Jump to content

Network Vision and Spark EARFCN logging thread


Recommended Posts

30-40 minutes. It was in Joliet. That's still our market.

 

No, not necessarily for EBS.  It is licensed on a radius basis.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Image didn't upload

 

Your EARFCN 40056 is already in our list.  Thanks, though.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see shentel's second carrier listed. Upload 26158 Download 8158.

 

SignalCheck showing location https://www.dropbox.com/s/yq2h81y354hffwv/Screenshot_2014-04-28-17-33-01.png

 

Engineering screen showing channel https://www.dropbox.com/s/bx1wfrq1lxgkv6p/Screenshot_2014-04-28-17-35-41.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see shentel's second carrier listed. Upload 26158 Download 8158

 

Thanks.  Anecdotes about the Shentel secondary band 25 carrier abound, but no one has officially documented it -- until now.  I will add the EARFCNs to the list.  The center frequency choice is a bit unusual, so that may be worth some analysis, too.

 

And I take it that this was in Berkeley Springs, WV in the Washington-Baltimore MTA?  The PCS A block spectrum would seem to necessitate that.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I take it that this was in Berkeley Springs, WV in the Washington-Baltimore MTA?  The PCS A block spectrum would seem to necessitate that.

 

AJ

Berkeley Springs, WV is west of Hagerstown, MD about 60 miles west of Washington DC. It's a small town on national network 522 maybe 1000 people. I personally don't think they need a second carrier but I am sure they were not complaining about the extra spectrum. There is a lot of traffic on 522 people trying to avoid DC traffic. Maybe that is why they added it there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I think we have a new one for you AJ in Omaha.

 

Done.  I have updated the spreadsheet and also corrected a previous minor error.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked through my screenshots, and it looks like I have one that hasn't been reported.

 

B41 - EARFCN: 39858 here in WI.

 

I will upload the screenshot when I get home.  Tapatalk keeps giving me an upload error. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked through my screenshots, and it looks like I have one that hasn't been reported.

 

B41 - EARFCN: 39858 here in WI.

 

I will upload the screenshot when I get home.  Tapatalk keeps giving me an upload error. 

 

When you get a chance, post the screenshot, and I will take a look.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked through my screenshots, and it looks like I have one that hasn't been reported.

 

B41 - EARFCN: 39858 here in WI.

 

I will upload the screenshot when I get home.  Tapatalk keeps giving me an upload error. 

 

 

When you get a chance, post the screenshot, and I will take a look.

 

AJ

 

Below is my screenshot:

 

IMG_0010.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it matters, AJ, but here's a screenshot of the USCC spectrum active in South Bend, Indiana. Same as Chicago. Maybe you can add it to the list of cities?

c30c3fdccd9815f2961cc6099ff67486.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it matters, AJ, but here's a screenshot of the USCC spectrum active in South Bend, Indiana. Same as Chicago. Maybe you can add it to the list of cities?

 

Thanks for the report, but South Bend is in the Chicago market.  So, the same second band 25 carrier does not count as anything new, per se.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint band 41 in South Bend, IN. New frequency?

 

uecker87 in Wisconsin beat you to EARFCN 39858 a few posts above.

 

Regardless, the top post and spreadsheet have now been updated.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

S4GRU staff has been cooperatively working hard behind the scenes today.  We received Sprint insider info of a second band 41 carrier deployed for the World Series in Kansas City, and we were able to verify that with an LTE engineering screenshot.  So, Kansas City is the first confirmed market with a second band 41 carrier ready for carrier aggregation and added capacity across parts of the city.

 

The top post and spreadsheet have been updated.

 

AJ

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

S4GRU staff has been cooperatively working hard behind the scenes today.  We received Sprint insider info of a second band 41 carrier deployed for the World Series in Kansas City, and we were able to verify that with an LTE engineering screenshot.  So, Kansas City is the first confirmed market with a second band 41 carrier ready for carrier aggregation and added capacity across parts of the city.

 

The top post and spreadsheet have been updated.

 

AJ

 

Also second PCS LTE carrier confirmed in Cleveland earfcn 26465/8645 (PCS F Block) and Columbus earfcn 26565 / 8565 PCS C block. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also second PCS LTE carrier confirmed in Cleveland earfcn 26465/8645 (PCS F Block) and Columbus earfcn 26565 / 8565 PCS C block. 

 

Revol, cough, Revol.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...