Jump to content

Rootmetrics national report


Recommended Posts

http://rootmetrics.com/rsr/usa

 

2nd half 2013. At least Sprint didn't come in last in overall performance. I guess that's progress.  :wacko:

 

I think that they're *ok* considering that they're 5x5 MHz LTE has had to go up against their competitors 10x10 LTE networks (in most places). Hopefully their performance can improve further as more Band 26 and Band 41 LTE comes online. Ericsson :whip:  Samsung :whip:  Alcatel-Lucent :whip:  NSN :whip:

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://rootmetrics.com/rsr/usa

 

2nd half 2013. At least Sprint didn't come in last in overall performance. I guess that's progress. :wacko:

 

I think that they're *ok* considering that they're 5x5 MHz LTE has had to go up against their competitors 10x10 LTE networks (in most places). Hopefully their performance can improve further as more Band 26 and Band 41 LTE comes online. Ericsson :whip: Samsung :whip: Alcatel-Lucent :whip: NSN :whip:

No need to crack the whip at Samsung, they are really picking up the pace. Pulverizing Ericsson and Alcatel-Lucent is ok, and I don't think NSN is starting on Band 41 upgrades yet. I think they will by Q2 though.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint is spending about $7 billion this year on network construction, refitting its former Nextel network and incorporating the added t no one is out of the running, this is going to evolve into an interesting horse race,” Moore said.

“T-Mobile has taken the gloves off, and Sprint’s going through a transitional period right now, but what we see with their new Spark network could be a game changer.”

To contact the reporter

 

even they admit that band 41 will be a game changer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to crack the whip at Samsung, they are really picking up the pace. Pulverizing Ericsson and Alcatel-Lucent is ok, and I don't think NSN is starting on Band 41 upgrades yet. I think they will by Q2 though.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

 

True, Samsung has been a pretty decent NV vendor thus far. I guess my thinking is no matter how good you may doing, there's always room for improvement.

 

Sprint is spending about $7 billion this year on network construction, refitting its former Nextel network and incorporating the added t no one is out of the running, this is going to evolve into an interesting horse race,” Moore said.

“T-Mobile has taken the gloves off, and Sprint’s going through a transitional period right now, but what we see with their new Spark network could be a game changer.”

To contact the reporter

 

even they admit that band 41 will be a game changer.

 

They're shortchanging by saying $7B, but Sprint has already gone on record stating that they expect to spend $8B in CAPEX this year. Every billion helps. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I see with the tests done by root metrics now is with the new class of single radio tri-band phones, when doing tests while connected to LTE, it reports a voice connection failure. I am not sure if or how Root Metrics corrects for that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I see with the tests done by root metrics now is with the new class of single radio tri-band phones, when doing tests while connected to LTE, it reports a voice connection failure. I am not sure if or how Root Metrics corrects for that.

 

I noticed that after getting my Nexus 5, I have not run a root metrics test since then. If they correct that I will run test with them again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not the worst result possible, considering the volume of change the network went through. It should only get better from here on.

 

It always annoys me though when bar charts have their axes shifted to magnify differences. Things would appear more competitive if all bars started from zero.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I see with the tests done by root metrics now is with the new class of single radio tri-band phones, when doing tests while connected to LTE, it reports a voice connection failure. I am not sure if or how Root Metrics corrects for that.

 

Aren't T-Mobile and AT&T devices single radio?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran test with my LG G2, when connected to LTE it failed the voice connection and did noticed change in map color from green to grey, they need to fix this i bet with sensorly Sprint tops the chart.

 

Check out my Ookla Speedtest result. What's your speed? http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/753094963

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran test with my LG G2, when connected to LTE it failed the voice connection and did noticed change in map color from green to grey, they need to fix this i bet with sensorly Sprint tops the chart.

Check out my Ookla Speedtest result. What's your speed? http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/753094963

On Sensorly, Sprint and Verizon regularly beat out the other 2 on my area, at least when going to the compare section in the app.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Sensorly, Sprint and Verizon regularly beat out the other 2 on my area, at least when going to the compare section in the app.

And this shows the importance of 2.6. It is how their network becomes the standard (at least with in metro areas).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect that reliability index, call, text, and data performance to by-pass Verizon by next summer.   :)

 

In markets where upgrades are nearly complete, Sprint is ranked just as high as the other carriers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect that reliability index, call, text, and data performance to by-pass Verizon by next summer.   :)

 

How?

If there is no network, Sprint and T-Mobile don't have a chance of bypassing AT&T or VZW.

 

That rootmetrics report looks pretty accurate to me from my experience with all 4 networks. The T-Mobile CEO is living in a dreamland,  or just using his acting/advertising skills to shout to his boys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How?

If there is no network, Sprint and T-Mobile don't have a chance of bypassing AT&T or VZW.

 

That rootmetrics report looks pretty accurate to me from my experience with all 4 networks. The T-Mobile CEO is living in a dreamland,  or just using his acting/advertising skills to shout to his boys.

 

RootMetrics says that speed+reliability= coverage.

 

Sprint's network covers most states. Even if Sprint were able to win a few states, that would knock Verizon off of their pedestal, seeing as though currently, there is a tie in more states than there are states where any other carrier has won. Sprint has all the resources. All they need is great execution. Sprint might never cover all 50 states but they can try to do better in the areas that they do serve.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RootMetrics says that speed+reliability= coverage.

 

Sprint's network covers most states. Even if Sprint were able to win a few states, that would knock Verizon off of their pedestal, seeing as though currently, there is a tie in more states than there are states where any other carrier has won. Sprint has all the resources. All they need is great execution. Sprint might never cover all 50 states but they can try to do better in the areas that they do serve.

Execution is the key. And waiting until the end of 2015 to have 100 markets where they offer competitive speeds/capacity is not, in my mind at least, not a recipe for great execution. In any case the company that should b e really worried is att. They are going to have to work harder and be more credit s give to keep their network competitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...