan pricing per gig and left both S and TMUS's unlimited pricing until I figure out a better way to show it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But then there is a problem since neither T-Mobile nor Sprint have tiers that high and they also don't charge overages. Instead what you're left with is effectively unlimited data. It's just slow. That would mean that T-Mobile would top out at $8/GB and Sprint at $2.50/GB since their highest tiers are 10GB and 40GB respectively. For now I have edited it to show AT&T's Unlimited plan pricing per gig and left both S and TMUS's unlimited pricing until I figure out a better way to show it.

 

My point is -- for the sake of calculations -- you consider "unlimited" to be 100 GB.  Just take the price of any "unlimited" plan and divide by 100.  That is the cost per GB.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is -- for the sake of calculations -- you consider "unlimited" to be 100 GB.  Just take the price of any "unlimited" plan and divide by 100.  That is the cost per GB.

 

AJ

 

Oh, that's exactly what I did. That's why my chart stops at 100.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well this is new: Unlimited Freedom Plan

 

$60/Month for Line 1

$40/Month for Line 2

$25/Month for Lines 3-10

 

 

 

No more worrying about running out of data or surprise overage charges. With Sprint’s Unlimited Freedom Plan, you get two lines of unlimited data, talk and text for only $100/mo. Or, you can get one line for just $60/mo. All while on the Sprint Network.

Enjoy unlimited optimized streaming videos and music, and unlimited 4G LTE data for everything else. (Streaming may be optimized with video streams at up to 480p+ resolution and music streams at extreme quality – at up to 500kbps)

 

 

Streaming may be optimized with video streams at up to 480p+ resolution and music streams at extreme quality (at up to 500kbps). All while on the Sprint Network. Data deprioritization applies during times of congestion. Other monthly charges apply.** Offer available for limited time in Milwaukee and Boston.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well this is new: Unlimited Freedom Plan

 

$60/Month for Line 1

$40/Month for Line 2

$25/Month for Lines 3-10

Wait so if I'm reading this right music and video is free now? Outside of that it seems as though that little announcement Verizon made about carry over data and being able to use data past your limit without being charged a overage has Sprint and Tmobile a little shook because this is the fastest I've seen them react to anything.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait so if I'm reading this right music and video is free now? Outside of that it seems as though that little announcement Verizon made about carry over data and being able to use data past your limit without being charged a overage has Sprint and Tmobile a little shook because this is the fastest I've seen them react to anything.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

 

Verizon's Safety Mode data is at 128kbps.

 

This isn't that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it offer 3GB of tethering? I never knew how much I'd use tethering until I got it.

 

Doesn't appear to on the surface. Anyone here from Milwaukee or Boston?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait so if I'm reading this right music and video is free now? Outside of that it seems as though that little announcement Verizon made about carry over data and being able to use data past your limit without being charged a overage has Sprint and Tmobile a little shook because this is the fastest I've seen them react to anything.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

 

It just seems like an unlimited price decrease. I'm trying to figure out what the trade-offs are. I'll switch to this if it doesn't mean I'll lose my tethering.

 

Also how did you find this? It's not on their homepage and not on their newsroom site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon's Safety Mode data is at 128kbps.

 

This isn't that.

Right I know that. I'm saying just from the basis of coming out with newer plans around the time Verizon made their announcement officially minus the rumors.

 

What really sets these new plans apart from the current full blown unlimited for $75?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right I know that. I'm saying just from the basis of coming out with newer plans around the time Verizon made their announcement officially minus the rumors.

 

What really sets these new plans apart from the current full blown unlimited for $75?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

The video quality limits? I don't remember that as part of the old unlimited.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just seems like an unlimited price decrease. I'm trying to figure out what the trade-offs are. I'll switch to this if it doesn't mean I'll lose my tethering.

 

Also how did you find this? It's not on their homepage and not on their newsroom site.

 

Some friends of mine in Boston told me about it and sent me the link.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right I know that. I'm saying just from the basis of coming out with newer plans around the time Verizon made their announcement officially minus the rumors.

 

What really sets these new plans apart from the current full blown unlimited for $75?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

 

The audio/video optimization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The video quality limits? I don't remember that as part of the old unlimited.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

They aren't enforced with strict bitrate limits on the existing unlimited plans. For this new plan, there are explicitly stated bitrate limits for audio and video content.

 

Sprint does video optimization on existing unlimited plans. See the Terms & Conditions: https://sprint.com/legal/open_internet_information.html

 

Does Sprint employ any type of data compression or optimization on the Sprint network today?

Yes, Sprint deploys network optimization capabilities for video and web traffic on the Sprint Wireless Network. Intent is to improve overall user experience and increase network efficiency. Optimization helps improve page load times and reduces video stalling. The optimization technology provides for the elimination of wasted data transmissions that result from lack of coordination between applications, network, and device, for example stopping transmission of video after a customer has stopped viewing it. It also matches media transmission quality to the capability of the device viewing the media.

What specific types of optimization does Sprint employ?

Video optimization is deployed for RTSP and HTTP video traffic and all HTTP web traffic. Video optimization is always deployed and active on the Sprint network for all identifiable video traffic.  Although the purpose of the optimization techniques is to improve overall video viewing experience, it is possible that some users may experience minor discernable reductions in image quality when viewing video traffic on certain devices.  These reductions should generally be offset by improvement s in load times and reductions in video stalling and other experience improvements.  Sprint’s video optimization uses four basic technologies:

  • Video Delivery Synchronization: Delivers video "just in time" to the mobile device. Intent is to eliminate network waste associated with transmitting video that isn't watched.
  • Quality Aware Transcoding: Matches video quality with network conditions in real time. Optimizes video for the bandwidth available to the user. Intent is to minimize or eliminate annoying video stalling. Similar in concept to the optimization techniques already employed by sites using adaptive streaming.
  • Video Transcoding: Transcodes video with intent to optimize the video experience for the user while efficiently using network bandwidth. Provides for the elimination of video waste using techniques like replacing less efficient video codecs with more efficient ones. Optimizes video for the mobile device the customer is using.
  • Intelligent Caching: Caches optimized video in the network with the intent of eliminating delay associated with internet video sites.

Some streaming video applications employ adaptive bitrate protocol to stream video. These applications automatically and continuously monitor the available bandwidth and adjust the streaming video bitrate to current user conditions. Depending on available bandwidth, users may notice differences in video streaming quality as the application adjusts the video streaming bitrate to account for changing channel conditions.

What specific types of web optimization does Sprint employ?

Web optimization is deployed for all HTTP web traffic and is always deployed and active on the Sprint network for all identifiable web traffic. Although the purpose of the optimization techniques is to improve overall web viewing experience, it is possible that some users may experience minor discernable reductions in image quality when viewing web traffic on certain devices.  These reductions should generally be offset by improvement s in load times and other experience improvements.  Web optimization uses three basic technologies:

  • Caching: Caches web pages to help avoid delays associated with retrieval of the same internet content multiple times.
  • Text/Binary Compression: Lossless compression of data and binary files using standard compression techniques supported by HTTP-compliant browsers.
  • Image Compression: JPEG and GIF compression designed to reduce the size of images while maintaining no user perceptible loss of quality
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I would hate to see what happens when the battery dies on the flying COW.  Another Chick-Fil-A commercial of COW's falling from the sky? 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They'll need one heck of a stability system on the drone right if it's sending out signal, right? Will you lose coverage with a wind gust that moves it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'll need one heck of a stability system on the drone right if it's sending out signal, right? Will you lose coverage with a wind gust that moves it?

 

No.  Do you lose coverage when you are moving 70 mph in a car?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.  Do you lose coverage when you are moving 70 mph in a car?

 

AJ

 

I guess not!

 

I was assuming it was fed by some kind of wireless backhaul (probably not wired) that would require it to be in a certain orientation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would hate to see what happens when the battery dies on the flying COW.  Another Chick-Fil-A commercial of COW's falling from the sky? 

 

Would a Goodyear Blimp be a better solution for a flying COW?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I haven't seen any Sprint small cells in New York City light poles,but I have seen plenty of Verizon ones. In fact big evil red alone with crown Castle are installing small cells in my neighborhood (Morningside Heights, Columbia University campus)

 

They wouldn't be labeled Sprint, would be hidden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...