Jump to content

Report: T-Mobile overtakes Sprint in Q1 as No. 3 U.S. smartphone carrier


dkyeager
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/report-t-mobile-overtakes-sprint-q1-no-3-us-smartphone-carrier/2014-05-22

 

What I find interesting about this report is how apple dominates the top two carriers.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just measuring smartphone additions in one quarter... Obviously T-Mobile is going to have higher numbers for a while with all of their special promotions. Their ETF promotion is allowing millions of people to buy new smartphones much earlier than they would be able/willing to without it. Since the promotion is insanely expensive (up to $350 per switcher), T-Mobile will not be able to offer it for an extended period of time, and their smartphone sales numbers will fall back in line with their subscriber numbers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just measuring smartphone additions in one quarter... Obviously T-Mobile is going to have higher numbers for a while with all of their special promotions. Their ETF promotion is allowing millions of people to buy new smartphones much earlier than they would be able/willing to without it. Since the promotion is insanely expensive (up to $350 per switcher), T-Mobile will not be able to offer it for an extended period of time, and their smartphone sales numbers will fall back in line with their subscriber numbers.

 

Yup another example of poor (and probably dishonest) reporting...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't sprint use tablets to skew their subscriber growth numbers? Maybe this is just an effort to show the numbers minus tablets? Either way, Sprint really does need to start adding subscribers or eventually they will be overtaken.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't sprint use tablets to skew their subscriber growth numbers? Maybe this is just an effort to show the numbers minus tablets? Either way, Sprint really does need to start adding subscribers or eventually they will be overtaken.

 Sprint was not alone in trying to use tablets to boost numbers.  I believe AT&T as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is some mighty fine click bait, y'all.

 

"T-Mobile US (NYSE:TMUS), along with its MetroPCS prepaid brand, surpassed Sprint (NYSE: S) and Sprint's MVNOs as the third-largest U.S. carrier in terms of smartphone volumes in the first quarter, according to a new research report."

 

The headline leads a reader to draw the conclusion that Sprint was passed over by TMO completely, and is now squarely in 4th place in the great carrier ePenis measuring contest.

 

At any rate, hopefully this lights a fire under Sprint/Softbank's ass and doubles down on the commitment to a speedy, efficient rollout.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that all the carriers use tablets to increase their numbers. Verizon is huge with advertising their tablets here, much more so than Sprint or AT&T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just measuring smartphone additions in one quarter... Obviously T-Mobile is going to have higher numbers for a while with all of their special promotions. Their ETF promotion is allowing millions of people to buy new smartphones much earlier than they would be able/willing to without it. Since the promotion is insanely expensive (up to $350 per switcher), T-Mobile will not be able to offer it for an extended period of time, and their smartphone sales numbers will fall back in line with their subscriber numbers.

You realize it's not a promotion right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You realize it's not a promotion right?

I guess that depends on what your definition of promotion is. From T-Mobile's website on the ETF program

" Limited time offer; subject to change. At participating locations. Eligible device trade-in, new device purchase, qualifying credit, port-in from eligible carriers (incl. AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint), and qualifying postpaid service required. "

Limited time offer makes me think promotion.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You realize it's not a promotion right?

How could it not be? It's simply not sustainable. They're doing it to boost their subscriber numbers despite the fact that it's destroying their margins. It's a strategy to make them more attractive as an acquisition target, period.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How could it not be? It's simply not sustainable. They're doing it to boost their subscriber numbers despite the fact that it's destroying their margins. It's a strategy to make them more attractive as an acquisition target, period.

It would be more additive if you would explain why it is destroying their margins.

 

100 million in 1Q... to have more gross adds than all other carriers combined. There is a reason why other carriers knocked the program off.

 

As far as promotional, they have said it is not ending any time soon. Promotional was what Sprint and ATT were doing.

 

I am just baffled that you think that it is destroying the margins. Why do they need 50% margins? What margins do they need and why can't they offer this etf offer long term? Why do you think it costs them a lot of money?

 

The strategy is to add subscribers. Their goal is to maximize shareholder value. More subs do not make them more attractive... It's unattractive because it will cost Sprint more to bid on them if they decide to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's extremely expensive... With the plan pricing they're offering, they're spending months and months of revenue to acquire each customer, customers that are under no obligation to stay with T-Mobile.

 

It's funny you ask why T-Mobile needs to maintain their margins and then mention shareholder value. The only reason it's adding shareholder value is because it's more attractive as a takeover target. The TMUS share price is being completely driven by the anticipation of acquisition.

 

The fact that it makes them more expensive to acquire is perfect evidence that it's making them a more attractive target. That's how the market works.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's extremely expensive... With the plan pricing they're offering, they're spending months and months of revenue to acquire each customer, customers that are under no obligation to stay with T-Mobile.

It's funny you ask why T-Mobile needs to maintain their margins and then mention shareholder value. The only reason it's adding shareholder value is because it's more attractive as a takeover target. The TMUS share price is being completely driven by the anticipation of acquisition.

The fact that it makes them more expensive to acquire is perfect evidence that it's making them a more attractive target. That's how the market works.

Among many other cons Sprint will be buying back a large portion of their old customer base back if they purchase T-Mobile. These new T-Mobile customers which are old Sprint customers will soon start seeing that service is not that great in areas outside the city and blame Sprint. This is a double edged sword for Sprint. Sprint should have done a better job educating their customers about NV and all its up and coming aspects and this wouldn't have happen.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be more additive if you would explain why it is destroying their margins.

 

100 million in 1Q... to have more gross adds than all other carriers combined. There is a reason why other carriers knocked the program off.

 

As far as promotional, they have said it is not ending any time soon. Promotional was what Sprint and ATT were doing.

 

I am just baffled that you think that it is destroying the margins. Why do they need 50% margins? What margins do they need and why can't they offer this etf offer long term? Why do you think it costs them a lot of money?

 

The strategy is to add subscribers. Their goal is to maximize shareholder value. More subs do not make them more attractive... It's unattractive because it will cost Sprint more to bid on them if they decide to.

Just assume for a moment that every one of those 100 million adds to advantage of the $350 to switch. That would be 35 billion dollars. If you break it down to a yearly cost and assume that the average T-mo plan is $50 a month then t- mobile has spent the first seven months recouping the cost of gaining the customer. You still have to account for T-mo overhead. After its all said and done the first 10 months are probably a wash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Some more interesting articles on Dish: https://www.fiercewireless.com/5g/dish-wireless-bakes-core-principles-infrastructure-chua https://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/dish-eyes-5g-network-reliability-vericas-chaos-engineering-platform    
    • Financially makes sense, but may put them far behind T-Mobile and Verizon 5g marketing.  Could put them up against Dish if Dish gets their act together and starts their public network in Las Vegas in late February.
    • Fiercewireless put out an article today.  Sounds like AT&T wont get heavily started until later this year when equipment will be more available that supports both 3.45GHz and C-Band.
    • They are using DSS on B5 here, on one carrier. LTE-only on the other AFAIK. I kinda hope AT&T doesn't turn DSS on in markets where dropping H+ bumps them from 5x5 for everything else to 10x10. They have 10x10 of B14 and 5x5-10x10 of B12 to throw users on, and with the delays to their C-Band deployment due to waiting for gear their network is effectively LTE-only in many areas despite an increasing proportion of 5G phones. The network was doing just fine without the extra B5 bandwidth, so not a whole lot of reason to basically go backwards when they said they're dropping 3G to expand 5G.
    • DISH Sets Data in Motion with Confluent, Unlocking the Power of the First 5G Smart Network™   https://ir.dish.com/news-releases/news-release-details/dish-sets-data-motion-confluent-unlocking-power-first-5g-smart
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...