Jump to content

Additional rural coverage


Recommended Posts

Is there any word or rumors of Sprint (with this deployment) increasing their coverage, with maybe more rural coverage?  (maybe in the next 5 yrs)

5 years is a long time. I could imagine Sprint would do something to increase rural coverage in that period of time. By then we will all be with our triband devices with so much unlimited data and speed that we don't know what to do with ourselves. 

 

Edit: too add to this. 800 will increase coverage in rural areas ALOT. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any word or rumors of Sprint (with this deployment) increasing their coverage, with maybe more rural coverage?  (maybe in the next 5 yrs)

 

Truly rural areas?  Doubtful.  Secondary/tertiary markets?  Likely.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/3703-potential-sprint-rural-buildout-by-2016/

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 



Truly rural areas? Doubtful. Secondary/tertiary markets? Likely.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/3703-potential-sprint-rural-buildout-by-2016/

AJ


It's funny when looking back at that post because I bet Robert wasn't thinking about moving to SD at the time.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's funny when looking back at that post because I bet Robert wasn't thinking about moving to SD at the time.

 

I paved the way.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truly rural areas?  Doubtful.  Secondary/tertiary markets?  Likely.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/3703-potential-sprint-rural-buildout-by-2016/

 

AJ

 

Man, do I love that thread.  I go back and read it on days that AT&T pisses me off.  It makes me feel warm inside and full of hope.

 

Robert

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint bids for 600Mhz spectrum and is successful, I feel like this would be a prime opportunity to begin a rural deployment of its wireless services. Even adding 800Mhz voice and LTE to all Wimax protection sites would substantially give Sprint a larger service area as well.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, do I love that thread.  I go back and read it on days that AT&T pisses me off.  It makes me feel warm inside and full of hope.

 

Of course, the warm, full feeling also could be a tumor.

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint bids for 600Mhz spectrum and is successful, I feel like this would be a prime opportunity to begin a rural deployment of its wireless services. Even adding 800Mhz voice and LTE to all Wimax protection sites would substantially give Sprint a larger service area as well.

 

Why would 600 Mhz make that much of a difference? It could put a slightly longer reach on existing tower locations.

 

But they have a lot of existing spectrum that can use, but they have to build or add onto another's tower to use it.

 

Rural is a subjective term, again. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the new Sprint user terms, the amount we're allowed to roam has been reduced.

 

But with the Sprint 800 Mhz spectrum starting to be used now, people will roam a lot less where it is enabled.

I can't wait until I think 2016(?) when its available along the border zones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't sprints roaming agreement with Verizon up soon? I'd think it would be in sprints best interest to try and renew it. Any thoughts? I often find my self roaming on Verizon, even in a native sprint area.

No. Verizon's willingness to take sprint's money for 1x voice and data will not end as long as cdma is around.

What *is* ending in 2016 is sprint's agreement with alltel for preferred roaming rates. Much of it is already mute anyway. The only real change could be less 3g roaming in the standard prl in a very limited number of areas.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont see the need for that when we are trying to get away from evdo eventually and with us already having roaming agreements whenever its fired up would make it more likely to get oversubscribed and less speed with evdo with where smartphones are going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont see the need for that when we are trying to get away from evdo eventually and with us already having roaming agreements whenever its fired up would make it more likely to get oversubscribed and less speed with evdo with where smartphones are going.

It's only needed in areas where its too rural and expensive since EVDO pcs goes as far as 800 LTE so 800 EVDO should go really far so less sites and cheaper to maintain.

 

And 100MB roaming is not much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's only needed in areas where its too rural and expensive since EVDO pcs goes as far as 800 LTE so 800 EVDO should go really far so less sites and cheaper to maintain.

 

And 100MB roaming is not much.

One problem with your idea is there are no devices on the market that support EV-DO on the SMR frequencies that Sprint has. Unless I'm wrong (which I wouldn't be surprised) then you would have to start selling devices to people that support 800 EV-DO, which would be counter-productive since LTE is going to be the future.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One problem with your idea is there are no devices on the market that support EV-DO on the SMR frequencies that Sprint has. Unless I'm wrong (which I wouldn't be surprised) then you would have to start selling devices to people that support 800 EV-DO, which would be counter-productive since LTE is going to be the future.

 

-Anthony

All Sprint devices that support 1x800 voice, also support EV-DO on 800. It's a built in design because of CDMA technology. However, Sprint is not planning to deploy EV-DO on 800, and I don't think they will reconsider anytime soon. LTE is the way everyone is going. EV-DO is heading the way of the dodo and CDMA 1x voice/data will eventually too.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Sprint devices that support 1x800 voice, also support EV-DO on 800. It's a built in design because of CDMA technology. However, Sprint is not planning to deploy EV-DO on 800, and I don't think they will reconsider anytime soon. LTE is the way everyone is going. EV-DO is heading the way of the dodo and CDMA 1x voice/data will eventually too.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

CDMA on sprint will be running till 2022 at least. I don't call that soon. And EVDO 800 on fast bsckhaul is more than enough capacity-wise for truly rural places once the roaming rates go up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDMA on sprint will be running till 2022 at least. I don't call that soon. And EVDO 800 on fast bsckhaul is more than enough capacity-wise for truly rural places once the roaming rates go up.

But sprint would rather go all in or none. No point in not making it LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE on 800 does indeed go a little farther than EVDO on 1900. But probably more important, LTE 800 penetrates within its coverage better than PCS on 1900. Also, LTE on 800 is important for any VoLTE strategy in the long run. It is smarter for Sprint to have faster and more capacity 5MHz LTE on 800, than to dedicate any SMR spectrum to EVDO. EVDO is a dead end technology.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • My hope is they can spot something in the data that was exported. I am going after all 4 carriers on a multitude of phones and Android versions. It should be noted I did not reboot after updates and some of the data was captured on the prior update. Data from some new Boost Mobile Dish (Echostar) sites in the Wheeling area did make it in. Was hoping for more SA data from the duo.
    • I was traveling for a couple of days.   Sunday evening, I upload from 3 phones.  A S-22 and two Moto 5G phones.  Everything looked ok.    How do we explain that?   One person has issues and another person does not.  All my phones have the latest update.
    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...