Jump to content

Network Vision and Spark EARFCN logging thread


Recommended Posts

 

I can send in spreadsheet form, not too many adds

 

Band 25

  • EARFCN 8640 (downlink) [10x10] [PCS C/G Blocks] [dkyeager 8/17/15 screenshot] 1990
  • EARFCN 26640 (uplink) [10x10] [PCS C/G Blocks] [dkyeager 8/17/15 screenshot] 1910

 

 

The first person to find 10x10 in the Columbus market was nowerlater on 8/3 http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4742-columbus-market-mapspreadsheet/page-193#entry434099.  It has also been found in the Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Seattle markets.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder if Its possible For that area to see 10x10 then?

 

 

They would have to expand the second carrier to do that because I don't believe sprint has the PCS C5 block in Des Moines...

 

this is correct, we don't have anything next to the G block here so they would have to eat into the B block more to expand the 2nd B25 to a 10x10. would be nice though because we would then have a 10x10 and a 5x5, but i don't think they will be able to refarm that much CDMA/EVDO anytime soon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is correct, we don't have anything next to the G block here so they would have to eat into the B block more to expand the 2nd B25 to a 10x10. would be nice though because we would then have a 10x10 and a 5x5, but i don't think they will be able to refarm that much CDMA/EVDO anytime soon.

Yea probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is correct, we don't have anything next to the G block here so they would have to eat into the B block more to expand the 2nd B25 to a 10x10. would be nice though because we would then have a 10x10 and a 5x5, but i don't think they will be able to refarm that much CDMA/EVDO anytime soon.

Shows what I know. I thought they could just take the 2 5x5 and, make them one 10X10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shows what I know. I thought they could just take the 2 5x5 and, make them one 10X10.

 

The spectrum has to be contiguous to do that. The B block and G block are not aligned next to each other, so there is no way to combine them. That's why there are only limited markets with a 10x10 carrier right now. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is the right place for this question, but I was wondering why TD-LTE carriers are 19.8mhz apart (198 difference in EARFCN) when they are 20mhz each.  Shouldn't the center frequencies be 20mhz apart (200 difference in EARFCN) to avoid interference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is the right place for this question, but I was wondering why TD-LTE carriers are 19.8mhz apart (198 difference in EARFCN) when they are 20mhz each.  Shouldn't the center frequencies be 20mhz apart (200 difference in EARFCN) to avoid interference?

 

Nope.  The subcarrier occupied bandwidth of an LTE carrier is 90 percent of its total bandwidth.  The other 10 percent is used for unoccupied internal guard bands.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boston Market B41 info (not an HTML expert, so apologies for the formatting):
Channel Name Paired/Unpaired Start Freq (MHz) Center Freq (MHz) Stop Freq (MHz) Guardband Bandwidth (MHz) Regulatory Channels Band Name Area Mode EARFCN (D/L) Downlink (MHz) EARFCN (U/L) Uplinnk (MHz)
L16 (CH1) UNPAIRED 2504.60 2513.60 2522.60 1 18 A1,A2,A3,B1 41 TD 2500 ALL TDD 39826 2513.60 39826 2513.60
L17 (CH2) UNPAIRED 2524.40 2533.40 2542.40 1 18 B1,B2,B3,C1,C2 41 TD 2500 ALL TDD 40024 2533.40 40024 2533.40
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Channel Name Paired/Unpaired Start Freq Center Freq Stop Freq Guardband Bandwidth Regulatory Channels Band Name Area Mode Earfcn DL Downlink (MHz) Earfcn UL Uplink (MHz) L16 (CH1) Unpaired 2,504.60 2,513.60 2,522.60 1 18 A1,A2,A3,B1 41 TD 2500 All TDD 39826 2513.6 39826 2513.6 L17 (CH2) Unpaired 2,524.40 2,533.40 2,542.40 1 18 B1,B2,B3,C1,C2 41 TD 2500 All TDD 40024 2533.4 40024 2533.4

 

I am unsure what you are posting, but this appears to be some sort of log output.

 

You have two 20 MHz TDD band 41 carriers:  the first centered at 2513.6 MHz as EARFCN 39826 and a second centered at 2533.4 MHz as EARFCN 40024.  Both of those are known.  The first already is in the list in the top post.  The second previously has been reported, though I have not gotten around to updating and adding it to the list.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick question - LTE and 1x800 can only be deployed if 1x800 is on channel 476, not 526, right?

We are hoping they deploy b26 3x3 in the 1x800 channel 526 area.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what would the EARFCN of the 3x3 carrier be?

 http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4825-columbus-market-mapspreadsheet-premier-edition/page-94&do=findComment&comment=452869

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PCS B DFW MTA (East Texas)

DL 8309

UL 26309

 

https://goo.gl/photos/PLLDjkcUUCFg1jYK8

 

Aj, I have seen this on about 4 different sites near I-30 from Sulphur Springs, TX to Mt. Pleasant, TX.

I believe that is used in Flint Michigan too

 

Sent from Moto X Pure via Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

620def9e989fbe46d6b2e8eb2087aa60.jpg
So I'm at work where I usually do not get LTE unless the wind blows just right and noticed I had a faint LTE signal.

Mind you I'm in an iPhone 6s Plus so this could be a mistake in the field test app but 8321 denotes a second band 25 carrier right?

 

BTW this is in central Kentucky.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by AppleFanBoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

620def9e989fbe46d6b2e8eb2087aa60.jpg

So I'm at work where I usually do not get LTE unless the wind blows just right and noticed I had a faint LTE signal.

Mind you I'm in an iPhone 6s Plus so this could be a mistake in the field test app but 8321 denotes a second band 25 carrier right?

 

BTW this is in central Kentucky.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep that's a second carrier in the PCS B Block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep that's a second carrier in the PCS B Block.

Nice.

 

What is curious is that I'm now getting a consistent LTE signal now with this carrier throughout my entire building where before I would have to get close to a window to get a LTE signal.

 

We do have cellular repeaters throughout the building so maybe that has something to do with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...