Jump to content

Rootmetrics national report


Recommended Posts

http://rootmetrics.com/rsr/usa

 

2nd half 2013. At least Sprint didn't come in last in overall performance. I guess that's progress.  :wacko:

 

I think that they're *ok* considering that they're 5x5 MHz LTE has had to go up against their competitors 10x10 LTE networks (in most places). Hopefully their performance can improve further as more Band 26 and Band 41 LTE comes online. Ericsson :whip:  Samsung :whip:  Alcatel-Lucent :whip:  NSN :whip:

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://rootmetrics.com/rsr/usa

 

2nd half 2013. At least Sprint didn't come in last in overall performance. I guess that's progress. :wacko:

 

I think that they're *ok* considering that they're 5x5 MHz LTE has had to go up against their competitors 10x10 LTE networks (in most places). Hopefully their performance can improve further as more Band 26 and Band 41 LTE comes online. Ericsson :whip: Samsung :whip: Alcatel-Lucent :whip: NSN :whip:

No need to crack the whip at Samsung, they are really picking up the pace. Pulverizing Ericsson and Alcatel-Lucent is ok, and I don't think NSN is starting on Band 41 upgrades yet. I think they will by Q2 though.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint is spending about $7 billion this year on network construction, refitting its former Nextel network and incorporating the added t no one is out of the running, this is going to evolve into an interesting horse race,” Moore said.

“T-Mobile has taken the gloves off, and Sprint’s going through a transitional period right now, but what we see with their new Spark network could be a game changer.”

To contact the reporter

 

even they admit that band 41 will be a game changer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to crack the whip at Samsung, they are really picking up the pace. Pulverizing Ericsson and Alcatel-Lucent is ok, and I don't think NSN is starting on Band 41 upgrades yet. I think they will by Q2 though.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

 

True, Samsung has been a pretty decent NV vendor thus far. I guess my thinking is no matter how good you may doing, there's always room for improvement.

 

Sprint is spending about $7 billion this year on network construction, refitting its former Nextel network and incorporating the added t no one is out of the running, this is going to evolve into an interesting horse race,” Moore said.

“T-Mobile has taken the gloves off, and Sprint’s going through a transitional period right now, but what we see with their new Spark network could be a game changer.”

To contact the reporter

 

even they admit that band 41 will be a game changer.

 

They're shortchanging by saying $7B, but Sprint has already gone on record stating that they expect to spend $8B in CAPEX this year. Every billion helps. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I see with the tests done by root metrics now is with the new class of single radio tri-band phones, when doing tests while connected to LTE, it reports a voice connection failure. I am not sure if or how Root Metrics corrects for that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I see with the tests done by root metrics now is with the new class of single radio tri-band phones, when doing tests while connected to LTE, it reports a voice connection failure. I am not sure if or how Root Metrics corrects for that.

 

I noticed that after getting my Nexus 5, I have not run a root metrics test since then. If they correct that I will run test with them again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not the worst result possible, considering the volume of change the network went through. It should only get better from here on.

 

It always annoys me though when bar charts have their axes shifted to magnify differences. Things would appear more competitive if all bars started from zero.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I see with the tests done by root metrics now is with the new class of single radio tri-band phones, when doing tests while connected to LTE, it reports a voice connection failure. I am not sure if or how Root Metrics corrects for that.

 

Aren't T-Mobile and AT&T devices single radio?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran test with my LG G2, when connected to LTE it failed the voice connection and did noticed change in map color from green to grey, they need to fix this i bet with sensorly Sprint tops the chart.

 

Check out my Ookla Speedtest result. What's your speed? http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/753094963

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran test with my LG G2, when connected to LTE it failed the voice connection and did noticed change in map color from green to grey, they need to fix this i bet with sensorly Sprint tops the chart.

Check out my Ookla Speedtest result. What's your speed? http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/753094963

On Sensorly, Sprint and Verizon regularly beat out the other 2 on my area, at least when going to the compare section in the app.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Sensorly, Sprint and Verizon regularly beat out the other 2 on my area, at least when going to the compare section in the app.

And this shows the importance of 2.6. It is how their network becomes the standard (at least with in metro areas).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect that reliability index, call, text, and data performance to by-pass Verizon by next summer.   :)

 

In markets where upgrades are nearly complete, Sprint is ranked just as high as the other carriers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect that reliability index, call, text, and data performance to by-pass Verizon by next summer.   :)

 

How?

If there is no network, Sprint and T-Mobile don't have a chance of bypassing AT&T or VZW.

 

That rootmetrics report looks pretty accurate to me from my experience with all 4 networks. The T-Mobile CEO is living in a dreamland,  or just using his acting/advertising skills to shout to his boys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How?

If there is no network, Sprint and T-Mobile don't have a chance of bypassing AT&T or VZW.

 

That rootmetrics report looks pretty accurate to me from my experience with all 4 networks. The T-Mobile CEO is living in a dreamland,  or just using his acting/advertising skills to shout to his boys.

 

RootMetrics says that speed+reliability= coverage.

 

Sprint's network covers most states. Even if Sprint were able to win a few states, that would knock Verizon off of their pedestal, seeing as though currently, there is a tie in more states than there are states where any other carrier has won. Sprint has all the resources. All they need is great execution. Sprint might never cover all 50 states but they can try to do better in the areas that they do serve.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RootMetrics says that speed+reliability= coverage.

 

Sprint's network covers most states. Even if Sprint were able to win a few states, that would knock Verizon off of their pedestal, seeing as though currently, there is a tie in more states than there are states where any other carrier has won. Sprint has all the resources. All they need is great execution. Sprint might never cover all 50 states but they can try to do better in the areas that they do serve.

Execution is the key. And waiting until the end of 2015 to have 100 markets where they offer competitive speeds/capacity is not, in my mind at least, not a recipe for great execution. In any case the company that should b e really worried is att. They are going to have to work harder and be more credit s give to keep their network competitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Unable to confirm if it's really off but I noticed this morning that I'm no longer connecting to Band 41 on my home site. Switching my phone to LTE-only pretty much always put me on Band 41 since it was the least used band on T-Mobile's network. Now I'm only able to connect to Band 2/66. Not complaining because it means speeds are faster on LTE and maybe 150MHz n41 is around the corner.
    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...